2017 | 12 | 119-133
Article title

Assessing the Strategic Factors and Choosing the Development Scenarios for Local Administrative Units Using AHP

Title variants
Languages of publication
The main aim of this study is to assess the strategic factors (objectives, tasks and development scenarios) and to select the best scenario for local administrative units. Two approaches are used to solve this problem: classical and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on experts’ opinions. The research was based on data from surveys with the councillors of the urban and rural municipality of Międzychód and the rural municipality of Chrzypsko Wielkie. The importance of strategic factors for both municipalities was assessed, and the best development scenario was selected. As shown by the research, the most important scenario for the municipality of Chrzypsko Wielkie involves the development through support for entrepreneurship and agri-food processing, while that for the municipality of Międzychód involves the development by supporting housing, services and tourism.
Physical description
  • Poznań University of Life Sciences. Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences. Department of Finance and Accounting. Poznań, Poland
  • The Act on Commune Self-Government of 8 March 1990, Dziennik Ustaw (Journal of Laws) 2013, pos. 594, with subsequent (in Polish).
  • Aguaron J., Moreno-Jiménez J.M. (2003), The Geometric Consistency Index: Approximated Thresholds, European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 137-145.
  • Alonso J.A., Lamata M.T. (2006), Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A New Approach, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(4), 445-459.
  • Chang D.-Y. (1996), Application of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
  • Csutora R., Buckley J.J. (2001), Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis: The Lambda-Max Method, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 120(2), 181-195.
  • Franek J., Kresta A. (2014), Judgement Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP, Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 164-173.
  • Miller G.A. (1956), The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, The Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
  • Saaty T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Śmigielska K. (2013), Zastosowanie metody analitycznego procesu hierarchicznego do wyboru scenariuszy rozwoju gmin powiatu międzychodzkiego [Application of the Method of Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Selection of Development Scenarios for Municipalities in Międzychód County], Source material, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (in Polish).
  • Trzaskalik T. (2014a), Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Przegląd metod i zastosowań [Multicriteria Decision Support. Review of Methods and Applications], Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Seria: Organizacja i Zarządzanie Vol. 1921, 239-263 (in Polish).
  • Trzaskalik T., ed. (2014b), Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji [Multicriteria Decision Support], PWE, Warszawa (in Polish).
  • Wang J.-W., Cheng C.-H., Kun-Cheng H. (2009), Fuzzy Hierarchical TOPSIS for Supplier Selection, Applied Soft Computing, 9(1), 377-386.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.