PL EN


2004 | 48 | 1/2 | 115-123
Article title

Moses cornutus

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
HU
Abstracts
EN
The approach of Ex 34,29 suggested by St Jerome has long been refused by the common opinion of scholars. Translations accepted nowadays are based upon a reading of Hebrew supposedly different from the one used in the Vulgate and upon a disputable interpretation of Hab 3,4: both are insufficient to reject the wide-spread Latin version. Considering the passage within its wider context and the exegetical practice of its age reveals that the Vulgate's solution is reasonable, and the explanations related by Jewish and Christian commentaries of posterity illustrate a mutual vitality of diverse traditions in translation and hermeneutics.
Year
Volume
48
Issue
1/2
Pages
115-123
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
author
  • M. Foldvary, no address given, contact the journal editor
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
05HUAAAA00581480
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.15f90593-0810-3d91-ad7b-143e4b997beb
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.