2012 | 8 | 3 | 76-96
Article title

Family Changes in Iranian Kurdistan: A Mixed Methods Study of Mangor and Gawerk Tribes

Title variants
Languages of publication
Over the last few decades, the Iranian Kurdish society, including family and kin¬ship systems, has experienced enormous changes as a result of government im-plemented modernization efforts. This paper reports the results of a quantitative/ qualitative mixed methods study aimed at exploring (a) the nature of change in family and kinship systems and (b) how people understand and interpret these changes. The sample for this study was drawn from the Mangor and Gawerk tri¬bes residing in the Mahabad Township located in the West Azerbaijan Province of Iran. Using standardized questionnaires, 586 people were sampled as part of the quantitative portion of the study. For the qualitative portion, data was collected on 20 people using both in-depth interviews and participant observations. The quantitative data was analyzed by SPSS software and the qualitative data was in¬terpreted using grounded theory procedures. The quantitative findings showed that the urbanization, modern education, and mass media have all contributed to the emergence of a new form of family and kinship life. In addition, while sup¬porting quantitative findings, the qualitative results revealed that participants were aware of and sensitive to sources, processes, and effects of modernization on their family and kinship life.
Physical description
  • Abbasi-Shavazi, Mohammad J. and Peter McDonald. 2007. “Family Change in Iran: Religion, Revolution, and the State.” Pp. 177-198 in International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives, edited by R. Jayakody, A. Thornton and W. Axinn. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Al-Haj, Majid. 1988. “The Changing Arab Kinship Structure: The Effect of Modernization in an Urban Com¬munity.” The Economic Development and Cultural Change 36(2):237-258. Retrieved December 17, 2010 (http://www.
  • Al-Haj, Majid. 1995. “Kinship and Modernization in Developing Societies: The Emergence of Instrumentalized Kinship.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 26(3):311- 328. Retrieved December 17, 2010 (http://www.questia. com/googleScholar.qst?docId=5000365499).
  • Armaaki, Taghi A. and Tahereh Gazaei. 2000. “Studying Socio-Economic Developments in Three Generations of Tehranian Families.” Journal of Social Sciences Letter 16:3-29. Retrieved June 21, 2004 ( VEWSSID/J_pdf/50613791601.pdf).
  • Behnam, Jamshid. 1971. [Structures of Family and Kinship in Iran.] Tehran: Kharazmi Publisher. [Published in Persian].
  • Bergman, Manfred M. 2008. Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications. London: Sage.
  • Bernstein, Henry. 2002. “Modernization Theory and the Sociological Study of Development.” Journal of Develop¬ment Studies 7(2):141-160. Retrieved Octobr 17, 2008 (http:// documents/HenryBernstein-ModernizationSocio¬gyofDev.pdf).
  • Blaikie, Norman. 2007. Approaches to Social Inquiry. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Brannen, Julia. 1992. “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: An Overview.” Pp. 3-37 in Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research, edited by J. Brannen. Aldershot: Avebury.
  • Brewer, John and Albert Hunter. 1989. Multimethod Research: A synthesis of Styles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Brewer, John and Albert Hunter. 2006. Foundations of Multimethod Research: Synthesizing Styles. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bryman, Alan. 1988. Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.
  • Campbell, Donald T. and Donald W. Fiske. 1959. “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.” Psychological Bulletin 56(2):81-105. Retrieved September 5, 2010 (
  • Corbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
  • Creswell, John W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, John W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, John W. and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2007. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage.
  • Ember, Carol and Melvin Ember. 2002. Cultural Anthropology. 10th ed. New Jersey, NY: Prentice-Hall.
  • Ervin, Alexander M. 2000. Applied Anthropology: Tools and Perspectives for Contemporary Practice. Boston, MA: Allyn and Becon Press.
  • Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss. 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.
  • Good, William J. 1963. World Revolution and Family Patterns. London: Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Greene, Jennifer C. 2007. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publisher.
  • Heckmann, Lale. 1991. Tribe and Kinship among Kurds. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Press.
  • Hirschman, Charles and Huu Minh Nguyen. 2002. “Tradition and Change in Vietnemes Family Structure in The Red River Delta.” Journal of Marriage and Family 64(4):1063- 1079. Retrieved September 17, 2006 (¬eseFamilyStructure.pdf).
  • Hulme, David and Mark Turner. 1990. Sociology and Development. New York: Harvest Wheatsheaf.
  • Johnson, Burke and Larry B. Christensen. 2008. Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon Press.
  • Jones, Gavin W. 1981. “Malay marriage and change in peninsular Malaysia: three decades of change.” Population and Development Review 7(2):255-278. Retrieved Octo¬ber 22, 2009 (
  • Lajavardi, Haleh. 1997. Sakhtare Ghodrat Dar Khanewade. Unpublished M.A thesis, Department of Sociology, Tehran University, Iran.
  • Lesthaeghe, Ron. 1983. “A Century of Demographic and Cultural Change in Western Europe: An Exploration of Underlying Dimensions.” Population and Development Review 9(3):411-436. Retrieved November 7, 2009 (http://
  • Lesthaeghe, Ron and Johan Surkyn. 2002. “New Forms of Household Formation in Central and Eastern Eu¬ope: Are They Related to Newly Emerging Value Ori¬entations?” Interuniversity Papers in Demography, IPD-WP 2002-2. Brussels and Ghent: Interface Demog¬raphy.
  • Malhotra, Anju and Amy Ong Tsui. 1996. “Marriage Timing in Sri Lanka: The Role of Modern Norms and Ideas.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58(2):476-490. Retrieved August 13, 2010 (
  • McDonald, Peter. 2006. “Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy.” Population and Development Review 32(3):485-510. Retrieved June 27, 2009 (http://iussp2005.
  • McMichael, Philip. 2004. Development and Social Change. A Global Perspective. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  • Mikheeva, Anna. 2007. “Family Change and New Balance of Family Roles: The Case of Siberia.” International Review of Sociology 17(2):343-357. Retrieved December 4, 2011 (http://
  • Mohammadpur, Ahmad. 2001. Farayand va Payamadhaye Nosazi Dar Shahrestane Sardasht: Az 1300 ta 1379. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Sociology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Mohammadpur, Ahmad. 2007. Bazsazie Maanaeie Payamadhaye Nosazi Dar Mantaghe Ouramane Takhte Kurdistan Iran. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of So¬ciology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Mohammadpur, Ahmad, Rasoul Sadeghi, Mehdi Rezaei and Latif Partovi. 2009. “Motalee Tarkibie Taghirate Khanevade Dar Beine Ilate Gawerk va Man¬goor Mahabad.” Faslname Pajohesh Zanan 7(4):71-93. Retrieved May 13, 2009 ( PDF/61713880404.pdf).
  • Morgan, David. 1998. “Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research.” Qualitative Health Research 8:362-376. Retrieved June 9, 2009 ( emergent-methods-in-social-research/n8.xml).
  • Neuman, Lawrence W. 2006. Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon Press.
  • Newman, Isadore and Carolyn R. Benz. 1998. Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring The Interactive Continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Niglas, Katrin. 2004. The Combined Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Educational Research. Unpublished
  • PhD dissertation on Social Sciences, Department of Education, Tallinn Pedagogical University, Tallinn, Estonia.
  • Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Nancy L. Leech. 2005. “Taking the “Q” Out of Research: Teaching Research Methodology Courses Without the Divide Between Quantitative and Qualitative Paradigms.” Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 39(3):267-295. Retrieved December 4, 2011 (http://www.springerlink. com/content/v267h15758153h81/).
  • Peet, Richard and Elaine Hartwick. 1999. Theories of Development. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Saraei, Hasan. 2007. “Tadavom va Taghir Khanevade Dar Jarian Gozare Jamiati.” Journal of Population Association of Iran 1(2):37-60. Retrieved May 21, 2009 (ttp:// fa/ViewPaperFa.asp?ID=70301&varStr=4).
  • Scupin, Raymond and David McCurdy. 2004. Anthropology: A Global Perspective. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Press.
  • Seltzer, Judith A. et al. 2005. “Explaining Family Change and Variation: Challenges for Family Demographers.” Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4):908-925. Retrieved July 23, 2009 ( ExplainingFamilyChange_JMF2005_final2.pdf).
  • Seyyed Rabih, Farid. 2000. Barrasi Avamele Moaser Bar Tahavole Khanevade Gostarde Be Hastei Dar Tarikh Moaser Iran. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Demogra¬phy, Tehran University, Iran.
  • Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tashakkori, Abbas and Charles Teddlie. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Ap-proaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tashakkori, Abbas and Charles Teddlie. 2003. Handbook of Mixed Social and Behavioral Research Methods. Thou¬sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Teddlie, Charles and Fen Yu. 2007. “Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples.” Journal of Mixed Meth¬ods Research 1:77-100. Retrieved May 24, 2008. (http://mmr.
  • Teddlie, Charles and Abbas Tashakkori. 2009. Foundations of Mixed Method Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Techniques in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. London: Sage.
  • Thornton, Arland, Georgina Binstock and Dirgha Ghimire. 2004. “International Networks, Ideas, and Family Change.” Population Studies Center Research Report No. 04-566. Institute for Social Research, University of Michi¬gan. Retrieved December 4, 2011 (¬
  • Toren, Nina. 2003. “Tradition and Transition: Family Change in Israel.” Journal of Gender Issues 21(2):60-76. Retrieved June 27, 2010 ( HWAUKWYCALAEUNKP.pdf).
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.