Odhad ekonomických efektů veřejné infrastruktury v území metodami hedonických cen

• Authors: Vorel Jakub , Franke Daniel , Benešová Irena , Gabaš Ondřej , Kačarevič Sead-Aldin , Makovský Lukáš

Title variants

EN

Estimation of the economic effects of public infrastructure by methods of hedonic pricing

• Languages of publication: CS

Abstracts

EN

This article describes the results of a research project the aim of which was to propose and apply methods of pricing of public possessions for the purpose of spatial planning. The research has focused on hedonic pricing methods, using these to estimate the economic effects of the proximity of metro stops, railway stations, public zones, parks, natural areas and school facilities. The opening part comments on various approaches to the evaluation of public estate and the methods usually used for evaluation. A description of the theory, ways of estimation and domains of use of hedonic pricing is followed by the results of an extensive survey of studies in hedonic pricing in the Czech Republic and abroad. The main part of the article deals with the application of hedonic pricing and the evaluation of its economic effects on public possessions in the city of Prague and the Region of Central Bohemia. The results show significant local economic impacts of these methods. The results indicate significant local economic effects of public possessions, for example a metro station within 600m of a property increases its value by 4.2%, the presence of a park within 300m increases the property price by 1%, and an increase in the proportion of natural areas within 800m of the property increases its value by 1.2%. The analysis also indicates that a primary school that reports gifted pupils on its register increases the value of properties in that school’s district by 1%. Besides benefits, the final part of the article enumerates limitations arising mainly from a lack of data available, complex interconnection of effects and significant heterogeneity in the qualities of territories.

Článek prezentuje výsledky výzkumného projektu, jehož cílem je navrhnout a aplikovat metody oceňování veřejných statků pro účely prostorového plánování. Výzkum se zaměřuje na metody hedonických cen, které využívá k odhadování ekonomických efektů blízkosti stanic metra, železničních stanic, veřejných prostranství, parků, přírodních ploch a školských zařízení. V úvodu jsou představeny různé pohledy na hodnocení veřejných statků a obvykle používané hodnotící metody. Následuje představení teorie, způsobu odhadování a oblastí využití hedonických cen. Článek dále prezentuje výsledky obsáhlé rešerše studií hedonických cen realizovaných v ČR a zejména v zahraničí. Jádrem článku je představení výsledků aplikace metody hedonických cen na hodnocení ekonomických efektů veřejných statků na území hl. m. Prahy a Středočeského kraje. Výsledky ukazují významné lokální ekonomické efekty veřejných statků. Tyto výsledky naznačují výrazný lokální ekonomický efekt veřejných statků, například stanice metra ve vzdálenosti do 600 m zvyšuje cenu nemovitosti o 4,2 %, park ve vzdálenosti do 300 m zvyšuje cenu nemovitosti o 1 % a vyšší podíl přírodních prostor ve vzdálenosti do 800 m od nemovitosti zvyšuje její cenu o 1,2 %. Z analýzy plyne, že i základní škola, kterou navštěvují nadané děti, zvyšuje hodnotu nemovitostí ve svém okolí o 1 %. V závěru jsou uvedeny jak přínosy metod hedonických cen, tak i jejich limity, které vyplývají zejména z omezené datové základny, komplexní provázanosti efektů v území a významné heterogenity vlastností území.

Keywords

CS

veřejné statky; veřejná infrastruktura; valuační metody; hedonické ceny; trh s nemovitostmi; územní rozvoj; statistická regrese

EN

public possessions; public infrastructure; valuation methods; hedonic prices; real estate market; spatial development; statistical regression

• Publisher: Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR. Ústav územního rozvoje
• Journal: Urbanismus a územní rozvoj
• Year: 2022
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 8-22

Contributors

author

Vorel Jakub

• Faculty of Architecture, Czech Technical University in Prague

author

Franke Daniel

• Faculty of Architecture, Czech Technical University in Prague

author

Benešová Irena

• Faculty of Architecture, Czech Technical University in Prague

author

Gabaš Ondřej

• Prague Institute of Planning and Development

author

Kačarevič Sead-Aldin

• Prague Institute of Planning and Development

author

Makovský Lukáš

• Dataligence, s. r. o.

References

• BANERJEE, Abhijit, Iyer LAKSHMI a Rohini SOMANATHAN, 2007. Public Action for Public Goods. In: T. Paul SCHULTZ a John A. STRAUSS, ed. Handbook of Development Economics [on-line]. 4. vyd. Amsterdam: North-Holland, s. 3117–3154. Dostupné z: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(07)04049-1.
• HYPOTEČNÍ BANKA, 2022. HB Index: Nemovitosti v prvním čtvrletí zdražují stejným tempem jako v loňském roce - Hypoteční banka [on-line]. 2022. Dostupné z: https://www.hypotecnibanka.cz/o-bance/pro-media/hb-index/hb-index-nemovitosti-v-prvnim-ctvrleti-z1/.
• BOCKARJOVA, M, W J W BOTZEN, M H VAN SCHIE a M J KOETSE, 2020. Property price effects of green interventions in cities: A meta-analysis and implications for gentrification. Environmental Science and Policy [on-line]. 112. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.024.
• BOHMAN, Helena a Désirée NILSSON, 2016. The impact of regional commuter trains on property values: Price segments and income. Journal of Transport Geography [on-line]. 56, 102–109. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.09.003.
• BOYNE, George A., 1998. Public Choice Theory and Local Government: A comparatiive analysis of the UK and the USA [on-line]. 1. vyd. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Dostupné z: doi:10.1057/9780230373099.
• BRANDER, Luke M a Mark J KOETSE, 2011. The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management [online]. 92(10), 2763–2773. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019.
• BRASINGTON, David M a Diane HITE, 2005. Demand for environmental quality: A spatial hedonic analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics [on-line]. 35(1), 57–82. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2003.09.001.
• CARSON, Richard T., Nicholas E. FLORES a Norman F. MEADE, 2001. Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics [on-line]. 19(2), 173–210. ISSN 09246460. Dostupné z: doi:10.1023/A:1011128332243.
• CORDERA, Ruben, Vincenza CHIARAZZO, Michele OTTOMANELLI, Luigi DELL’OLIO a Angel IBEAS, 2019. The impact of undesirable externalities on residential property values: spatial regressive models and an empirical study. Transport Policy [on-line]. 80(March 2018), 177–187. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.04.010.
• CZEMBROWSKI, Piotr, Jakub KRONENBERG a Michał CZEPKIEWICZ, 2016. Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods – SoftGIS and hedonic pricing. Ecological Economics [on-line]. 130, 166–175 [vid. 2022-01-19]. ISSN 0921-8009. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2016.07.004.
• CZEMBROWSKI, Piotr, Edyta ŁASZKIEWICZ, Jakub KRONENBERG, Gustav ENGSTRÖM a Erik ANDERSSON, 2019. Valuing individual characteristics and the multifunctionality of urban green spaces: The integration of sociotope mapping and hedonic pricing. PLOS ONE [on-line]. 14(3), e0212277–e0212277. ISSN 1111111111. Dostupné z: doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0212277.
• DAAMS, Michiel N, Frans J SIJTSMA a Arno J VAN DER VLIST, 2016. The effect of natural space on nearby property prices: Accounting for perceived attractiveness. Land Economics [on-line]. 92(3), 389–410. Dostupné z: doi:10.3368/LE.92.3.389.
• DAAMS, Michiel N, Frans J SIJTSMA a Paolo VENERI, 2019. Mixed monetary and non-monetary valuation of attractive urban green space: A case study using Amsterdam house prices. Ecological Economics [on-line]. 166(November 2018). Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106430.
• DE HAAN, Jan a Erwin DIEWERT, 2013. Hedonic Regression Methods. In: et al. OECD, ed. Handbook on Residential Property Prices Indices (RPPIs). 2013 edition. Luxembourg: Eurostat: Publications Office of the European Union, s. 49.
• DE VRIES, Sjerp, Arjen E BUIJS, Fransje LANGERS, Hans FARJON, Arjen VAN HINSBERG a Frans J SIJTSMA, 2013. Measuring the attractiveness of Dutch landscapes: Identifying national hotspots of highly valued places using Google Maps. Applied Geography [on-line]. 45, 220–229. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/J.APGEOG.2013.09.017.
• DEBREZION, Ghebreegziabiher, Eric PELS a Piet RIETVELD, 2007. The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value: A meta-analysis. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics [on-line]. 35(2). Dostupné z: doi:10.1007/s11146-007-9032-z.
• DIAMOND JR, Douglas B., 1980. The Relationship between Amenities and Urban Land Prices. Land Economics. 56(1), 21–32.
• DUBÉ, Jean, Marius THÉRIAULT a François DES ROSIERS, 2013. Commuter rail accessibility and house values: The case of the Montreal South Shore, Canada, 1992-2009. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [on-line]. 54, 49–66. ISSN 09658564. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.07.015.
• EFTHYMIOU, D a C ANTONIOU, 2013. How do transport infrastructure and policies affect house prices and rents? Evidence from Athens, Greece. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [on-line]. 52, 1–22. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.04.002.
• FACK, Gabrielle a Julien GRENET, 2010. When do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris public and private schools. Journal of Public Economics [on-line]. 94(1–2), 59–77 [vid. 2022-01-04]. ISSN 0047-2727. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2009.10.009.
• FAHRLÄNDER, Stefan, Magnus DANNECK a Andrew KNIGHT, 2021. What is ‘Hedonic Valuation’ and how does it factor into Automatic Valuation Models? [on-line]. 2021. [vid. 2022-08-22]. Dostupné z: https://www.rics.org/ssa/surveying-profession/global-professional-network/rics-tech-partner-programme/tech-partner-programme-blog/what-is-hedonic-valuation-and-how-does-it-factor-into-automatic-valuation-models/.
• FERNANDEZ, Mario Andres a Santiago BUCARAM, 2019. The changing face of environmental amenities: Heterogeneity across housing submarkets and time. Land Use Policy [on-line]. 83(April 2018), 449–460. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.024.
• FIVA, Jon H. a Lars J. KIRKEBØEN, 2008. Does the Housing Market React to New Information on School Quality? SSRN Electronic Journal [on-line]. [vid. 2022-01-04]. ISSN 1892-753x. Dostupné z: doi:10.2139/SSRN.1130155.
• GIBBONS, Stephen a Stephen MACHIN, 2008. Valuing school quality, better transport, and lower crime: Evidence from house prices. Oxford Review of Economic Policy [on-line]. 24(1), 99–119. Dostupné z: doi:10.1093/OXREP/GRN008.
• GRAVES, Philip E., 2020. Externalities, public goods, and property rights revisited: regulations based on traditional B–C analyses are too lax. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy [on-line]. 9(2), 220–226. ISSN 21606552. Dostupné z: doi:10.1080/21606544.2019.1660232.
• GROVES, Theodore a John LEDYARD, 1977. Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the „Free Rider" Problem. Econometrica [on-line]. 45(4), 783. ISSN 00129682. Dostupné z: doi:10.2307/1912672
• GUILLOUZOUIC, Arthur, Emeric HENRY a Joan MONRAS, 2021. SCIENCES PO ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER: Local Public Goods and the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activity. 2021–05.
• HANCK, Christoph, 2011. Joshua D. Angrist and Jorn-Steffen Pischke (2009): Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Statistical papers (Berlin, Germany). 52(2), 503.
• HECKERT, Megan, 2015. A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Approach To Studying the Effect of Greening Vacant Land on Property Values.
• HESS, Daniel Baldwin a Tangerine Maria ALMEIDA, 2007. Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York. Urban Studies [on-line]. 44(5–6), 1041–1068. Dostupné z: doi:10.1080/00420980701256005.
• KERKHOF, Annemarie, Eric DRISSEN, Anton S. UITERKAMP a Henk MOLL, 2010. Valuation of environmental public goods and services at different spatial scales: A review. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences [on-line]. 7(2), 125–133. ISSN 1943815X. Dostupné z: doi:10.1080/19438151003709832.
• KIM, H Youn, Keith R MCLAREN a K K.Gary WONG, 2020. Valuation of public goods: an intertemporal mixed demand approach [on-line]. B.m.: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 0123456789. Dostupné z: doi:10.1007/s00181-019-01734-0.
• KRIGSMAN, Michael, 2017. Zillow: Machine learning and data disrupt real estate | ZDNET [on-line] [vid. 2022-08-22]. Dostupné z: https://www.zdnet.com/article/zillow-machine-learning-and-data-in-real-estate/.
• KUMINOFF, Nicolai V. a Jaren C. POPE, 2014. Do „capitalization effects" for public goods reveal the public’s willingness to pay? International Economic Review [on-line]. 55(4), 1227–1250. ISSN 14682354. Dostupné z: doi:10.1111/iere.12088.
• LANCASTER, K, 1966. A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy. 74(2), 132–157.
• LANG, Corey, 2015. The dynamics of house price responsiveness and locational sorting: Evidence from air quality changes. Regional Science and Urban Economics [on-line]. 52, 71–82. ISSN 18792308. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.02.005.
• ŁASZKIEWICZ, Edyta, Piotr CZEMBROWSKI a Jakub KRONENBERG, 2019. Can proximity to urban green spaces be considered a luxury? Classifying a non-tradable good with the use of hedonic pricing method. Ecological Economics [on-line]. 161, 237–247. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2019.03.025.
• LIAO, Wen Chi a Xizhu WANG, 2012. Hedonic house prices and spatial quantile regression. Journal of Housing Economics [on-line]. 21(1), 16–27. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2011.11.001.
• MCMILLEN, Daniel P a Christian L REDFEARN, 2010. Estimation and Hypothesis Testing for Nonparametric Hedonic House Price Functions. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE [on-line]. 50(3), 712–733. Dostupné z: doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00664.x.
• MEDDA, Francesca Romana a Marta MODELEWSKA, 2011. Land value capture as a funding source for urban investment: the Warsaw metro system.
• MELICHAR, Jan a Kateřina KAPROVÁ, 2013. Revealing preferences of Prague’s homebuyers toward greenery amenities: The empirical evidence of distance-size effect. Landscape and Urban Planning [on-line]. 109(1), 56–66. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.003.
• MELICHAR, Jan a Milan ŠČASNÝ, 2006. Introduction to Non-Market Valuation Methods and Critical Review of Their Application in the Czech Republic. In: Jan MELICHAR a Milan ŠČASNÝ, ed. Development of the Czech society in the European Union. Part V: Nonmarket valuation methods in environmental area. Prague: Matfyzpress, s. 43–94.
• MELICHAR, Jan, Ondřej VOJÁČEK, Pavel RIEGER a Karel JEDLIČKA, 2009. Application of Hedonic Price Model in the Prague Property Market Theoretical rinciples of hedonic price method [on-line]. Dostupné z: http://www.reality.cz.
• MOHAMMAD, Sara I, Daniel J GRAHAM, Patricia C MELO a Richard J ANDERSON, 2013. A meta-analysis of the impact of rail projects on land and property values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [on-line]. 50, 158–170. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.013.
• NGUYEN-HOANG, Phuong a John YINGER, 2011. The capitalization of school quality into house values: A review. Journal of Housing Economics [on-line]. 20(1), 30–48. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/J.JHE.2011.02.001.
• NOH, Youngre, 2019. Does converting abandoned railways to greenways impact neighboring housing prices? Landscape and Urban Planning [on-line]. 183(November 2018), 157–166. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.11.002.
• NOONAN, Douglas S., 2003. Contingent valuation and cultural resources: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Journal of Cultural Economics [on-line]. 27(3–4), 159–176. ISSN 08852545. Dostupné z: doi:10.1023/A:1026371110799.
• OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR TRANSPORTATION POLICY AT USDT, 2016. TIGER 2016: Preparing a BenefitCost Analysis. 2016.
• PANDURO, Toke Emil, Cathrine Ulla JENSEN, Thomas Lundhede LUNDHEDE a Bo Jellesmark THORSEN, 2016. Estimating demand schedules in hedonic analysis: The case of urban parks. IFRO workingpapers [on-line]. 6. Dostupné z: http://okonomi.foi.dk/workingpapers/WPpdf/WP2016/IFRO_WP_2016_06.pdf.
• PROAG, Virendra, 2021. Infrastructure as Public or Private Goods. In: Infrastructure Planning and Management: An Integrated Approach [on-line]. Cham: Springer, , s. 469–497. Dostupné z: doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48559-7_17.
• R, [b.r.]. R: What is R? [on-line] [vid. 2022-08-30]. Dostupné z: https://www.r-project.org/about.html
• RODRÍGUEZ, Daniel A a Felipe TARGA, 2007. Value of accessibility to Bogotá’s bus rapid transit system. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164042000195081 [on-line]. 24(5), 587–610. Dostupné z: doi:10.1080/0144164042000195081.
• ROSEN, Sherwin, 1974. Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy. 82(1), 34–55.
• SAMUELSON, Paul A., 1954. The Pure theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 36(3), 3–30. ISSN 0895-3309.
• SAZ-SALAZAR, Salvador del, Leandro GARCÍA-MENÉNDEZ a María FEO-VALERO, 2012. Meeting the environmental challenge of port growth: A critical appraisal of the contingent valuation method and an application to Valencia Port, Spain. Ocean and Coastal Management [on-line]. 59, 31–39. ISSN 09645691. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.12.017.
• SILVER, Mick, 2020. Report to the Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO) on two hedonic models: the residential property (house) price index (RPPI) and the rent price index (RPI) [on-line]. Dostupné z: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/prices/surveys/impi.assetdetail.14966772.html.
• THAMPAPILLAI, Dodo J. a Matthias RUTH, 2019. Environmental Economics: Concepts, Methods and Policies - 1st Edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
• TIEBOUT, Charles M, 2015. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839 [online]. 64(5), 416–424. Dostupné z: doi:10.1086/257839.
• TRANSPORT FOR LONDON, 2017. Land value capture: Final report [on-line]. 2017. Dostupné z: https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/land_value_capture_report_transport_for_london.pdf.
• TROY, Austin a J Morgan GROVE, 2008. Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landscape and Urban Planning [on-line]. 87(3), 233–245. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.005.
• ÚŘAD, Český statistický, 2020. Ceny sledovaných druhů nemovitostí - 2017–2019 | ČSÚ [on-line]. 2020. Dostupné z: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/123243628/01400620u.pdf/b73ede18-5a17-4c11-961c-c54dcfe79204?version=1.3.
• USDT, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy at, 2016. TIGER 2016: Preparing a BenefitCost Analysis [on-line]. 2016. Dostupné z: https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/TIGER_BCA_Webinar%202016.pdf.
• WALKER, Mark, 1981. A Simple Incentive Compatible Scheme for Attaining Lindahl Allocations.
• WEI, Cankun, Meichen FU, Li WANG, Hanbing YANG, Feng TANG a Yuqing XIONG, 2022. The Research Development of Hedonic Price Model-Based Real Estate Appraisal in the Era of Big Data. Land [on-line]. 11(3), 334. ISSN 2073-445X. Dostupné z: doi:10.3390/land11030334.
• WU, Chao, Xinyue YE, Qingyun DU a Ping LUO, 2017. Spatial effects of accessibility to parks on housing prices in Shenzhen, China. Habitat International [on-line]. 63, 45–54. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.010.
• YANG, Dennis Tao, 2004. Education and allocative efficiency: Household income growth during rural reforms in China. Journal of Development Economics [on-line]. 74(1), 137–162. ISSN 1540231747. Dostupné z: doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.12.007.