PL EN


2010 | 1 | 1 | 39-45
Article title

An empirical comparison of different risk measures in portfolio optimization

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Risk is one of the important parameters in portfolio optimization problem. Since the introduction of the mean-variance model, variance has become the most common risk measure used by practitioners and researchers in portfolio optimization. However, the mean-variance model relies strictly on the assumptions that assets returns are multivariate normally distributed or investors have a quadratic utility function. Many studies have proposed different risk measures to overcome the drawbacks of variance. The purpose of this paper is to discuss and compare the portfolio compositions and performances of four different portfolio optimization models employing different risk measures, specifically the variance, absolute deviation, minimax and semi-variance. Results of this study show that the minimax model outperforms the other models. The minimax model is appropriate for investors who have a strong downside risk aversion.
Keywords
Year
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
39-45
Physical description
Contributors
author
author
  • Prague Development Center s.r.o., Bořivojova 1081 / 40, 130 00, Prague 3 - Žižkov, Czech Republic
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-ad44a899-8027-44f6-ab2f-fc859ee3f765
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.