BERTRAND RUSSELL’S CRITICISM OF BERGSON’S VIEWS ABOUT CONTINUITY AND DISCRETENESS

• Authors: Vesselin Petrov
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper is devoted to Bertrand Russell’s criticism of Henri Bergson’s philosophy. It traces out the origins of that criticism and analyses its essence, reasons and development in Russell’s works. Because of the importance of the concepts of space and time for Bergson’s philosophy and, in turn, the importance of continuity and discreteness for the understanding of space and time, the central part of the analysis concerns the views of the both philosophers on continuity and discreteness, including Zeno’s paradoxes. The main thesis of the paper is that Russell’s criticism of Bergson’s philosophy comes, to a great extent, from Russell’s misunderstanding of Bergson.

Keywords

EN

BERTRAND RUSSELL; PHILOSOPHY; BERGSON; CONTINUITY; DISCRETENESS; ZENO’S PARADOXES

• Publisher: Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Filozofia (Philosophy)
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 68
• Issue: 10
• Pages: 890 – 904

Contributors

author

Vesselin Petrov

• Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 13a, Moskovska Street, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria