PL EN


2007 | 2 | 2 | 61-78
Article title

Historyzm i uprawomocnienie. Alasdaira MacIntyre’a historystyczna koncepcja uprawomocnienia

Selected contents from this journal
Title variants
EN
Historism and Justification. Alasdair MacIntyre’s Historicists Conception of Justification
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
In this paper I argue that MacIntyre’s historicism involves a conception concerning the nature of justification, formulated in opposition to ahistorical foundationalism. According to foundationalism justification is a matter of an appeal to certain universal and ahistorical principles, constituting the basis of all claims to knowledge. The merit of MacIntyre’s historicism is that it enables one to answer two difficulties, insuperable to foundationalism. First, it enables to explain why some basic statements are being treated as justified even though there exist, in the same area, contending sets of basic statements: justified basic statements are those which emerge from the history of a given tradition of enquiry as incontestable. Secondly, it allows to explain how we can rationally claim that a certain set of statements is rationally better than others even though they are mutually incommensurable: certain set of statements is better than others, and therefore justified, if and only if it can resolve difficulties insuperable to its rivals and explain both successes and defeats of its rivals.
Keywords
Year
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
61-78
Physical description
Contributors
  • Katedra Historii Filozofii Nowożytnej i Współczesnej, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-7e296c69-e242-490a-93ac-9004bc8bb833
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.