Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 5 | 22-30

Article title

Občanská vybavenost malých obcí: diagnóza, standardy, plánování

Title variants

EN
Public amenities in small settlements: diagnosis, standards and planning

Languages of publication

CS

Abstracts

CS
Občanská vybavenost malých obcí je důležitým tématem plánování rozvoje venkova a stává se též častým tématem kampaní na podporu venkova. Dosud ale v České republice nebyla zpracována podrobná empirická analýza reálné vybavenosti obcí a jejího vývoje v čase. Článek poskytuje základní kvantitativní evidenci o občanské vybavenosti malých obcí, její časové dynamice a základních faktorech, které vybavenost ovlivňují. Na základě těchto údajů autoři navrhují koncept „běžného standardu vybavenosti“ jako nástroje umožňujícího hodnocení míry vybavenosti jednotlivých obcí a dále představují veřejně přístupný online nástroj „kalkulačka vybavenosti“ sloužící pro porovnání míry vybavenosti obcí mezi sebou.
EN
This article provides a basic quantitative record of public amenities in small settlements, their dynamics in time and basic relevant factors. Based on these data, the authors propose a concept for a ‘common standard of facilities’ as a tool for assessing the level of local amenities and as a publicly accessible online tool for comparison of the level of these facilities in individual settlements. The basic findings of the analyses indicate that there is an immediate relation between quality and number of inhabitants. The probability that a settlement provides a wider sphere of services is higher in more populated municipalities, although such an increase is not linear for all types of services. The most frequent services and infrastructures are playgrounds and sports fields, grocer’s shops, restaurants and pubs, and kindergartens and primary schools. The median size of a settlement in the Czech Republic is approximately 430 inhabitants. It can be expected that a typical median settlement has a playground, a grocer’s shop and a restaurant or pub. There will probably be a kindergarten and a primary school in many of them, but schooling institutions are not the common standard. A typical suburban settlement is less well equipped than a peripheral settlement of the same population. The level of such facilities has been relatively stable over the last two decades, although the proportion of places equipped with a grocer’s shop is in decline, resulting in a variety of subsidy programmes aimed at protecting shops in villages. The number of doctors’ surgeries is also in decline. By contrast, more and more settlements are equipped with a sports field.

Year

Issue

5

Pages

22-30

Physical description

Contributors

author
  • Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Department of Sociology, Philosophical Faculty, University of Hradec Králové

References

  • AUTTI, O. & HYRY-BEIHAMMER, E. K. (2014) School Closures in Rural Finnish Communities. In: Journal of Research in Rural Education, 29 (1) s. 1–17.
  • BARAKAT, B. (2015) A ‘recipe for depopulation’? School closures and local population decline in Saxony. In: Population, Space and Place, 21 (8) s. 735–753.
  • BERNARD, J. (2019) There is a need to restore services and grocery stores to our countryside…”: discourse on rural peripheralisation in Czechia against the background of rural socioeconomic development. s. 429–439 In: CAMPRAG, N. & SURI, A. (eds.). Three Decades of Post-Socialist Transition. Conference Proceedings. Urbanmorphosislab, TU Darmstadt.
  • BERNARD, J., DECKER, A., KYSELOVIČ, J., ŠIMON, M., JOUKL, M., TLČIMUKOVÁ, P., VÍTKOVÁ, L. (2020) Občanská vybavenost v malých obcích. Výzkumná zpráva, Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.
  • ELSHOF, H. & BAILEY, A. (2015) The role of responses to experiences of rural population decline in the social capital of families. In: Journal of Rural Community Development, 10 (1), s. 72–93.
  • CHRISTIAANSE, S. & HAARTSEN, T. (2017) The influence of symbolic and emotional meanings of rural facilities on reactions to closure: The case of the village supermarket. In: Journal of Rural Studies, 54, s. 326–336.
  • CHRISTIAANSE, S. & HAARTSEN, T. (2020) Experiencing place-change: A shared sense of loss after closure of village facilities. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101432.
  • CHROMÝ, P., JANČÁK, V., MARADA, M. & HAVLÍČEK, T. (2011). Venkov – žitý prostor: regionální diferenciace percepce venkova představiteli venkovských obcí v česku. In: Geografie, 116 (1), s. 23–45.
  • MAIER, K. (2016) Metodika Standardy dostupnosti veřejné infrastruktury, MMR.
  • MAIER, K. & ŠINDLEROVÁ, V. (2018) Dostupnost veřejných infrastruktur. In: Urbanismus a územní rozvoj 21 (2), s. 14–25.
  • MMR (2019) Koncepce rozvoje venkova. Online, staženo dne 29. 6. 2021 z: https://www.mmr.cz/getmedia/279d5264-6e9e-4f80-ba4a-c15a26144cd0/Koncepce-rozvoje-venkova_202001.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf.
  • MMR (2020) Strategie regionálního rozvoje ČR 2021+. Online, staženo dne 29. 6. 2021 z: https://mmr.cz/getmedia/58c57a22-202d-4374-af5d-cbd8f9454adb/SRR21.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf
  • POSPĚCH, P., SPĚŠNÁ, D. & STAVENÍK, A. (2015). Images of a Good Village: A Visual Analysis of the Rural Idyll in the „Village of the Year” Competition in the Czech Republic. In: European Countryside, 7(2), s. 68–86.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-61d87e82-0cca-44ce-9dc0-635bb87d8c84
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.