Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2007 | 3 | 4 | 449-465

Article title

Electrophysiological activation by masked primes: Independence of prime-related and target-related activities

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

Languages of publication


Visual stimuli that are made invisible by metacontrast masking (primes) have a marked influence on behavioral and psychophysiological measures such as reaction time (RT) and the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). 4 experiments are reported that shed light on the effects that masked primes have on the LRP. Participants had a go-nogo task in which the prime was associated with 1 of 2 responses even if the target required participants to refrain from responding. To analyze the electrophysiological responses, we computed the LRP and applied an averaging method separating the activation due to the prime and the target. The results demonstrated that (a) masked primes activate responses even in a nogo situation, (b) this prime-related activation is independent of masking, (c) and is also independent of whether prime and target require the same responses (congruent condition) or different responses (incongruent condition).









Physical description


  • Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
  • Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
  • Department of Cognitive Science and Department of Psychology, University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany
  • Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany


  • Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach.New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update.Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1572-1595.[PubMed]
  • Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. (2006).Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision(2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition.Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.[PubMed]
  • Damian, M. F. (2001). Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: Automaticity rather than semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 154-165.[PubMed]
  • Dulany, D. E. (2001, March). Inattentional awareness.PSYCHE, 7(5). Retrieved from http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v7/psyche-7-05.dulany.htmlhttp://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v7/psyche-7-05.dulany.html
  • Eckstein, D., & Perrig, W. J. (in press). The influence of intention on masked priming: A study with semantic classification of words.Cognition.
  • Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 30, 146-156.
  • Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance.Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.[PubMed]
  • Jaśkowski, P., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Schlotterbeck, E., & Verleger, R. (2002). Traces left on visual selective attention by not consciously identified stimuli.Psychological Science, 13, 48-54.[PubMed]
  • Kiefer, M. (2002). The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: Further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects.Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 27-39.[PubMed]
  • Kiefer, M., & Brendel, D. (2006). Attentional modulation of unconscious semantic processes: Evidence from event-related potentials in masked priming paradigm.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1-15.[PubMed]
  • Kiefer, M., & Spitzer, M. (2000). Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain activation.Neuro Report, 11, 2401-2407.[PubMed]
  • Klauer, K. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Measurement error in subliminal perception experiments: Simulation analyses of two regression methods - Comment on Miller (2000).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1506-1508.
  • Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
  • Klotz, W., & Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus.Psychological Research, 58, 92-101.[PubMed]
  • Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition.Cognition, 88, 223-242.[PubMed]
  • Lamme, V. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing.Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.[PubMed]
  • Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials.Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
  • Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2001). Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology.Cognition, 79, 115-134.[PubMed]
  • Miller, J. (2000). Measurement error in subliminal perception experiments: Simulation analyses of two regression methods.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1461-1477.[PubMed]
  • Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention.Psychological Science, 13, 416-424.
  • Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli.Cognition, 80, 223-237.[PubMed]
  • Naccache, L., Gaillard, R., Adam, C., Hasboun, D., Clémenceau, S., Baulac, M., et al. (2005). A direct intracranial record of emotions evoked by subliminal words.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 7713-7717.[PubMed]
  • Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing(pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Neumann, O., & Scharlau, I. (2007). Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab effect and the ‘Weather Station Model’ of visual backward masking.Psychological Research, 71, 667-677.[PubMed]
  • Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, R. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time.Psychological Review, 102, 261-300.
  • Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional interpretation.Psychological Research, 67, 184-197.[PubMed]
  • Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2001). Partial response activation to masked primes is not dependent on response readiness.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 208-222.[PubMed]
  • Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2004). Masked stimuli can bias "free" choices between response alternatives.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 463-468.[PubMed]
  • Schmidt, T., Niehaus, S., & Nagel, A. (2006). Primes and targets in rapid chases: Tracing sequential waves of motor activation.Behavioural Neuroscience, 120, 1005-1016.[PubMed]
  • Schmidt, T., & Vorberg, D. (2006). Criteria for unconscious cognition: Three types of dissociation.Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 489-504.[PubMed]
  • Vath, N., & Schmidt, T. (2007). Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness potentials.Neuroscience, 145, 197-208.[PubMed]
  • Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2004). Invariant time-course of priming with and without awareness. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger & H. Müller (Eds.),Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition(pp. 271-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design(2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Wolff, P. (1989, April).Einfluß des maskierten Testreizes auf die Wahlreaktion auf den Metacontrast[The influence of the masked test-stimulus on reaction time on metacontrast]. Paper presented at the 31st Congress of Experimental Psychology, Bamberg, Germany.
  • Ansorge, U. (2004). Top-down contingencies of nonconscious priming revealed by dual-task interference.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1123-1148.[PubMed]
  • Ansorge, U., Breitmeyer, B. G., & Becker, S. I. (in press). Comparing sensitivity across different processing measures under metacontrast masking conditions.Vision Research.
  • Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2006). Shifts of visuo-spatial attention to invisible (metacontrast-masked) singletons: Clues from reaction times and event-related potentials.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 61-76.
  • Ansorge, U., Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1998). Manual and verbal responses to completely masked (unreportable) stimuli: Exploring some conditions for the metaconstrast dissociation.Perception, 27, 1177-1189.[PubMed]
  • Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2001). Intentions determine the effect of nonconsciously registered visual information: Evidence for direct parameter specification in the metacontrast dissociation.Proceedings of the AISB '01 Symposium on nonconscious intelligence: From natural to artificial(pp. 1-8). York, UK: AISB.
  • Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777.[PubMed]

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.