Gioele e Amos in dialogo secondo Massimiliano Scandroglio

• Authors: Zawadzki Arnold

Title variants

PL

Joel i Amos w dialogu według Massimiliano Scandroglio

• Languages of publication: IT

Abstracts

IT

La tesi dottorale di Massimiliano Scandroglio Gioele e Amos in dialogo. Inserzioni redazionali di collegamento e aperture interpretative, difesa al Pontificio Istituto Biblico di Roma il 4 giugno 2010, è uno studio articolato in due parti: nella prima parte il capitolo 4 di Gioele viene messo a confronto con alcuni versetti dei capitoli 1 e 9 del libro di Amos. I titoli dei rispettivi capitoli si riferiscono alle seguenti pericopi: Gl 4, 1–3 → Am 9, 13–15; Gl 4, 4–8 → Am 1, 3–2, 16; Gl 4, 9–17 → Am 1, 2; Gl 4, 18–21 → Am 9, 13–15, sebbene de facto ne vengano studiati soltanto alcuni versetti o espressioni. Dopo l’analisi dei versetti scelti, fatta nella prima parte del libro, l’Autore – nella seconda – propone una serie di riflessioni su due temi (il Giorno di JHWH in Gl 1, 15–20; 2, 1–11; 3, 1–5; 4, 1–3.9–17 e in Am 2, 6–16; 6, 1–7; 9, 1–4; 5, 18–20; e il rapporto tra Israele e le nazioni in Gl 4 e in Am 1–2; 3, 1–2; 6, 1–7; 9, 7–10), che costituiscono, a suo dire, “la base tematica”, su cui Gioele entra in dialogo con Amos. Nella Conclusione (pp. 339–367) viene offerta la panoramica generale sul cosiddetto “approccio intertestuale” e sulle conseguenze che esso ha per l’esegesi di Gioele ed Amos. Alla fine si trovano Bibliografia, Indice biblico e Indice degli autori.

PL

Artykuł jest próbą zrecenzowania książki Massimiliano Scandroglio Gioele e Amos in dialogo. Inserzioni redazionali di collegamento e aperture interpretative, opublikowanej nakładem Gregorian&Biblical Press w 2011 r. Książka wpisuje się w dość popularny w dzisiejszej biblistyce nurt egzegezy intertekstualnej, która jest nową odsłoną starej metody porównawczej, badającej związki i zależności pomiędzy poszczególnymi księgami biblijnymi i tym samym proces ich powstawania. Scandroglio skupia swoją uwagę przede wszystkim na rozdziale 4. Księgi Joela i konfrontuje go z rozdziałami 1. i 9. Księgi Amosa. De facto, wnikliwej analizie intertekstualnej zostają poddane następujące perykopy: Jl 4, 1–3/Am 9, 13–15; Jl 4, 4–8/Am 1, 3–2,16; Jl 4, 9–17/Am 1, 2; Jl 4, 18–2/Am 9, 13–15. Ponadto wychodząc od literackich związków między dwoma prorokami, Autor stara się uchwycić podobieństwa i różnice w ich przesłaniu teologicznym, czemu poświęcona jest druga część książki. Na uwagę czytelnika zasługuje przede wszystkim obszerna analiza dwóch teologicznych tematów, a mianowicie motyw „Dnia Pańskiego” i relacja Izraela z obcymi narodami. W Zakończeniu Autor stara się ukazać metodę intertekstualną w jej historycznym rozwoju i wpływ, jaki ma ona obecnie na egzegezę Księgi Joela i Amosa.

EN

This article attempts to review a book by Massimiliano Scandroglio Gioele e Amos in dialogo. Inserzioni redazionali di collegamento e aperture interpretative which was published by Gregorian&Biblical Press w 2011. This book forms a part of the trend of intertextual exegesis which is popular in contemporary Bible studies. It is a new version of the old comparative method which researches the relations and interdependencies between individual books of the Bible and consequently the process of their formation. Scandroglio focuses mostly on the chapters 4 of the book of Joel and 1 and 9 of Amos. He thoroughly analyses the following excerpts: Jl 4, 1–3/Am 9, 13–15; Jl 4, 4–8/Am 1, 3–2, 16; Jl 4, 9–17/Am 1, 2; Jl 4, 18–2/Am 9, 13–15. Starting from literary connections between the two prophets, the author tries to find similarities and differences in their theological message and he devotes the second part of his book to this subject. Two theological subjects are particularly noteworthy: the topic of the Day of the Lord and the relation between Israel and gentile nations. In conclusion the author tries to present the intersexual method, its historic development and the influence which it currently has on the exegesis of the books of Joel and Amos.

Keywords

IT

Amos; Gioele; intertestualità; giorno del Signore; Israele e le nazioni; Profeti Minori

PL

Amos; Joel; intertekstualność; dzień Pański; Izrael i narody; Prorocy Mniejsi

EN

Amos; Joel; intertextual; the day of the Lord; Israel and nations; minor prophets

• Publisher: Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
• Journal: Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 23
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 121-127

Contributors

author

Zawadzki Arnold

• Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne, Łódź

References

• Aichele G., Philips G.A., Introduction: Exegesis, Eisegesis, Intergesis, in: Intertextuality and the Bible, Semeia 69/70 (1995) 7–18.
• Barton J., Joel and Obadiah, (OTL) Louisville 2001.
• Beal T.K., Ideology and Intertextuality: Surplus of Meaning and Controlling the Means of Production, in: Reading between Texts. Intertextuality and the Hebrew Bible, ed. H.N. Fewell, Louisville 1992, 27–39.
• Bergler S., Joel als Schriftinterpret, (BEAT 16) Frankfurt a. M. 1988.
• Buchanan G.W., Introduction to Intertextuality, New York 1994.
• Harper W.R., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Amos and Hosea, New York 1905.
• Mai H-P., Bypassing Intertextuality: Hermeneutics, textual Practice, Hypertext, in: Intertextuality, ed. H. Plett, (Untersuchungen zur Texttheorie 15) New York 1992, 30–59.
• Mettinger T.N.D., Intertextuality: Allusion and Some Vertical Context Systems in Some Job Passages, in: Of Prophets’ Visions and Wisdom of the Sages. Essays in Honour of R. Norman Whybray on his Seventieth Birthday, ed. H.A. McKay, D.J.A. Clines, (JSOTS) Sheffield 1993, 257–280.
• Morgan Th.E., Is There an Intertext in This Text?: Literary and Interdisciplinary Approaches to Intertextuality, American Journal of Semiotics 3/4 (1985) 1–40.
• Nielsen K., Intertextuality and Biblical Scholarship, SJOT 2 (1990) 89–95.
• Paul Sh.M., Amos. A Commentary on the Book of Amos, (Hermeneia) Philadelphia 1991.
• Simian-Yofre H., Amos. Nuova versione, introduzione e commento, (PT) Milano 2002.
• Willi-Plein I., Vorformen der Schriftexegese innerhalb des Alten Testamens. Untersuchungen zum literarischen Werden der auf Amos, Hosea und Micha, zurückgehenden Bücher im hebräischen Zwölfpropheten Buch (BZAW), Berlin 1971.
• Pfister M., How Postmodern is Intertextuality?, in: Intertextuality, ed. Plett H., (Untersuchungen zur Texttheorie 15), New York 1991, 207–223.