Changes in Metaphor Comprehension in Children

• Authors: Dryll Ewa
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The aim of the study was to follow the implicit patterns in children's responses to metaphor describing human by means of a name of animal. The main problem in present study was: which traits of topic (human) would be spontaneously used by children from three age groups? The study followed a quasi-experimental design. The subjects were 77 children from three age groups: 5;6-6;0, 8;0-8;6, 9;6-10;0. The dependent variable: the level of comprehension of 18 metaphors with vehicles from the animal domain and one topic - human. The variable was measured through individual Piagetian interviews. The study confirmed the hypothesis that the ability to activate metaphorical thinking in order to describe human attributes increases with age, with a turning point around 8 year of life. The traits mentioned by subjects could be classified into five categories: unambiguous evaluations, physical features, behavior, behavioral traits, dispositions (intellectual, emotional, communion) and agency. Older children assigned more human dispositional traits, thoughts and preferences to the objects of metaphors. Younger ones often focused on the physical features of animals. With age, the tendency to give positive evaluations to the objects of metaphors increases.

Keywords

EN

DESCRIPTION OF HUMAN; LINGUISTIC DEVELOPMEN; METAPHOR COMPREHENSION

Discipline

• PSYCHOLOGY: PSYCHOLOGY

• Publisher: Committee for Psychological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 40
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 49-57
• Document type: ARTICLE

Contributors

author

Dryll Ewa

• Ewa Dryll, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydzial Psychologii, ul. Stawki 5/7, 00-183 Warszawa, Poland

References

• Blasko, D. G. (1999). Only a tip of the iceberg: who understands what about metaphor?Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1675-1683.
• Brisard, F., Frisson, S., & Sandra, D. (2001). Processing unfamiliar metaphors in self-paced reading task.Metaphor and Symbol, 16 (1-2), 87-108.
• Ciechanowicz, A. (1981).Ewolucja skojarzeniowej struktury pola semantycznego wyrazów u dzieci w wieku od 2 do 15 lat. [The evolution of associative structure of semantic field in children from 2 to 15 year-old]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
• Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., & Smykowski, T. (2003). Reversibility, aptness, and the conventionality of metaphors and similes.Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (2), 85-105.
• Dryll, E. M. (2006). The development of abilities of metaphor comprehension. MA thesis, under supervision of Barbara Bokus, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
• Dryll, E. M. (2007). Badanie pól semantycznych jako metoda ustalania znaczeń metafor. [Exploring semantic fields as a method of establishing the meanings of metaphors]. Proceedings from V Conference on Narratives, 27-29 IX 2007 Polanica Zdroj, Poland.
• Gąsiorek, K. (1995). Metaforyka tekstów dziecięcych (na przykładzie klasy II). [Metaphors in children's narratives (on example of a second grade)]. In J. Ożdżyński (Ed.),Językowy obraz świata dzieci i młodzieży.[Lingustic sight of childrens' and youths' world] (pp.). Krakow: Wydawnictwo Naukowe WSP.
• Gentner, D. & Bowdle, B. (2001). Convention, form and language processing.Metaphor and Symbol, 16 (3-4), 223-247.
• Gineste, M., Indurkhya, B., & Scrat, V. (2000). Emergence of features in metaphor comprehension.Metaphor and Symbol, 15 (3), 117-135.
• Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 7 No.2, February 2003.
• Gluckberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories - quickly. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.),The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought(pp.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gluckberg, S., Newsome M. R., & Goldvarg, Y. (2001). Inhibition of the literal: Filtering of metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension.Metaphor and Symbol, 16 (3-4), 277-293.
• Haman, M. (2002).Pojęcia i ich rozwój: percepcja, doświadczenie i naiwne teorie[Concepts and conceptual development. Perception, experience, and naïve theories]. Warszawa: Matrix.
• Jones L. L. & Estes, Z. (2005). Metaphor comprehension as attributive categorization.Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 110-124.
• Keil, F. C. (1986). Conceptual domains and the acquisition of metaphor.Cognitive Development, 1, 73-96.
• Kennedy, J. M. & Chiappe, D. L. (1999). What makes a metaphor stronger than a simile?Metaphor and Symbol, 14 (1), 63-69.
• Kittay, E. & Lehrer, A. (1981). Semantic Fields and the Structure of Metaphor.Studies in Language, 5, 31-63.
• Kliś, M. (2004). Rozumienie tekstu opowiadania a wiedza społeczna czytelnika. [Understanding narratives and reader's social knowledge] In E. Dryll & A. Cierpka, (Eds.),Narracja. Koncepcje i badania psychologiczne. [Naratives. Conceptions and psychological research]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN.
• Kubicka, D. (1987). Kształtowanie się i funkcjonowanie znaczeń przenośnych u uczniów 10-14- letnich z różnych środowisk społecznokulturowych. [Formation and functioning of non-literal meanings in 10- 14-year-old pupils from different socio-cultural environments]. (Doctoral dissertation, under the supervision of M. Przetacznik-Gierowska, Jagiellonian University, 1987). Kraków.
• Kubicka, D. (2005). Myślenie metaforyczne i jego uwarunkowania u dzieci w wieku od 4 do 10 lat. [Metaphorical thinking and it's conditions in 4-10 year olds].Studia Psychologiczne, 43 (2), 59-73.
• Ricoeur, P. (1978). Metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling.Critical Inquiry, 5 (1), 143-159.
• Ricoeur, P. (1984). Proces metaforyczny jako poznanie, wyobrażanie i odczuwanie [The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, feeling].Pamiętnik Literacki, 75 (2), 267-280.
• Ritchie, D. (2003). Categories and similarities: a note on circularity.Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (1), 49-53.
• Rittel, T. (1995). Metafora i metaforyzacja w języku siedmio-, ośmio- i dziewięciolatków. [Metaphor and metaphorical processes in the language of seven- eight- and nine-years-olds']. In J. Ożdżyński (Ed.),Językowy obraz świata dzieci i młodzieży[Lingustic sight of children's and youths' world]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe WSP.
• Young, J. J. (2001). Risk(ing) metaphors.Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 607-625.

Identifiers

CEJSH db identifier

10PLAAAA075414

DOI

10.2478/s10059-009-0015-1