Climate Justice and Climate Policy

• Authors: Felix Ekardt
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

A research on climate change needs normative visions and principles to provide orientation and to line up normative requirements. This may enable to provide a comprehensive view on energy and climate topics. This contribution, while dealing with justice, gives a perspective from ethics respectively from a (re)interpretation of national constitutions, the EU Charter of fundamental rights and the European convention on human rights in the light of sustainability. It takes us to human rights as the basic norm of any liberal democratic constitution (on national and transnational level), but criticizes the academic international law debate (unlike the practice of international law) which seems to be focused on the idea of even absolute, i.e. not subject to any balancing, environmental fundamental rights. Overall, it turns out that an interpretation of fundamental rights which is more multipolar and considers the conditions for freedom more heavily – as well as the freedom of future generations and of people in other parts of the world – develops a greater commitment to climate protection. Regarding the theory of balancing, for the purpose of a clear balance of powers the usual principle of proportionality also proves specifiable.

• Publisher: Komisja Socjologii Morskiej - Filia Oddziału Gdańskiego w Szczecinie Polskiej Akademii Nauk
• Journal: Roczniki Socjologii Morskiej
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 21
• Pages: 4-17

Contributors

author

Felix Ekardt

• University of Rostock and Director of the Research Unit Sustainability and Climate Policy in Leipzig

References

• Alexy, R. (1991), Theorie der juristischen Argumentation, 2nd edition, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Calliess, Ch. (2001), Rechtsstaat und Umweltstaat, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
• Donnelly, J. (1993), “Third generation rights”, in: C. Brölmann, R. Lefeber, M. Zieck (eds.), Peoples and Minorities in International Law, Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
• Ekardt, F. (2011), Theorie der Nachhaltigkeit: Rechtliche, ethische und politische Zugänge – am Beispiel von Klimawandel, Ressourcenknappheit und Welthandel, 2nd edition, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
• Ekardt, F., von Bredow, H. (2011), “Managing the ecological and social ambivalences of bioenergy – sustainability criteria versus extended carbon markets”, in: Walter Leal (ed.), The Economic, Social, and Political Aspects of Climate Change, Springer: Berlin.
• Gibson, N. (1990), “The Right to a Clean Environment”, Saskatchewan Law Review 1 (54): 5-17. Habermas, J. (1985), The Theory of Communicative Action, London: Beacon Press.
• Kromarek, P. (1987) (Ed.), Environnement et droits de l’homme, Paris: UNESCO.
• Nickel, J. (1993), “The human right to a safe environment: philosophical perspectives on its scope and justification”, Yale Journal of International Law, 18, 281–296.
• Ott, K., Döring, R. (2004), Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit, Marburg: Metropolis. Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge/Mass.: University Press.
• Steinberg, R. (1998), Der ökologische Verfassungsstaat, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
• Susnjar, D. (2011), Proportionality, Fundamental Rights, and Balance of Powers, Brill: Leiden. Unnerstall, H. (1999), Rechte zukünftiger Generationen, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.