PL EN


2017 | 27 | 58-74
Article title

The experiment in the management of human capital creativity

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The article includes the content of sample experiments whose results may be useful in the management of human capital creativity. It presents selected experiment concepts concerning ideational fluency, flexibility and originality and their subordination to basic patterns: simple real experimental patterns, simple basic pre-experimental patterns, simple basic quasi-experimental patterns. In addition, it includes the account of the experiment on attitude shaping. Methodical, ethical and economic limits of experiment application were determined, based on the analysis of reference books related to the method of the experiment and creativity management. The way to understand the constraints is included below in the glossary of key phrases. The subject of the study was chosen on the basis of the existent research gap. As results from analyses based on the study of foreign reference books conducted by J. Samul [2015], the experiment is still a rarely used research method in the area of human capital management. It can, therefore, be concluded that the same also (and perhaps even more so) applies to experiments concerning the management of employee creativity.
Year
Volume
27
Pages
58-74
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Department of Organizational Management. Faculty of Economics. University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • Department of Organizational Management. Faculty of Economics. University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • Department of Organizational Management. Faculty of Economics. University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
References
  • Aakar D.A., Day G.S. (1990): Marketing Research. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto.
  • Amabile T.M. (1982): Social Psychology of Creativity: A Consenusual Assessment Technique. “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 997-1013.
  • Amabile T.M. (1983): The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer Verlag, New York.
  • Amabile T.M. (1996): Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativiy. Westview Press, Boulder.
  • Basadur M.S. (1992): Managing Creativity: A Japanese Model. “Academy of Management Executive”, No. 6, pp. 29-42.
  • Cook T., Campbell D.T. (1979): Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Setting. Rand McNally College Publishing, Skokie, IL.
  • Creswell J.W. (1994): Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
  • Croson R. (2005): The Method of Experimental Economics. “International Negotiation” 2005, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 131-148.
  • Crozier W.R., Chapman A. (1981): Aesthetic Preferences: Prestige and Social Class. In: D. O’Hare (ed.). Psychology and the Arts. Humanities Press, New Jersey.
  • Davies M.B. (2007): Doing a Successful Research Project. Using Qualitative or Quantitative Methods. Palgrave, Macmillan, Basinstoke.
  • Davies H., Scase R. (2000): Managing Creativity. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
  • Duncker K. (1945): Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens. Springer, Berlin.
  • Farnsworth P.R., Beaumont H. (1929): Suggestion in Pictures. “Journal of General Psychology”, Vol. 2, pp. 362-366.
  • Frensch P.A., Sternberg R.J. (1989): Expertise and Intelligent Thinking: When Is It Worse to Know Better? In: R.J. Sternberg (ed.). Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence. Erlbaum, Hillside, Vol. 5, pp. 157-188.
  • Guilford J.P. (1978): Natura inteligencji człowieka. PWN, Warszawa.
  • Harrison G., List J. (2004): Field Experiments. “Journal of Economic Literature”, No. 42(4), pp. 1009-1055.
  • Hernandez E.M., Redien-Collot R. (2013): Méthodes de créativité et amélioration des projets entrepreneuriaux: présentation d’une expérimentation dans un contexte académique. “Revue Gestion 2000”, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 93-114.
  • Howkins J. (2001): The Creative Economy. How People Make Money from Ideas. The Penguin Press, London.
  • Isen A. (1990): On the Relationship between Affect and Creative Problem Solving. In: S. Russ (ed.). Affect, Creative Experience and Psychological Adjustment. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, pp. 3-17.
  • Jansson D.G., Smith S.M. (1991): Design Fixation. “Design Studies”, No. 12, pp. 3-11.
  • Karwowski M., Gralewski J. (2012): Threshold Hypothesis: Fact or Artifact? http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.003 (access: 12.11.2015).
  • Kubicka D. (2005): Strategie i techniki badania twórczości. In: A. Tokarz (ed.). W poszukiwaniu zastosowań psychologii twórczości. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków, pp. 125-153.
  • Köhler W. (1917): Intelligenzprüfungen an Menschenaffen. Springer, Berlin.
  • Łobocki M. (2011): Metody i techniki badań pedagogicznych. Impuls, Kraków.
  • Magyary-Beck I. (1999): Creatology. In: M.A. Runco, S.R. Pritzker (eds.). Encyclopedia of Creativity. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Nęcka E., Sowa J. (2005): Człowiek – umysł – maszyna. Rozmowy o twórczości i inteligencji. Znak, Kraków.
  • Nowak L. (1995): Pozaekonomiczne determinanty zachowań nabywców. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej, Poznań.
  • Olton R.M., Johnson D.M. (1976): Mechanism of Incubation: Searching for the Elusive. “Journal of Creative Behavior”, No. 13, pp. 9-22.
  • Parjanen S. (2012): Experiencing Creativity in the Organization: From Individual Creativity to Collective Creativity. “Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management”, No. 7, pp. 109-128.
  • Patrick (1937): Creative Thought in Artists. “The Journal of Psychology”, No. 4, pp. 35-73.
  • Ross S.M., Morrison G.R. (2007): Experimental Research Methods. In: D.H. Jonassen (ed.). Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. AECT, Bloomington.
  • Rószkiewicz M. (2002): Metody ilościowe w badaniach marketingowych. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  • Samul J. (2015): Przegląd metod badawczych zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi w literaturze zagranicznej, referat, sesja 1 „Badania w obszarze ZZL – rodzaje metod, ich etyka, skuteczność i wartość poznawcza”, VIII Zajazd Katedr ZZL „Zarządzanie Ludźmi w Sektorze Publicznym i Non Profit”, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Poznań, 21-22 września.
  • Smith S.M., Shah J.J. (2006): Empirical Studies of Creative Cognition in Idea Generation. In: L. Thompson, H.S. Choi (eds.). Creativity and Innovations in Organizational Teams. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, London – Mahwah – New Jersey, pp. 3-4.
  • Sokół A. (2015): Zarządzanie twórczością w organizacji. Koncepcja, metody i narzędzia. CeDeWu, Warszawa.
  • Wallas G. (1926): The Art of Thought. Harcourt, New York.
  • Ward T. (1995): What’s Old about New Ideas? In: S.M. Smith, T.B. Ward, R.A. Finke (eds.). The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 157-178.
  • Weisberg R.W. (2006): Creativity. Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
  • Wieczorkowska-Wierzbińska G., Wierzbiński J., Król G. (2015): Metody ilościowe. In: M. Kostera (ed.). Metody badawcze w zarządzaniu humanistycznym. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Sedno, Warszawa.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
1732-1948
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-20a65e68-c108-43e1-9e6e-23367a346cb9
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.