Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2013 | 3-4(92-93) | 23-38

Article title

Problemy efektywności zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi

Content

Title variants

EN
Human Resource Management: Questions of Efficiency

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
HRM efficiency and effectiveness are rarely discussed in Polish literature in terms of economics or management studies. Mainly English terms—achievement, outcome, and performance—are applied in any description, measurement, or assessment of the behavior and actions of people in organizations. According to Corvellec [1997], they mainly serve to legitimize actions taken. The aim of this paper is to analyze the various aspects of the efficiency and effectiveness of HRM, with special stress on the context of small and medium enterprises, conducted from the point of view of non–identical theoretical paradigms. It serves to enrich the perceptive infrastructure of the personnel function in the organization.

Year

Issue

Pages

23-38

Physical description

Contributors

  • Poznań University of Economics, Poznań, Poland
  • Poznań University of Economics, Poznań, Poland

References

  • Barney J.B., Wright P.M (1998), On Becoming a Strategic Partner: The Role of Human Resources in Gaining Competitive Advantage, Human Resource Management, nr 37 (1).
  • Boon C., Den Hartog D.N., Boselie P., Paauwe J. (2011), The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: examining the role of person–organization and person-job fit, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, nr 22 (1).
  • Boselie P. (2010), Strategic Human Resource Management: A Balanced Approach, London, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  • Boselie P., Brewster Ch., Paauwe J. (2009), In search of balance – managing the dualities of HRM: an overview of the issues, Personnel Review, 38 (5).
  • Boselie P., Dietz G., Boon C. (2005), Commonalities and Contradictions in HRM and Performance Research, Human Resource Management Journal, nr 15.
  • Boxall P.F., Purcell J. (2003), Strategy and Human Resource Management, New York, Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Czarnota-Bojarska J. (2010), Dopasowanie człowiek-organizacja i tożsamość organizacyjna, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Cropanzano R., Mitchell M.S. (2005), Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review, Journal of Management, nr 31 (6).
  • Corvellec H. (1997), Stories of achievements: narrative features of organizational performance, Transaction Publishers, London.
  • Deephouse D.L., Suchman M. (2012), Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism, w The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London, SAGE Publications.
  • Delbridge R., Keenoy T. (2010), Beyond managerialism?, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, nr 21 (6).
  • DiMaggio P. (1997), Culture and Cognition, Annual Review of Sociology, nr 23 (1).
  • Edgar F., Geare A. (2005), HRM practice and employee attitudes: different measures – different results, Personnel Review, nr 34 (5).
  • Galang M., Elsik W., Russ G. (1999), Legitimacy in Human Resources Management, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 17.
  • Godard J. (2004), A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm, British Journal of Industrial Relations, nr 42 (2).
  • Grey Ch. (1994), Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline, Sociology, nr 28 (2).
  • Ingram T. (2010), Zależności pomiędzy politykami rekrutacji i selekcji a efektywnością organizacji w badaniach empirycznych, Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, nr 1.
  • Keegan A., Boselie P. (2006), The Lack of Impact of Dissensus Inspired Analysis on Developments in the Field of Human Resource Management, Journal of Management Studies, nr 43 (7).
  • Keenoy T. (1997), HRMism and the Languages of Re-presentation, Journal of Management Studies, nr 34 (5).
  • Keenoy T. (1999), HRM as Hologram: A Polemic, Journal of Management Studies, nr 36 (1).
  • Kochan T.A. (2008), Social Legitimacy of the HRM Profession: A US Perspective, w: Boxall P., Purcell J., Wright P.M., The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, Oxford University Press.
  • Miller C.C., Washburn N.T., Glick W.H. (2012), Perspective – The Myth of Firm Performance, Organization Science (17 lipca).
  • Mills Ch.W. (2007), Wyobraźnia socjologiczna, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Paauwe J. (2004), HRM and Performance: Achieving Long-term Viability, Oxford University Press.
  • Paauwe J. (2009), HRM and Performance: Achievements, Methodological Issues and Prospects, Journal of Management Studies, nr 46 (1).
  • Parzefall M-R., Coyle-Shapiro J. A-M. (2011), Making sense of psychological contract breach, Journal of Managerial Psychology, nr 26 (1).
  • Purcell J. (1999), High commitment management and the link with contingent workers: implications for strategic human resource management, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, nr 4, s. 239–257
  • Ramsay H., Scholarios D., Harley B. (2000), Employees and High-Performance Work Systems: Testing Inside the Black Box, British Journal of Industrial Relations, nr 38 (4).
  • Scherbaum Ch.A., Meade A.W. (2012), New Directions for Measurement in Management Research, International Journal of Management Reviews Scott W.R. (2001), Institutions and Organizations, London, SAGE.
  • Stor M. (2012), Continental Frameworks for HRM Effectiveness and Efficiency in MNCs: European, American, Asian, and African Perspectives, Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, nr 6 (89).
  • Sułkowski Ł. (2009), Paradygmaty nauk społecznych w zarządzaniu zasobami ludzkimi, Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, nr 6.
  • Townley B. (1997), The institutional logic of performance appraisal, Organization Studies, nr 18 (2).
  • Townley B. (1993), Foucault, Power/Knowledge, and Its Relevance for Human Resource Management, The Academy of Management Review, nr 18 (3).
  • Townley B. (1995), Managing By Numbers: Accounting, Personnel Management and the Creation of a Mathesis, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, nr 6 (6).
  • Terelak J.F., Jankowska P. (2009), Dopasowanie jednostka-organizacja a zadowolenie z pracy, Miscellanea Oeconomicae, nr 13 (1).
  • Watson T.J. (2010), Critical social science, pragmatism and the realities of HRM, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, nr 21 (6).
  • Weick K.E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, London, SAGE.
  • White M., Hill S., McGovern P., Mills C., Smeaton D. (2003), ‘High-performance’ Management Practices, Working Hours and Work–Life Balance, British Journal of Industrial Relations, nr 41 (2).
  • Winstanley D., Woodall J. (2000), The ethical dimension of human resource management, Human Resource Management Journal, nr 10.
  • Wright P., Nishii L.H. (2007), Strategic HRM and Organizational Behavior: Integrating Multiple Levels of Analysis, CAHRS Working Paper Serie (8 lutego).
  • Wright, P.M., Gardner, T.M. (2003), The human resource-firm performance relationship: Methodological and theoretical challenges, w Holman D., Wall T.D., Clegg C.W., Sparrow P., Howard A. (red.), The new workplace: A guide to the human impact of modern working practices, Chichester, Wiley.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-a81096d1-4f4e-4643-9095-be7d08dff06e
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.