Skip to main menu
Scroll to content
Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Link to site
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Standards of Entrepreneur Rights in Competition Proceedings – a Matter of Administrative or Criminal Law?
), p. 9-33
The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti-Competitive Agreements in EU Competition Law
Rosiak P. K.
), p. 11-135
The Nature of Responsibility of an Undertaking in Antitrust Proceedings and the Concept of ‘Criminal Charge’ in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
), p. 35-55
Competence of Common Courts in Poland in Competition Matters
), p. 57-71
The Scope of Application of the Provisions of the Administrative Procedure Code in Competition Enforcement Proceedings
), p. 73-89
Can the Right To Be Heard Be Respected without Access to Information about the Proceedings? Deficiencies of National Competition Procedure
), p. 91-110
Exchange of Information and Evidence between Competition Authorities and Entrepreneurs’ Rights
), p. 137-167
Rights of an Undertaking in Proceedings Regarding Commitment Decisions under Article 9 of Regulation No. 1/2003
), p. 169-192
Legal Professional Privilege and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in EU Competition Law after the Lisbon Treaty – Is It Time for a Substantial Change?
), p. 193-214
Procedural Autonomy of Member States and the EU Rights of Defence in Antitrust Proceedings
), p. 215-234
EU Courts’ Jurisdiction over and Review of Decisions Imposing Fines in EU Competition Law
), p. 235-259
Standard of Judicial Review of Merger Decisions Concerning Oligopolistic Markets
), p. 261-288
Concurrence of wills – a necessary ingredient of an agreement restricting competition Case comment to the judgment of Court of Competition and Consumer Protection of 8 February 2011 - ZST Gamrat S.A. v President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (Ref. No. XVII Ama 16/10)
Górska M. A.
), p. 289-295
The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict? Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)
), p. 297-311