2018 | 32 | 102-117
Article title

Strategizing routine revisited: theoretical roots, determinants, and consequences

Title variants
Languages of publication
Aim/purpose – The aim of the paper is to review the routine aspect in strategizing process exposing strategizing routines. Consequently, the main aim is to enhance understanding of the commonness, meanings and dissemination of the concept and idea of the routine in strategizing process. Design/methodology/approach – Narrative, thematic literature review method is adopted, representing a qualitative methodology as appropriate because it is useful in pulling routine research and strategizing research together into general format. It helps in presenting two perspectives embraced in this paper by discussing theory and context to provoke thought and even a controversy. Findings – The conclusions drawn from the presented review explicate the importance of routine in strategy process as well as routine as practice and its associations with workers in strategy. Research implications/limitations – The research shed light on specific aspects of strategizing routines. The main value added of our paper is that it draws from the extant literature to provide with a comprehensively updated picture of how strategy-as-practice and routine theory can serve, as a useful research approach, to the studies about strategic choice. The presumable limitation is due to methodology adopted. Originality/value/contribution – The paper exploits two important management approaches in order to explicate organizational behavior, especially strategy process and strategizing, by investigating organizational routines. Thus, routine appears an adequate natural fundament since routines grasp systematic and endogenous character of the organization. Therefore, the concept of organizational routines is one to consider in the strategy research, to indicate the role that routines have in the process of strategizing in specific.
Physical description
  • Department of Strategy and Management Methods. Faculty of Management, Computer Science and Finance. Wroclaw University of Economics, Wrocław, Poland
  • Argyris, C. (1985). Strategy, change and defensive routines. Boston: Pitman Publishing.
  • Barton, L. C., & Ambrosini, V. (2013). The moderating effect of organizational change cynicism on middle manager strategy commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(4), 721-746. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2012.697481
  • Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643-677. doi: 10.1093/icc/dth026
  • Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1-22.
  • Coad, A., & Timmermans, B. (2014). Coordinated unbundling: A way to stimulate entrepreneurship through public procurement for innovation. Science and Public Policy, 40(5), 674-685. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct023
  • Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94-118. doi: 10.2307/3556620
  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Grinyer, P. H., & McKiernan, P. (1990, Summer). Generating major change in stagnating companies. Strategic Management Journal, 131-146.
  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. doi: 10.2307/258434
  • Hansen, N., & Küpper, W. (2008). Stability and change in strategizing routines: A practice- theoretical approach to strategic HRM systems. Paper presented at the 24th EGOS Colloquium 2008, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Retrieved from
  • Hart, Ch. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Hendry, J., & Seidl, D. (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 175-196. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00008
  • Howard-Grenville, J. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16, 618-636. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0150
  • Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 23-55. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00003
  • Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529-560. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040675
  • Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London: Sage.
  • Jarzabkowski, P. (2008). Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 621-650.
  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Fenton, E. (2006). Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts. Long Range Planning, 39(6), 631-648. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2006.11.002
  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). A rhetoric-in-context approach to building commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organization Studies, 28, 1639-1665. doi: 10.1177/0170840607075266
  • Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1), 5-27.
  • Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view? Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3-22. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486
  • Menuhin, J., & McGee, J. (2014, June). Strategizing routines in HSBC (UK). Paper presented at the DRUID Society Conference 2014, CBS, Copenhagen.
  • Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M. J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 935-955. doi: 10.1002/smj.615
  • Neill, S., & Rose, G. (2007). Achieving adaptive ends through equivocality. A study of organizational antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 60(4), 305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.020
  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273. doi: 10.1287/orsc.
  • Paroutis, S., & Heracleous, L. (2013). Discourse revisited: Dimensions and employment of first order strategy discourse during institutional adoption. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 935-956. doi: 10.1177/0018726715625343
  • Pentland, B., & Feldman, M. (2007). Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 781-795. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0283
  • Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T., & Hillison, D. (2011). The (n)ever-changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organization Science, 22(6), 1369-1383. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0624
  • Perkins, W., & Rao, R. (1990). The role of experience in information use and decision making by marketing managers. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 1-10.
  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practice: A development in cultural theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263. doi: 10.1177/13684310222225432
  • Rocco, T. S., & Plakhotnik, M. S. (2008). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 120-130.
  • Seidl, D. (2007). General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: A systemic discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 28(2), 197-218. doi: 10.1177/0170840606067994
  • Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613-634. doi: 10.1177/0170840606064101
  • Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis-Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22, 531-544. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00762.x
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.