DÔSLEDKY PRÁVNEHO PLURALIZMU PRE PRÁVNICKÚ METODOLÓGIU

• Authors: Bárány Eduard

Title variants

EN

Consequences of legal pluralism for legal methodology

• Languages of publication: SK

Abstracts

EN

The basic idea of this paper reads that legal pluralism leads to changes in the legal methodology consisting of three parts: 1. methodology of law-making, 2. methodology of implementation of law including interpretation, 3. methodology of legal science (jurisprudence). In the process of law-making other legal systems operative on the same territory are already taken into account. Different legal systems have partially different canons of interpretation, and so in the situation of legal pluralism when it is necessary to apply rules belonging to more than one legal system, there are new challenges for traditional methods of interpretation. Jurisprudence is confronted with the task to conceptualise simultaneous operation of different legal systems on the systems on the same territory and different concepts (definitions) of law and to accommodate its methods to the changes in the subject of study.

Keywords

EN

LEGAL PLURALISM; LAW-MAKING; INTERPRETATION METHODOLOGY; LEGAL SCIENCE

• Publisher: Institute of State and Law of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 103
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 258 – 270

Contributors

author

Bárány Eduard

• Ústav štátu a práva SAV, Bratislava, Slovak Republic