PL EN


2006 | 30 | 519-531
Article title

The Perfectum Forms and Their Functions in the Lithuanian Dialect of Punsk

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
In the Lithuanian dialect of Punsk (Polish locality at the Lithuanian border) and in the literary Lithuanian simple and compound verbal forms are distinguished. Simple dialectal forms (iterativum - the past iterative tense, praeteritum - the past non-iterative tense, praesens and futurum) reflect the situation known from the literary language. The differences, however, are found in the compound forms. In the literary variant those are forms of 'perfectum' and 'inchoativum'. The Lithuanian dialect of Punsk has no inchoativum forms.The paradigm of dialectal perfectum forms differs from its literary counterpart in two respects. Firstly, there is no copula in the dialectal forms of perfectum praesenti for the 1st and 2nd person, both singular and plural. In the literary language the role of copula is played by a finite form of the verb 'buti' (to be). Secondly, the Lithuanian dialect of Punsk allows the use of a finite form of the dialectal verb 'turec' (literary: tureti) (to have) as a copula. Two essential meanings of the dialectal perfectum are distinguished in the Lithuanian dialect of Punsk: a temporal and a modal one. Temporal meanings are further divided into resultative ones (e.g. dialectal 'Islavus padlagi'. - I have washed the floor. (+ result: the floor is now clean)) and experiential (asserting) ones (e.g., dialectal 'As buvis Vokietijoj. - I have been to Germany. (+ experience: I know how people live there, I know what cities and villages look like etc.). The modal functions, in turn, comprise the following meanings: imperceptive (the speaker reports information while expressing doubts as to its truthfulness), hypothetical (the speaker says that P is possible) and conclusive (based on physical results the speaker says that P is possible). Recently, an influence of literary norms on the dialectal form of perfectum has been observed. This includes the use of finite verb forms of the dialectal verb 'buc' (to be) and the literary 'buti' 'to be' in the function of a copula in the 1st and 2nd persons singular and plural, as well as replacement of dialectal participle forms with their literary equivalents.
Year
Volume
30
Pages
519-531
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
author
  • D. Roszko, Instytut Slawistyki PAN, ul. Bartoszewicza 1B m. 17, 00-337 Warszawa, Poland
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
07PLAAAA02144517
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.740c3913-65ab-3035-ae22-aa6765a07c86
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.