PL EN


2008 | 4 | 1 | 1-12
Article title

RESISTING CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION: YOU CAN'T PUT A SALIENT MEANING DOWN

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Two experiments support the graded salience hypothesis (Giora 1997, 1999, 2003; Peleg et al. 2001, 2004), which assumes that early processing involves distinct mechanisms-linguistic and contextual-that do not interact but run parallel. While contextual processes make up an integrative, top-down mechanism that benefits from linguistic and extra-linguistic information, the linguistic mechanism is modular (Fodor 1983). Using Vu et al.'s (2000) materials, Experiment 1 shows that the sentential position of a target word (initial vs. final) is crucial for the operation of the global, predictive mechanism, whose effects, accumulated in prior discourse, mask lexical effects in final, but not in initial position. Experiment 2 shows that even in a sentential position that favors contextual effects (i.e. sentence final position, see Peleg et al. 2001, 2004), lexical access is not affected: Salient meanings are activated upon encounter of the lexical stimulus, regardless of contextual information to the contrary. Taken together, these findings argue against direct access models, which suggest that context can selectively activate the appropriate meaning, regardless of salience (see Vu and Paul 1998; Vu et al. 2000).
Contributors
author
author
author
  • Orna Peleg, University of Haifa (for postal address contact the journal editor)
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
10PLAAAA080419
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.38c847e7-6f0f-3cca-b90c-b01d2dd0dadd
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.