PL EN


2009 | 57 | 2 | 251-261
Article title

Co je pragmatismus?

Content
Title variants
EN
What is pragmatism?
Languages of publication
CS
Abstracts
EN
In response to the critique of Pavel Materna, I analyse the common conceptions of pragmatism which identify it, to different degrees, with utilitarianism. I argue that it is not difficult to defeat this kind of pragmatism (for example the debate between Bertrand Russell and William James) and to pronounce, along with Materna in his critique, that it is either mistaken or banal. I concentrate, in this article, on calling into question this pseudo-dilemma, as it is exhibited in the well-known ambiguity of Protagoras’ homo-mensura (man as the measure of all things, beings that they are, non-beings that they are not). On the first reading, which takes it to be the claim that whether it is day or night depends on my arbitrary choice, it is mistaken; on the second reading, which takes it to mean that I can easily call day “night”, and night “day”, it is banal, because this makes no change to things themselves
Keywords
EN
Year
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
251-261
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
  • Filosofický časopis, redakce, Filosofický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i., Jilská 1, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.4e46d647-4c2f-4147-bc79-9ec3a888ec52
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.