PL EN


2008 | 60 | 2 | 37-54
Article title

PANDECTISTIC LEGAL THOUGHT DURING THE TIME OF TRANSITION FROM CZARDOM TO SOVIET RUSSIA. Contemplations on incorporating the Russian perspective into the study of Roman Law

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
Research on the history of Roman Law in Russia does not only contribute to the knowledge of Russian private law history, but can also be of value for the understanding of Roman Law itself. The account of its historical influence on Russian law and its reception in Russia can induce a reflection on the perception held by those jurists whose perspective of Roman Law is different. An investigation into the nature of this perspective requires first and foremost an examination of the peculiar reception of Roman Law in Russia. This includes an analysis of the continuance of Pandectistic Legal Thought after the Socialist October Revolution of 1917. In July of 1922 a committee on the codification of the civil law was set up, directed by Vasilii Krasnokutskii. This jurist is hardly known today.Nevertheless, he can serve as an example of how the committee, when drafting the code, resorted to some texts based on Pandectistics and, thereby, to the Romanist tradition. A professor in Czarist Russia, Krasnokutskii was an expert on Baltic and Polish regional law (Partikularrecht), which were two private law systems within Czarist Russia eminently akin to Roman Law. Additionally, in the Soviet epoch he published several works on Roman Law. Consequently, Krasnokutskii can - with some reservations - be identified as a 'Romanist'. The main objections to the committee's draft were directed at its allegedly 'bourgeois' character and a perceived insufficiency of provisions allowing for state intervention in the code. In order to meet the concerns, the Bolshevik jurist Aleksandr Gojchbarg was entrusted with the revision of the Krasnokutskiij draft. As a consequence, the Civil Code which became effective in 1923 does show certain important elements characteristic of Socialist Legal Thought. But a closer inspection reveals that these cannot be qualified as the outcome of the consistent application of a carefully designed Socialist concept of civil law, but rather as evenly distributed fragments of Socialist Legal Thought blending in with the pre-existing body of law resulting in what later appeared to be an independent Socialist version of civil law. Despite these corrections the influence of the civil law tradition specific to Western Europe still remains clearly discernable in the code. It is based on civil law systems which had already been in existence, namely both pre-revolutionary civil law drafts and the German Civil Code. As Krasnokutskii's example shows, one of the main reasons for the impact of Roman Legal Thought on early post-revolutionary Russia can be found in the continued influence of certain jurists. Those jurists who were able to stay in the country after the demise of Czardom and participate in the building of the new legal order had studied their subject under the mediate influence of German Jurisprudence at the universities of Czarist Russia. They passed on a specific kind of legal reasoning which had been derived from the legal positivism of the second half of the 19th century and originated in Pandectistics itself.
Contributors
author
  • M. Avenarius, Universitaet in Koeln, Koeln, Bundesrepublik Deutschland
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
09PLAAAA057320
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.80fe032e-2a49-3900-abbc-97187b254e50
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.