PL EN


2004 | 13 | 4(52) | 191-211
Article title

Categorical Imperative: Personal, Legal and Political

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The author highlights different senses of the Categorical Imperative in ethics, law and politics. These three different interpretations produce moral conflicts among subjects who try to apply the imperative. For instance the legal imperative imposes on the political subject the obligation to observe all laws, and in consequence justifies participation in criminal acts that perpetrated without breaking any binding laws. This clashes with the demands of the ethical imperative. It is also argued that moral justification of all forms of political power by the political imperative generates dubious political imperative of submission to all authorities. It is so because political subjects do not possess the power, according to Kant, to propose politically and morally binding interpretations of the original contract.
Keywords
Contributors
author
  • T. Buksinski, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Instytut Filozofii, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89 C, 60-569 Poznan, Poland
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
05PLAAAA0030722
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.2f184839-f923-3c5b-b1b3-fc30a589f702
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.