PL EN


2009 | 5 | 2 | 23-40
Article title

'Czesc chlopaku!' Rytualne aspekty okazywania zaangazowania w rozmowe w audycji radiowej.

Content
Title variants
EN
TALKING SHIT. THE RITUAL ASPECTS OF INVOLVEMENT DISPLAY IN CONVERSATION: AN EXAMPLE FROM RADIO.
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
In phone-ins on morning radio programs one can observe the presence of different ritual means which enable the host and the caller to build a rapport. These conversations are created for an overhearing audience, i.e. listeners at home who expect that the host will address the callers in a friendly and informal way. However, all radio talks are dependent on the institutional context of broadcasting and necessarily include specific features typical of formal talk. The author of the article claims that the 'friendly on-air chat' has, in spite of many demonstrations of intimacy between the hosts and the callers, a clearly professional character and shows how the hosts use the elements of high-involvement style to create the effect of bonding with the audience.
Year
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
23-40
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
  • Katarzyna Szkuta, University of Warsaw, ul. Krakowskie Przedmiescie 26/28, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland
References
  • Atkinson Max (1982) Understanding Formality: The Categorization and Production of ‘Formal’ Interaction, “The British Journal of Sociology”, Vol. 33, s. 86-117.
  • Brand Graham, Scannel Paddy (1991), Talk, identity and performance: The Tony Blackburn Show, [w:] Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, Sage, s. 201-226.
  • Brown Penelope, Levinson Stephen C. (1987), Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge University Press.
  • Clayman Steven E. (2006), Understanding News Media: The Relevance of Interaction, [w:], Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, red. Paul Drew et al., Sage, s.135-154.
  • Clayman Steven E. (1993), Booing: The Anatomy of Dissaffiliative Response, “American Sociological Review”, Vol. 58, No.1, s.110-130.
  • Clayman Steven E. (1991), News Interview Openings: Aspects of Sequential Organization, [w:] Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, Sage, s. 48-76.
  • Clayman Steven and Heritage John (2002), The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air, Cambridge University Press.
  • Drew Paul and John Heritage (1992), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, Cambridge.
  • Erickson Frederic (2007), Talk and Social Theory. Ecologies of Speaking and Listening, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • Goffman Erving (2006) Rytuał interakcyjny, Wyd. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  • Goffman Erving (1983), Interaction Order, “American Sociological Review”, 48 (l), s. 1-17.
  • Goffman Erving (1981), Forms of Talk, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
  • Goffman Erving (1977), The Arrangement between the Sexes, "Theory and Society", Vol.4, No.3, s.301-331.
  • Grice Herbert Paul (1977), Logika a konwersacja, „Przegląd Humanistyczny” nr 6, z. 7.
  • Heritage John (1985) Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience, [in:], Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Dijk Teun A. van, Vol.3, London.
  • Hutchby Ian (1991), The organization of talk on talk radio, [w:] Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, Sage, 119-137.
  • Hutchby Ian (2006), Media Talk. Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting, Open University Press.
  • Jefferson Gail (1974) Error Correction as an Interactional Resource, “Language in Society”, 2, s.181-199.
  • Maynard Douglas W., Clayman Steven E. (2003), Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, [w:] Larry T. Reynolds and Nancy J. Herman-Kinney (red.) The Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, s. 173-202.
  • Piotrowski Andrzej (1987), Ład perspektyw analitycznych w twórczości Ervinga Goffmana, "Kultura i Społeczeństwo" 3: 87-103.
  • Rancew-Sikora Dorota (2007), Analiza konwersacyjna jako metoda badania rozmów codziennych, Trio, Warszawa.
  • Scannell Paddy (1991), Introduction: the relevance of talk, [w:] Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, Sage, 1-13.
  • Schegloff Emanuel, Jefferson Gail, Sacks Harvey (1974), A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation, “Language”, 50, 4: 696-735.
  • Schegloff Emanuel, Jefferson Gail, Sacks Harvey (1977), The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation, "Language", Vol. 53, No.2, s.361-382.
  • Tannen Deborah (2005), Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends, Oxford University Press.
  • Tannen Deborah (1996), Gender and Discourse, Oxford University Press.
  • Whalen Marilyn and Zimmerman Don H. (1987), Sequential and Institutional Contexts in Calls for Help, “Social Psychology Quarterly”, 50, 172-85.
  • Winkin Yves (2007), Antropologia komunikacji. Od teorii do badań terenowych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
11PLAAAA10173
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.061c790a-39e0-39d6-8f94-19410ed6cdf3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.