PL EN


2016 | 71 | 8 | 644 – 655
Article title

JE POPPEROVA FALZIFIKOVATEĽNOSŤ KRITÉRIOM DEMARKÁCIE?

Authors
Content
Title variants
EN
Is Popper’s falsifiability the demarcation criterion?
Languages of publication
SK
Abstracts
EN
The paper highlights Popper’s falsifiability as the demarcation criterion neither of science nor of empirical science, but of empirical content. The difference is of utmost importance for several reasons. First, it shows that the most widespread criticisms of Popper’s criterion are misguided. Second, it sheds new light on the relations between being empirical and being scientific. Third, it explains what still remains typical of empiricism after it has been purged from the three dogmas as described by Quine and Davidson. The paper elaborates on all the three points.
Year
Volume
71
Issue
8
Pages
644 – 655
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Katedra filozofie FF UMB, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-8c7750bc-e049-436f-a378-fc0e88caed67
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.