INTERPRETAČNÉ NEJASNOSTI SÚVISIACE S MOŽNOSTOU UZAVRETIA ZMIERU V PRIESTUPKOVOM KONANÍ (EŠTE JEDEN PRÍSPEVOK DO DISKUSIE)

• Authors: Tomaš Lukáš

Title variants

EN

Interpretation unclear related to the possibility of conclusion of settlement in criminal proceedings (one more post for the discussion)

• Languages of publication: SK

Abstracts

EN

Slovak administrative punishment has long lacked comprehensive legal regulation, both from the point of view of substantive law and procedural law. This results in several interpretive ambiguities. One of the ambiguities in question is related to conciliation in misdemeanour proceedings. Some attention has already been paid to the issue of the possibility of conciliation in criminal proceedings in the current scientific literature. Scientific opinions on the possibilities of resolving a misdemeanour case through reconciliation, excluding the offense of defamation according to § 78 of the Act of the Slovak National Council No. 372/1990 Coll. on offenses as amended, are not uniform and differ. The aim of this contribution is to follow up on the currently produced scientific discourse in the subject area, to develop it substantively and ideologically, and to bring arguments in favour of the possibility of amicable disposal of several cases regulated by the tort law of public administration.

Keywords

EN

ADMINISTRATIVE DELICT; ADMINISTRATIVE PUNISHMENT; RECONCILIATION; MISDEMEANOUR; ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE; SLOVAKIA

• Publisher: Institute of State and Law of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 106
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 251 – 262

Contributors

author

Tomaš Lukáš

• Právnická fakulta UPJŠ v Košiciach, Košice, Slovak Republic

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31577/pravnyobzor.2023.3.06