Good practices for implementation of principles for responsible management education framework - research results

• Authors: Stachowicz-Stanusch, A.

Title variants

PL

Dobre praktyki wdrażania założeń principles for responsible management education (PRME) - wyniki badań

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In recent years ethical problems became the subject of special interest in academic and business environment as the risk connected with unethical behaviors of corporate leaders is visible in the light of crises caused by corruption scandals. For this reason many scholars draw increasing attention to the needs for the appropriate educating process of future managers. However, there are some initiatives dedicated to improve the process, such as Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) which seems to be a useful instrument for business schools to develop their educating activity towards fulfilling ethical objectives. In the paper author presents some organizational and educational practices applied by entities that adopted Principles for Responsible Management Education and published in Sharing Information on Progress reports. The analysis was based on over a hundred reports from 34 countries and was conducted in terms of over 50 criteria.

PL

Liczne skandale korupcyjne ostatnich lat zaowocowały wzmożonym zainteresowanie problemami etyki biznesu zarówno w środowisku akademickim, jak i w środowisku biznesowym. Coraz więcej uczonych zadaje sobie pytanie o rolę szkół biznesu w kształceniu przyszłych pokoleń liderów i zwraca coraz większą uwagę na potrzeby zapewnienia odpowiedniego (etycznego) procesu kształcenia przyszłych menedżerów. Istnieją już pewne inicjatywy poświęcone usprawnieniu procesu nauczania odpowiedzialnych, etycznych przyszłych liderów biznesy, jak Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME), które wydają się być użytecznym instrumentem dla szkół biznesu (zarządzania), umożliwiającym rozwijanie ich działalność edukacyjnej w kierunku wypełniania celów etycznych. W artykule autorka prezentuje organizacyjne i edukacyjne praktyki stosowane przez podmioty, które przyjęły zasady Principles for Responsible Management Education i opublikowane swoje osiągnięcia w tym zakresie w raportach informujących o postępach we wdrażaniu PRME. Analiza została oparta na ponad 100 raportach z 34 krajów i została przeprowadzona pod względem ponad 50 kryteriów.

Keywords

EN

responsible management education; ethical behavior; PRME

PL

zachowanie etyczne; odpowiedzialne nauczanie; PRME

• Journal: Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy
• Year: 2010
• Volume: nr 4
• Pages: 141-162
• Physical description: Bibliogr. 41 poz.

Contributors

author

Stachowicz-Stanusch, A.

• Politechnika Śląska Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Katedra Podstaw Zarządzania i Marketingu,

References

• 1. Amabile T.M., Barsade S.G., Mueller J.S., „Staw B.M.: Affect and creativity at work. „Administrative Science Quarterly”, no. 50, 2005.
• 2. Barbee B.: Ethics of entrepreneurship. „Baylor Business Review”, no. 22, 2005.
• 3. Barling J., Slater P., Kelloway E.K.: Transformational leadership and emotional intelligence: An exploratory study. „Leadership & Organization Development Journal”, no. 21(3), 2000.
• 4. Camevale P., Isen A.: The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiations. „Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes”, no. 37, 1986.
• 5. Chakraborty S.K., Chakraborty D.: Spirituality in management: Means or end? Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India 2008.
• 6. Chemiss C, Adler M.: Promoting emotional intelligence in organizations. ASTD, Alexandria 2000.
• 7. Christensen L.J. et al.: Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools. „Journal of Business Ethics”, no. 73, 2007.
• 8. Crane A., Matten D.: Questioning the Domain of Business Ethics Education. „Journal of Business Ethics”, no. 54, 2004.
• 9. Cronin B., Davenport E.: Social intelligence. „Annual Review of Information Science and Technology”, no. 28, 1993.
• 10. Dutton J.E., Glynn M.A.: Positive Organizational Scholarship, [in:] Barling J., Cooper C.L. (eds.): „Handbook of Organizational Behavior”, no. 1, 2008.
• 11. Gardner H.: Who Owns Intelligence?, 1999. www.kurzweilai.net.
• 12. Ghoshal S.: Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. „Academy of Management Learning & Education”, no. 4(1), 2005.
• 13. Goleman D.: Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books, New York 1995.
• 14. Harter L., Buzzanell P.: (Re)storying organizational communication theory and practice: Continuing the conversation about spirituality and work. „Communication Studies”, no. 58, 2007.
• 15. Keating D.P.: A Search for Social Intelligence. „Journal of Educational Psychology”, no. 70, 1978.
• 16. Lane I.F., Bogue E.G.: Faculty Perspectives Regarding the Importance and Place of Nontechnical Competencies in Veterinary Medical Education at Five North American Colleges of Veterinary Medicine. „Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association”, no. 237(1), 2010.
• 17. Lecker M.: Karnia Capitalism: A Normative Standard for Entrepreneurial Leadership, [in:] Stachowicz-Stanusch A. (ed.): Organizational Immunity to Corruption: Building Theoretical and Research Foundations. International Age Publishing, 2010.
• 18. Lennick D., Kiel F.: Moral Intelligence: Enhancing Business Performance and Leadership Success. Wharton School Publishing, 2005.
• 19. Matten D., Moon J.: Corporate Social Responsibility Education in Europe. „Journal of Business Ethics”, no. 54, 2004.
• 20. McGuire T.: From Emotions to Spirituality: „Spiritual Labor” as the Commodification, Codification, and Regulation of Organizational Members’ Spirituality. „Management Communication Quarterly”, no. 24( 1 ), 2010.
• 21. Miller R.A.: The Ethics Narrative and the Role of the Business School in Moral Development. „ Journal of Business Ethics”, no. 90, 2009.
• 22. Mitroff I.I.: An open letter to the deans and faculties of American business schools. „ Journal of Business Ethics”, no. 54, 2004.
• 23. Mitroff I.I.: Denton E.A.: A study of spirituality in the workplace. „MIT Sloan Management Review”, no. 40, 1999.
• 24. Moon J., Shen X.: CSR in China Research: Salience, Focus and Nature. „Journal of Business Ethics,” no. 94(4), 2010.
• 25. Neubaum D.O., Pagell M., Drexler J.A.Jr, McKee-Ryan F.M., Larson E.: Business education and its relationship to student personal moral philosophies and attitudes toward profits: an empirical response to critics. „Academy of Management Learning and Education”, no. 8(1), 2009.
• 26. Nicholson C.Y., DeMoss M.: Teaching Ethics and Social Responsibility: An Evaluation of Undergraduate Business Education at the Discipline Level. „ Journal of Education for Business”, no. 84(4), 2009.
• 27. Rhee S.Y.: Shared emotions and group effectiveness: The role of broadening-and-building interactions, [in:] Weaver K.M. (ed.): Proceedings of the Sixty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 2006.
• 28. Riggio R.E., Messamer J., Throckmorton B.: Social and Academic Intelligence: Conceptually Distinct but Overlapping Constructs. „Personality and Individual Differences”, no. 12, 1991.
• 29. Rodriguez A. (ed.): Essays on communication & spirituality: Contributions to a new discourse on communication. University Press of America, Lanham 2001.
• 30. Sharma R.R.: Preventing Corruption through Spiritual Leadership in Organisations, [in:] Stachowicz-Stanusch A. (ed.): Organizational Immunity to Corruption: Building Theoretical and Research Foundations, International Age Publishing, 2010.
• 31. Silvera D.H., Martinussen M., Dahl T.I.: The Tromso Social Intelligence Scale, a Self-Report Measure of Social Intelligence. „Scandinavian Journal of Psychology”, no. 42, 2001.
• 32. Stachowicz-Stanusch A.: Corruption immunity based on Positive Organizational Scholarship, Towards theoretical framework, [in:] Stachowicz-Stanusch A. (ed.): Organizational Immunity to Corruption: Building Theoretical and Research Foundations, International Age Publishing, 2010.
• 33. Stachowicz-Stanusch A.: The Principles for Responsible Management Education -a pathway to management education for integrity. „Organizacja i Kierowanie”, 2010 (in print).
• 34. Swanson & Fisher D.G. (eds.): Advancing Business Ethics Education. Charlotte, NC 2008.
• 35. Walsh J.P., Weber K., Margolis J.D.: Social Issues in Management: Our Lost Cause Found. „ Journal of Management”, no. 29(6), 2003.
• 36. Wigglesworth C: Why spiritual intelligence is essential to mature leadership. „Integral Leadership Review”, no. 6(3), 2006.
• 37. Williams O. (ed.): Business, religion, & spirituality: A new synthesis. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame 2003.
• 38. www.aspencbe.org.
• 39. www.ethicalcorp.com.
• 40. www.netimpact.org.
• 41. www.unprme.org.

Notes

Rekord pochodzi z bazy danych BazTech.