PL EN


2011 | 1 | 1 | 99-111
Article title

ADAPTIVE RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AT THE SERVICE OF INVENTIVENESS: A SCIENTIFIC WAY OF BEING CREATIVE AND EFFECTIVE IN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Student uniqueness demands that the teacher/catechist is inventive not only in the learning methods and teaching techniques employed but also in the way content is structured. Only in this way can the teacher ascertain that his/her students' requirements are met and, consequently, student learning facilitated. However, teachers' creativity should not mean haphazard choice of methods and techniques. Teaching is both an art and a science. The limitless nature of creativity should be used judiciously and made to bear fruit through the application of knowledge of educational psychology and instructional design. By using Adaptive Religious Education, the teacher may be guided to use different techniques in a methodical manner in order to ensure and enhance student learning. In particular, the systematic use of different symbol systems can help teachers to improve student learning. The paper will put forward a number of principles and practical suggestions that may guide teachers in planning R.E. lessons.
Contributors
author
  • Adrian Gellel, University of Malta http://www.um.edu.mt
References
  • Ackerman P. L., Aptitude complexes and trait complexes, “EducationalPsychologist” 38 (2003) Nr. 2, p. 85-93.
  • Baddeley A. D., Working Memory, Oxford, U.K. 1996, Publishing HouseClarendon.
  • Braido P., Lineamenti di storia della catechesi e dei catechism. Dal «tempo delleriforme» all’eta degli imperialismi (1450-1870), Leimann (Torino) 1991,Publishing House Elle Di Ci.
  • Cronbach L. J., The two Disciplines of Scientifi c Psychology, “AmericanPsychologist” 12 (1957) Nr. 11, p. 671-684.
  • Cronbach L. J. and Snow R.E., Aptitudes and Instructional Methods. A Handbookfor Research on Interactions, New York 1977, Publishing House Irvington.
  • Congregazione per il Clero, Direttorio Generale per la Catechesi, Città delVaticano 1997, Publishing House Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
  • Gellel A. M., Adapting Religious Education to Individual Requirements. A Meansof Being Faithful to the Pedagogy of God in the Classroom, Malta 2007,Publishing House Foundation for Theological Studies.
  • Gellel A. M., Adapting to the Requirements of the Individual in the R.E. Classroom,in: M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson, & A. McGrady (eds.),International Handbook of the Religious, Spiritual and Moral Dimensions ofEducation, Netherlands: Publishing House Springer, p. 1093-110.
  • Guilford J. P., Way Beyond the IQ: Guide to Improving Intelligence and Creativity,New York 1977, Publishing House McGraw-Hill.
  • Kapitzke C. & Graham P., Curriculum and Religion, in: P. Peterson, E. Baker, &B. McGaw (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education Amsterdam 2010,Publishing House Elsevier Science, p. 272-276.
  • Lee M. J., Facilitating Growth in Faith Through Religious Instruction, in: M.J.Lee (ed.), Handbook of Faith Birmingham, Alabama 1990, Publishing HouseREP, p. 264-302.
  • Paul VI, Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi 1975, http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/apost_exhortations/index.htm.
  • Sacra Congregazione del Clero Direttorio Catechistico Generale, Città delVaticano 1971, Publishing House Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
  • Second Vatican Council, Christus Dominus 1965, http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19651028_christus-dominus_en.html.
  • Sewall G.T., Religion in the Classroom: What the Textbook Tells Us, AmericanTextbook Council 1995, http://historytextbooks.org/religion.pdf.
  • Slavin R.J., The Philosophical Basis for Individual Difference According toSaint Thomas Aquinas, Washington D.C. 1936, Publishing House CatholicUniversity of America.
  • Snow R.E., Aptitudes and Symbol Systems in Adaptive Classroom Teaching, “PhiDelta Kappan” 78 (1997) Nr. 5, p. 354-360.
  • Snow R.E., Aptitude Theory: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow, “EducationalPsychologist” 27 (1992) Nr. 1, p. 3-52.
  • Snow R.E., The concept of Aptitude, in: R.E. Snow & D.E. Wiley (eds.), ImprovingInquiry in Social Sciences: A volume in honour of Lee J. Cronbach, Hillsdale,New Jersey 1991, Publishing House Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, p. 249-284.
  • Snow R.E., Corno L., & Jackson D., III. Individual Differences in Affective andConative Functions, in: D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (eds.), Handbook ofEducational Psychology, New York 1996, Publishing House MacMillan,p. 243-310.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
11PLAAAA10877
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.8f29c2c1-5f60-3bc8-9773-16dc54cdce95
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.