2009 | 2(67) | 9-29
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
Business organizations stand before the necessity of continuously striving to achieve a long–term competitive advantage. Global competition and dynamic changes in the business environment significantly increase the importance of innovation as leverage for success in growth efforts. Can strategic human resource management (SHRM) support an increase in innovation? How? The attempt at answering these questions is the objective of research undertaken by a team of Institute of Labor and Social Studies staff members under the authoress direction. Using research results as a basis, the intention of this article is to provide answers to the following questions: Is there a link between the level and dynamics of innovation and the alignment of company practice with HRM strategy as well as the company's overall strategy? Is the level of innovation in the organization dependent on the HRM model applied -HIWP concept or the HPWS)?
Physical description
Document type
  • Stanislawa Borkowska, Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych, ul. Bellottiego 3B, 01-022 Warszawa, Poland
  • Applebaum E., Bailey T., Berg P., Kalleberg A. (2000), Manufacturing Advantage, Cornell University Press.
  • Bacon N., Blyton P. (b.d.), Industrial Relations and the Diffusion of Teamworking: Survey Evidence from the UK Steel Industry, „International Journal of Operations and Production Management”, No. 20 (8).
  • Becker E.B., Huselid M.A. (1998), High Performance Work Systems and Firm Performance: A Synthesis of Research and Management Implications [w:] „Personnel and Human Resources Management”, Vol. 16.
  • Becker B.E., Huselid M.A., Pickus P.S., Spratt M.F. (1997), HR as a Source of Shareholder Value, „Human Resource Management Journal”, Vol. 31. No. 1.
  • Belcourt M., Bohlander G.W., Snell S.A., Sherman A.W. (2004), Managing Human Resources. Fourth Canadian Edition, Nelson.
  • Benson G.S., Lawler E. III, Young S. M. (2006), High-Involvement Work Practices and Analysts´ Forecasts of Corporate Earnings, „Human Resource Management”, Vol.45, No. 4.
  • Burns T., Stalker G.M. (1961), The Management of Innovation, London, Tavistock Publications.
  • Boxall P., Purcell J. (2000), Strategic Human Resources Management, „Journal of Management Review”, No. 2(2).
  • Borkowska S. (2006), Motywacja i motywowanie [w:] Król H., Ludwiczyński A. (red.), „Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi”, Wyd. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  • Borkowska S. (2007b), Dwie koncepcje proefektywnościowego ZZL [w:] Borkowska S. (red.), HPWS. Systemy wysoce efektywnej pracy, IPiSS, Warszawa.
  • Buren M., King S.B., 2000, The 2000 ASTD International Comparisons Report, Alexandria. Carrig K., Wright P. (2007), Building Profit through People, „Workforce Management on Line” January.
  • Conger J.A., Lawler E. (2002), Individual director evaluation. The next step in boardroom effectiveness, „Ivey Business Journal”, May/June.
  • Easton G.S., Jarrell S.L. (1998), The Effects of Total Quality Management on Corporate Performance: An Empirical Investigation, „Journal of Business”, No. 71.
  • European Commission (2008), European Innovation Scoreboard 2007. Comparative Analysis InnovationPerformance, Report 2008:51, [].
  • Gerhart B, Trevor C.O., Graham M. E. (1996), New Directions in Compensation Research: Synergies, Risk, and Survival, „Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management”, No. 14.
  • Gill C., Krieger H. (1999), Direct and Representative Participation in Europe, „The International Journal of Human Resource Management”, No. 10 (4).
  • World Economic Forum, WEF Website Global Competitiveness Report 2005-2006.
  • Gittell J.H., Seidner R., Wimbush J. (2007), Patient Care: A Several Capital Model of High Performance Work System, Sloan Industry Studies. Annual Conference. Cambridge. M.A.
  • Guest D.E. 1997, Human Resource Management and Performance: A Review and Research Agenda, „International Journal of Human Resource Management”, No.8 (3).
  • Guthrie J.P. (2001), High-Involvement Work Practices. Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence fromNew Zealand. „Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 44, No.1.
  • Huselid M.A., Becker E.B. (1995), The Strategic Impact of High Performance Work Systems, [].
  • Ichniowski C. (1995), Human Resources Management Systems and the Performance of U.S. ManufacturingBusiness, „NBER Working Paper Series”, Working Paper, No. 3449, Cambridge USA.
  • Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prenushi G. (1997), The Effects of Human Resource Management Practiceson Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines, „American Economic Review”, Vol. 87.
  • Ichniowski C., Kochan T., Levine D.I., Olson C., Strauss G. (2000), What Works at Work. Overview and Assessement [w:] Ichniowski C., Levine D.I., Olson C., Strauss G. „The American Workplace: Skills, Compensation and Employee Involvement”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • ILO, Supporting workplace learning for high performance working, [].
  • Katzenbach J.R. (2000), Peak Performance, Harvard Business School, Boston.
  • Katz R., James W.M. (2005), HRM and Innovation [w:] R.J, Burke, C.L. Cooper (eds.), „Reinventing Human Resource Management. Challenges and Directions”, Routledge Taylor&Francis Group, London – New York.
  • Kinnie N., Swart J., Rayton B., Hutchinson S., Purcell J. (2004), HR Policy and Performance: An Occupational Analysis, II HRM Study Group Working, „Papers in Human Resource Management“, No. 2.
  • Konrad A.M. (2006), Engaging employees through high-involvement work practices, „Ivey Business Journal”, March, April.
  • Lawler E. (1992), The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High Involvement Organization, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Lawler, E. (1998), High-Involvement Management, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Lawler E.E., Mohrman, S.A., Ledford, G.E. (1998), Strategies for Performance Organization, CEO Report, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Lawler E. III, Mohrman S., Benson G. (2001), Organizing for High Performance Employee Involvement, TQM, Reengineering, and Knowledge Management in the Fortune 1000, The Center for Effective Organization Report, San Francisco.
  • Legge, K. (2001), Silver Bullet or Spent Round? Assessing the Meaning of the High Commitment Management/Performance Relationship [w:] J. Storey (ed.), „Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, Thomson Learning”, London.
  • Lepak D.P., Snell S.A. (1999), The Human Resource Architecture. Towards a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development, „Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 24, No. 1.
  • Lindgren R, Stenmark D, Bergquist M, Ljungberg J., 2001, Rethinking Competence Systems for Innovative Organizations [w:] „Global Co-operation in the New Millennium”. The 9th European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia.
  • MacDuffie J. (1995), Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry, „Industrial & Labor Relations Review”, No. 48.
  • Nadler D.A., Gerstein M.S. (1992), Designing High Performance Work Systems: Organizing People, Work, Technology, and Information; Organizational Architecture, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Nadler D.A., Tushman M.L., Nadler M.B. (1997), Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Nonaka I. (1994), A Dynamic of Organizational Knowledge Creation, „Organization Science”, No. 5 (1).
  • Osterman P. (1994), How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopt It?, „Industrial and Labor Relations Review”, No. 47 (2).
  • Ouchi W.G. (1981), Theory Z, Addison-Wesley. Reading (Massachusetts).
  • Pascale R., Athos A. (1981), The Art of Japanese Management, Simon and Schuster, New York.
  • Sajkiewicz B, 2007, HPWS: doświadczenia zagraniczne [w:] S. Borkowska (red.), „HPWS. Systemy wysoce efektywnej pracy”, IPiSS, Warszawa.
  • Sienkiewicz Ł., Sajkiewicz B. (2007), Perspektywa HPWS w pomiarze efektywności zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi [w:] Borkowska S. (red.), HPWS. Systemy wysoce efektywnej pracy, IPiSS, Warszawa.
  • Snell S., Bohlander G. (2004), Managing Human Resources, Thomson South-Western, New York.
  • Vanderberg R., Richardson H., Eastman L. (1999), The Impact of High – Involvement Work Practices on Organizational Effectiveness: A Second-Order Latent Variable Approach, „Group & Organizational Management”, Vol. 24.
  • Wood, S. (1999), Human Resource Management and Performance, „International Journal of Management Review”, No. 1(4).
  • Wood S., Menezes L., Lasaosa A. (2001), High Involvement Management and Performance, University of Leicester, May.
  • Woźniakowski A. (2007), Koncepcja High Performance Work System. Źródła i rozwój [w:] Borkowska S. (red.), Systemy wysoce efektywnej pracy, IPiSS, Warszawa.
Document Type
Publication order reference
CEJSH db identifier
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.