PL EN


2013 | 50 | 1 | 27-41
Article title

On the Seeming Incompatibility Between Poetry and Philosophy

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Poetry as a mode of philosophizing can reasonably be considered a failure when making the following moves: from the experientially particular to general content (by means of abstract thought); from ordinary pre-reflective thinking (a contingent thought someone happened to have) to philosophically rigorous thought (which is rationally grounded); from domestic conceptions (connections of thought made by individual readers) to public conceptions (why these connections are relevant to our general, collective understanding). These problems arise when trying to meet the three main requirements of philosophical inquiry: generality, rationality, and justification. In order to show that the thinking involved in reading a poem is akin to the thinking involved in philosophical inquiry, poetry must make the right kind of moves in thought and meet these fundamental philosophical demands. In this article, the author offers a defence of the view that poetry can make a significant and valuable contribution to philosophical inquiry when faced with these three problems.
Contributors
author
  • University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-983ad33c-e2a7-451b-a191-551265fade1a
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.