PL EN


2005 | 14 | 4(56) | 317-331
Article title

The Hell of Having to Face the Truth

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
Two different interpretations of 'Huis clos' are proposed and both are presented as plausible. In the first reading the three protagonists are viewed as victims of the traditional, repressive society. Their difficulties are a result of social discrimination and stubborn adherence to stale morality of sham decency. In the second reading the three characters are viewed as selfish and inconsistent individuals who eagerly satisfy their desires and shamelessly neglect other people's needs. Now their difficulties are fully deserved as a punishment for cultivation of false ideas about their remarkable achievements, grand roles and fictitious obligations to others. Though both reading are plausible, the author argues that the second is more interesting and more characteristic of Sartre's philosophy. To sustain this claim the author offers a new, and rather unorthodox, interpretation of the concepts of 'etre-pour-autrui' and 'etre-pour-soi'. He concludes by presenting Sartre as a champion of an intellectualist ethics based on the concept of authentic life and a critical scrutiny of human motives.
Keywords
EN
ETHICS   HELL   SARTRE   TRUTH  
Contributors
author
  • J. Holowka, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Instytut Filozofii, ul Krakowskie Przedmiescie 3, 00-047 Warszawa, Poland
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
06PLAAAA01232814
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.8c097aaa-a1f7-3b30-83b6-e6e37bb18f31
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.