Modele działalności pośredników wiedzy – uwarunkowania tworzenia i skuteczności

• Authors: Adam Janiszewski

Title variants

EN

Models of knowledge brokers’ activities

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

W artykule podjęto problematykę pośrednictwa w procesie transferu wiedzy. Nawiązując do modeli omawianych niegdyś w literaturze na temat zarządzania technologią, jak również obecnych aktualizacji na tym polu, autor rozważa możliwości i konsekwencje ich implementacji dla geograficznych skupisk przedsiębiorstw. Celem jest stworzenie podwalin pod budowę modeli działalności regionalnych instytucji pośredniczących w procesie transferu wiedzy.

EN

The paper discusses problems concerned with the participation of intermediary structures in knowledge transfer processes. Taking into account models presented earlier in literature in the field of technology management completed with latest propositions, the author considers both the possibilities and the consequences of the implementation of similar structures in geographical clusters of enterprises. The paper aims at laying foundations for the development of the models that can include the most important aspects connected with activities undertaken by regional institutions which play intermediary roles when knowledge is transferring.

Keywords

PL

Pośrednictwo; Transfer wiedzy; Zarządzanie technologią

EN

Intermediaries; Knowledge transfer; Technology management

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
• Journal: Studia Ekonomiczne
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 267
• Pages: 27-42

Contributors

author

Adam Janiszewski

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach. Wydział Zarządzania. Katedra Zarządzania Przedsiębiorstwem

References

• Bell S.J., Tracey P., Heide J.B. (2009), The Organization of Regional Clusters, „Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 34, No. 4.
• Bergenholtz C. (2011), Knowledge Brokering: Spanning Technological and Network
• Boundaries, „European Journal of Innovation Management”, Vol. 14, No. 1.
• Burt R.S. (2005), Brokerage & Closure, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Burt R.S. (1992), Structures Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard University Press, London.
• Camisón C. (2004), Shared, Competitive, and Comparative Advantages: A Competence- -based View of Industrial District Competitiveness, „Environment and Planning”, Vol. 36.
• Camisón C., Forés B. (2011), Knowledge Creation and Absorptive Capacity: The Effect of Intra-district Shared Competences, „Scandinavian Journal of Management”, Vol. 27.
• Camuffo A., Grandinetti R. (2011), Italian Industrial Districts as Cognitive Systems: Are They still Reproducible, „Entrepreneurship & Regional Development”, Vol. 23, No. 9-10.
• Dziubińska A. (2015), Tworzenie innowacyjnego modelu biznesu we współczesnym przedsiębiorstwie [w:] J. Pyka, J. Brzóska (red.), Nowoczesność przemysłu i usług, „Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Organizacja i Zarządzanie”, z. 83.
• Fleming L., Sorenson O. (2001), Technology as a Complex Adaptive System: Evidence from Patent Data, „Research Policy”, Vol. 30.
• Fleming L., Waguespack D.M. (2007), Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities, „Organization Science”, Vol. 18, No. 2.
• Giuliani E., Bell M. (2005), The Micro-determinants of Meso-level Learning and Innovation: Evidence from a Chilean Wine Cluster, „Research Policy”, Vol. 34.
• Jones C., Hesterly W.S., Borgatti S.P. (1997), A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms, „Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 22, No. 4.
• Lawson C., Lorenz E. (1999), Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity, „Regional Studies”, Vol. 33.4.
• Malmberg A., Maskell P. (2006), Localized Learning Revisited, „Growth and Change”, Vol. 37, No. 1.
• Maskell P. (2001), Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Geographical Cluster, „Industrial and Corporate Change”, Vol. 10, No. 4.
• Maskell P., Lorenzen M. (2004), The Cluster as Market Organization, „Urban Studies”, Vol. 41.
• McEvily B., Zaheer A. (1999), Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities, „Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 20.
• Morrison A. (2008), Brokers of Knowledge within Industrial Districts: Who They Are, How They Interact, „Regional Studies”, Vol. 42.6.
• Owen-Smith J., Powell W.W. (2004), Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits:
• The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community, „Organization Science”, Vol. 15, No. 1.
• Phelps C., Heidl R., Wadhwa A. (2012), Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks: A Review and Research Agenda, „Journal of Management”, Vol. 38, No. 4.
• Reagans R., McEvily B. (2003), Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range, „Administrative Science Quarterly”, Vol. 48.
• Tushman M.L., Scanlan T.J. (1981a), Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedences, „Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 24, No. 2.
• Tushman M.L., Scanlan T.J. (1981b), Characteristics and External Orientations of Boundary Spanning Individuals, „Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 24, No. 1.
• Whelan E., Teigland R., Donnellan B., Golden W. (2010), How Internet Technologies Impact Information Flows in R&D Reconsidering the Technological Broker, „R&D Management”, Vol. 40, No. 4.
• Zhao Z.J., Anand J. (2013), Beyond Boundary Spanners: The „Collective Broker” as an Efficient Interunit Structure for Transferring Collective Knowledge, „Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 34.

Identifiers

ISSN

2083-8611