TRACING PREHISTORIC OBSERVATORIES - SOME ISSUES CONCERNING ARCHAEOASTRONOMY (Muinasobservatooriumite jalgedel - monest arheoastronoomia probleemkohast)

• Authors: Jonuks Tonno
• Languages of publication: ET

Abstracts

EN

The article takes a critical look at archaeoastronomy as a marginalised area of research and dwells upon the so-called 'bad examples' with an aim to highlight the methodological reasons why archaeoastronomy is not considered a true science. The elicited examples are indeed made by amateurs, yet with an academic research background, and published in academic format. Thus, these treatments can potentially find their way into the knowledge of common people and shape their worldview. Until now, critical reviews of the relevant treatments have been non-existent, and the following article attempts to analyse the problematic issues in archaeoastronomy related treatments and bring out certain generalisations as to why such strange conclusions have been reached.

Keywords

EN

ARCHAEOASTRONOMY; ARCHAEOLOGY; ARCHAEOMYTHOLOGY; ASTRONOMY; CUP-MARKED STONES; SOURCE CRITICISM; STONE WALLS

• Publisher: Folk Belief and Media Group of the Estonian Literary Museum, Estonian Institute of Folklore, EKM Teaduskirjastus
• Journal: Mäetagused
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 48
• Pages: 65-78
• Document type: ARTICLE

Contributors

author

Jonuks Tonno

• Tonno Jonuks, Estonian Literary Museum, Vanemuise 42, 51003 Tartu, Estonia

Identifiers

CEJSH db identifier

11EAAAAA094620