2011 | 1(58) | 167-184
Article title

Nomos i Ho Nomos w listach Pawłowych

Title variants
Nomos and Ho Nomos in Paul’s Letters
Languages of publication
At least since Origen there has been discussion how to understand in Paul's Epistles an articular and anarthrous form of nomos in relation to the Mosaic law. The consensus is that no firm rule can be established on the basis of the article's presence or absence. In this paper we indicated some trends in using and omitting the article. Context still remains a very important guide but our contribution consists in paying attention to the so-called Oral Tradition. In this way some unsolved cases can be explained.
  • JP II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland,
  • JP II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Raclawickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
  • J.-N. Aletti, Izraël et la Loi dans la Lettre aux Romains (LD 173; Paris 1998)
  • E. D. Burton, The Epistle to the Galatians (ICC; Edinburgh 1921)
  • J. D. G. Dunn, The Theology of Paul the Apostle (London-New York 2003)
  • G. D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI, 1987)
  • H. Hübner, Das Gesetz bei Paulus. Ein Beitrag zum Werden der paulinischen Theologie (Göttingen 1978)
  • J. H. Moulton, A Grammar of New Testament Greek (Edinburgh 1963)
  • J. Neusner, Early Rabbinic Judaism. Historical Studies in Religion, Literature and Art (Leiden 1975)
  • J. Neusner, Judaism: The Evidence of the Mishnah, Chicago 1981; tenże, The Mishnah before 70 (BJS 51; Atlanta 1987)
  • Y. Newman – G. Sivan, Judaism A – Z. Lexicon of Terms and Concepts (Jerusalem 1980)
  • H. Räisänen, Paul and the Law (WUNT 29; Tübingen 1983)
  • W. Rakocy, Faryzeusze. Historia – Ewangelie (Lublin 2002)
  • W. Rakocy, Paweł Apostoł. Chronologia życia i pism (Częstochowa 2008)
  • S. Safrai, Halakha, w: tenże (ed.), The Literature of the Sages, part 1 (Compendia Rerum Iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum; Philadelphia 1987)
  • W. Sanday – A. C. Headlam, The Epistle to the Romans (ICC, Edinburgh 1908)
  • A. F. Segal, „Torah and ‘nomos’ in Recent Scholarly Discussion” Studies in Religion 13 (1984)
  • T. E. van Spanje, Inconsistency in Paul? A Critique of the Work of Heikki Räisänen (WUNT 110; Tübingen 1999).
  • S. Zeitlin, “The Pharisees. A Historical Study”, JQR 52 (1961)
Document Type
Publication order reference
CEJSH db identifier
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.