The process of spatial knowledge acquisition in a square and a circular virtual environment

• Authors: Petra Jansen-Osmann , Martin Heil

Abstracts

EN

This study investigated the effect of the environmental structure (circular vs. square environment) on spatial knowledge acquisition in a desktop virtual situation in which self-determined movement was allowed with a total of 120 participants: 7-, 8-year-old children; 11, 12-year-old children, and adults. In all measurements of spatial knowledge acquisition an overall developmental performance increase from younger children to adults was found. In contrast to that, the exploration and learning behavior did not differ between adults and children. Furthermore, the environmental structure influenced the number of trials needed to learn the two routes used and the distance walked to the determined landmarks. All these tasks were easier in a circular than in a square environment. This influence of the environmental structure was absent in the direction estimations task. The advantage of spatial knowledge acquisition in a circular environment in three of four tasks is discussed.

Keywords

EN

spatial cognition; spatial knowledge; children; development; virtual environments

• Publisher: Wyższa Szkoła Finansów i Zarządzania w Warszawie
• Journal: Advances in Cognitive Psychology
• Year: 2007
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 389-397

Contributors

author

Petra Jansen-Osmann

• Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Germany

author

Martin Heil

• Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Germany

References

• Tlauka, M. (2007). Rotational movements in real and virtual environments.Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 515-524.
• Werner, S., & Schindler, L. E. (2004). The role of spatial reference frames in architecture: Misalignment impairs way-finding performance.Environment and Behaviour, 36, 461-482.
• Werner, S., & Schmidt, K. (1999). Environmental reference systems for large scale spaces.Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 447-473.
• Allen, G. L., & Ondracek, P. J. (1995). Age-sensitive cognitive abilities related to children's acquisition of spatial knowledge.Developmental Psychology, 31, 934-945.
• Allport, G., & Pettigrew, T. (1957). Cultural influence on the perception of movement: The trapezoidal illusion among the Zulus.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 104-113.[PubMed]
• Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects.Psychological Science, 17, 645-648.[PubMed]
• Canter, K., & Craig, D. (1981). Environmental psychology.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 1-11.
• Cohen, R., & Schuepfer, T. (1980). The representation of landmarks and routes.Child Development, 51, 1065-1071.
• Devlin, A. S., & Bernstein, J. (1995). Interactive wayfinding: Use of cues by men and women.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 23-38.
• Feldman, A., & Acredolo, L. (1979). The effect of active versus passive exploration on memory for spatial location in children.Child Development, 50, 698-704.[PubMed]
• Golledge, R. G. (1995).Defining the criteria used in path selection.Paper presented at the International Conference on Activity Scheduling, Eindhoven, NL.
• Hart, R. A., & Moore, G. T. (1973). The development of spatial cognition: A review. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.),Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior(pp. 246-288). Chicago: Aldine.
• Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual difference in aptitudetest performance and spatial layout learning.Intelligence, 34, 151-176.
• Herman, J. F., Blomquist, S. L., & Klein, C. A., (1987). Children's and adults' cognitive maps of very large unfamiliar environments.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 61-72.
• Herman, J. F., Kolker, R. C., & Shaw, M. L. (1982). Effects of motor activity on children's intentional and incidental memory for spatial locations.Child Development, 53, 239-244.[PubMed]
• Jansen-Osmann, P., & Fuchs, P. (2006). Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of landmarks.Experimental Psychology, 53, 171-181.[PubMed]
• Jansen-Osmann, P., Schmid, J., & Heil, M. (2007a). Spatial knowledge acquisition of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of the environmental structure.European Journal of Developmental Psychology.Retrieved April 26, 2007, fromhttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a777807105~db=all~order=pubdate
• Jansen-Osmann, P., Schmid, J., & Heil, M. (2007b). Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of the environmental structure.Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66, 41-50.
• Jansen-Osmann, P., & Wiedenbauer, G. (2004a). The representation of landmarks and routes in children and adults: A study in a virtual environment.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 347-357.
• Jansen-Osmann, P., & Wiedenbauer, G. (2004b). Wayfinding performance in and the spatial knowledge of a color-coded building for adults and children.Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4, 337-358.
• Jansen-Osmann, P., & Wiedenbauer, G. (2004c). The influence of turns on distance cognition: New experimental approaches to clarify the route-angularity effect.Environment and Behavior, 36, 790-813.
• Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationships to spatial ability and spatial anxiety.Sex Roles, 30, 765-779.
• Laurance, H. E., Learmonth, A. E., Nadel, L., & Jacobs, W. J. (2003). Maturation of spatial navigation strategies: Converging findings from computerized spatial environments and self report.Journal of Cognition and Development, 4, 211-238.
• Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J. J., & Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 557-564.
• Lynch, K. (1960).The image of the city.Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Montello, D. R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study.Environment and Behavior, 23, 47-69.
• Péruch, P., & Wilson, P. (2004). Active versus passive learning and testing in a complex outside built environment.Cognitive Processing, 5, 218-227.
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967).The Child's Conception of Space.New York: Norton.
• Plumert, J., Kearney, J., & Cremer, J. (2004). Distance perception in real and virtual environments. In H. Bülthoff & H. Rushmeier,Proceedings of the First Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization(pp 27-34). New York: INC.
• Ruddle, R. A., & Péruch, P. (2004). Effects of proprioceptive feedback and environmental characteristics on spatial learning in virtual environments.International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 60, 299-326.
• Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation.Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560-589.[PubMed]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10053-008-0003-6