PL EN


2009 | 16 | 3 | 283-303
Article title

TWO APPROACHES TO EVENT ONTOLOGY

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
In the paper, the author distinguishes between the semantic and the 'direct' approach to event ontology. The first approach, employed by D. Davidson, starts with logical analysis of natural language. This analysis uncovers quantification over the domain of events. Thus, we have ontological commitment to events and, at the same time, also a suggestion of how to view their nature. The second approach, used by J. Kim and D. Lewis, deals with events 'directly', i.e. not by analyzing language first. Events are postulated because they are useful in other theories (of causation, explanation, etc.) and their nature is adjusted to the needs of these theories. In the paper, the author analyzes both approaches and outlines their problems and advantages. He concludes that we should conditionally prefer the latter approach on the methodological grounds. This preference is based on the assumption that submitting hypotheses to the tests seems to be a crucial part of metaphysical methodology. Since the 'direct' approach to event ontology allows for more testing, it should be preferred over the semantic approach.
Contributors
  • Eugen Zelenak, Katedra filozofie, Filozoficka fakulta, Katolicka univerzita v Ruzomberku, Hrabovska cesta 1, 034 01 Ruzomberok, Slovak Republic; www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/organon
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
09SKAAAA07041
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.0c97e7da-41a2-38f2-b452-d422576f9ae0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.