EN
In the article the author defines basic concepts used in contemporary metaethics under terms 'internalism' and 'externalism'. He points out that these terms denote very different theses depending on various contexts. It happens that one thesis labeled as (ethical) 'internalism' is substantively very close to other labeled as (ethical) 'externalism', and vice versa. Therefore we should define each claim precisely. He has done this specifying following 'internalisms/externalisms' in metaethics: 1) practical rationality i./e.; 2) content i./e.; 3) judgment i./e.; 4) appraisal i./e.; 5) mixed and undetermined i./e.; 6) acceptance i./e.; 7) knowledgeability i./e. The author proposes this classification as most comprehensive (to his knowledge) and useful in explicating the diversity of positions. It is also showing some important affinities between some of them.