2017 | 28 | 5-22
Article title

A key factor of the DCF model coherency

Title variants
Languages of publication
Aim/purpose – The aim of this paper is to provide economically justified evidence that the business value calculated by income valuation methods is the same, regardless of the type of cash flow used in the valuation algorithm. Design/methodology/approach – The evidence was arrived at using free cash flow to equity (FCFE), debt (FCFD) and firm (FCFF). The article draws attention to the FCFF method’s particular popularity in income valuation, based on analysts’ practice. It shows an overview of various approaches to determine the capital structure in the formula for WACC, both in practice and theory. Finally, it examines an empirical example with the authors’ own derivations and postulates. Findings – The conclusion drawn from the conducted analysis is that the key to the reconciliation process, and thus DCF model coherency, is to apply the appropriate method of capital structure estimation during the calculation of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). This capital structure will henceforth be referred to as ‘income weights’. Research implications/limitations – It should be noted that the obtained compliance of valuation results does not imply that the income valuation becomes an objective way of determining business value. It still remains subjective. Originality/value/contribution – According to the presented approach, the DCF model’s subjectivism is limited to the forecasts. The rest is the algorithm which, based on the principles of mathematics, should be used in the same way in every situation.
Physical description
  • Faculty of Finance and Insurance. University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • Faculty of Finance and Insurance. University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • Arnold G.C., Hatzopoulos P.D. (2000): The theory-practice gap in capital budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom. “Journal of Business Finance & Accounting”, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 603-626, DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00327.
  • Bancel F., Mittoo U.R. (2014): The gap between theory and practice of firm valuation: Survey of European valuation experts. “Journal of Applied Corporate Finance”, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 106-117, DOI: 10.1111/jacf.12095.
  • Bartoszewicz B., Pniewski K., Szablewski A., ed. (2008): Value based management; koncepcje, narzędzia, przykłady. Poltext, Warszawa.
  • Benninga S.Z., Sarig O.H. (1997): Corporate finance: A valuation approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Cegłowski B., Podgórski B. (2012): Equity shares equating the results of FCFF and FCFE methods. “e-Finanse”, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 34-43.
  • Copeland T., Koller T., Murrin J. (1990): Valuation; measuring and managing the value of companies. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Cornell B. (1993): Corporate valuation; tools for effective appraisal and decision making. Business One Irwin, Illinois.
  • Damodaran A. (1994): Damodaran on valuation; security analysis for investment and corporate finance. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Damodaran A. (2012): Instrument valuation; tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
  • Dudycz T. (2005): Zarządzanie wartością przedsiębiorstwa. PWE Warszawa.
  • Fernandez P. (2015): WACC: definition, misconceptions and errors. (access: 15.03.2017).
  • Gentry J.A., Reilly F.K. (2007): Estimating the intrinsic value of an enterprise with an integrated financial management system. (access: 15.03.2017).
  • Gentry J.A., Reilly F.K., Sandretto M.J. (2003): Learning about intrinsic valuation with the help of an integrated valuation model. (access: 15.03.2017).
  • Głębocki M., Grudziński M., Kundera M., Sylwestrzak M. (2011): Studies of valuation methodology used in the stock exchange recommendations summary. In: Inwestycje, wycena przedsiębiorstw, zarządzanie wartością. Ed. D. Zarzecki. Zeszyty Naukowe. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, nr 37(639), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin, pp. 575-588.
  • Grzywacz J. (2012): Kapitał w przedsiębiorstwie i jego struktura. SGH, Warszawa.
  • Hitchner J.R. (2006): Financial valuation. Applications and models. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
  • Kuczowic J. (2012): Wycena małego przedsiębiorstwa. CeDeWu, Warszawa.
  • Kuczowic J. (2014): Zmienne oblicza WACC. In: Inwestycje i nieruchomości. Wybrane zagadnienia. Ed. K. Marcinek. Studia Ekonomiczne, nr 177, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego, Katowice, pp. 168-186.
  • Larkin P.J. (2011): To iterate or not iterate? Using the WACC in equity valuation. “Journal of Business & Economics Research”, Vol. 9, No. 11, pp. 29-34, DOI:
  • Malinowska U. (2001): Wycena przedsiębiorstwa w warunkach polskich. Difin, Warszawa.
  • Matschke M.J., Brösel G. (2011): Wycena przedsiębiorstwa; Funkcje, metody, zasady. Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.
  • Mills R.W. (1998): The dynamics of shareholder value; the principles and practice of strategic value analysis. Mars Business Associates, Lechlade.
  • Modigliani F., Miller M.H. (1958): The cost of capital; corporation finance and the theory of investment. “The American Economic Review”, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 261-297.
  • Modigliani F., Miller M.H. (1963): Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. “The American Economic Review”, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 433-443.
  • Mohanty P. (2007): Solving the circularity problem in estimating the cost of capital: A practical approach. “The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance”, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 29-38.
  • Panfil M., Szablewski A., ed. (2014): Wyceny spółek z WIG30. Poltext, Warszawa.
  • Pęksyk M. (2012): Cost of capital calculation. In: Business valuation: A basic approach. Ed. M. Panfil, A. Szablewski. Poltext, Warsaw.
  • Pratt S.P., Grabowski R.J. (2008): Cost of capital: Applications and examples. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
  • Rao R.K.S., Stevens E.C. (2007): A theory of the firm’s cost of capital. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
  • Rappaport A. (1986): Creating shareholder value; the new standard for business performance. The Free Press, New York.
  • Wiśniewski T. (2008): Errors in estimation of cost of capital in investment appraisal and their significance. “Operations Research and Decisions”, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 107-116.
  • [www 1] (access: 15.03.2017).
  • [www 2] (access: 15.03.2017).
  • [www 3] (access: 15.03.2017).
  • [www 4] (access: 15.03.2017).
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.