Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2008 | 63 | 1 | 213-250

Article title

CHANGES IN THE USE OF SPATIAL FRAMES OF REFERENCE IN TYPICALLY DEVELOPING AND WILLIAMS SYNDROME CHILDREN

Title variants

Languages of publication

HU

Abstracts

EN
This study aimed to reveal the relationship between language and thinking, more specifically the linguistic relativism theory as formulated by Levinson (1996) and colleagues (Pederson, Danziger et al., 1998). The authors examined developmental change in the use of frames of reference in five typically developing groups (3-10 years) and a Williams syndrome group (7-21 years). Williams syndrome children were chosen to tease apart the different effects of language (relatively unimpaired) and cognition (mildly/severly impaired). Participants had to memorize a spatial array, then turn 180° and choose between two arrays, differing only in their frame of reference (relative or absolute). The authors also administered various tests (TROG, RAVEN, Corsi, RMET) to examine individual differences. The developmental trend was exactly the opposite of the hypothesis posed by Levinson: speakers of an inherently intrinsic/relative language seemed to prefer absolute choices increasingly with age. Yet a connection between language and reference frames could not be established by way of a correlation between administered language proficiency tests and preferred frame of reference. Williams syndrome children showed radically different preferences in the test, so we must conclude that their relatively impaired language could not give them a crutch in the task. The authors conclude that probably there is a threefold causality in the choice of reference frame in children: 1. Biological effects (such as sex and handedness) and 2. individual differences (such as intelligence and spatial memory) have a large impact on spatial reference choices (possibly only in childhood). 3. Both immediate (visible allocentric and egocentric cues) and general environment (education, culture) are important, yet language alone does seem to play a role.

Year

Volume

63

Issue

1

Pages

213-250

Physical description

Document type

ARTICLE

Contributors

author
  • Rozalia Eszter Ivady, no address given, contact he journal editor

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

CEJSH db identifier
10HUAAAA074012

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.3666d093-4b77-3b38-a326-65e3fa86ff5c
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.