BUILDING BRIDGES BETWEEN EVERYDAY ARGUMENT AND FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS OF REASONING

• Authors: Debowska Kamila , Lozinski Pawel , Reed Chris
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Argumentation theory, as a subdiscipline of philosophy, concentrates on the human expression of reasoning. It is an ancient area of research which has been enjoying a renaissance over the past thirty years or so with the development of two distinct theoretical branches: informal logic and pragma-dialectics. Both of these areas have influenced the development of mathematical and computational models of arguments that since the mid 90's has seen an explosion in research interest and output: with the area currently supporting two annual workshop series, a biennial conference series, a slew of journal special issues and, from 2010, its own dedicated journal. The links between the philosophical and formal ends of argumentation research, however, have been relatively sparse and ad hoc. This paper aims to build a bridge between the two areas that supports a more rigorous and extensive exchange of ideas and results to the benefit of both fields.

Keywords

EN

ARAUCARIA; ARGUING AGENTS COMPETITION; ARGUMENT DIAGRAMMING; ARGUMENT INTERCHANGE FORMAT; ARGUMENTATION STRATEGY; ARGUMENTATION THEORY; COMPLEX REAL-WORLD ARGUMENTATION; COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT; COMPUTER SCIENCE; INFORMAL LOGIC; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; PRAGMA-DIALECTICS

Discipline

• LIBRARY_&_INFORMATION_SCIENCE: LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
• Year: 2009
• Issue: 16(29)
• Pages: 95-135
• Document type: ARTICLE

Contributors

author

Debowska Kamila

author

Lozinski Pawel

author

Reed Chris

• Kamila Debowska, Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza, Al. Niepodleglosci 4, 61-874 Poznan, Poland

Identifiers

CEJSH db identifier

11PLAAAA10155