Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2007 | 3 | 1-2 | 211-226

Article title

Visual similarity in masking and priming: The critical role of task relevance

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

Languages of publication


Cognitive scientists use rapid image sequences to study both the emergence of conscious perception (visual masking) and the unconscious processes involved in response preparation (masked priming). The present study asked two questions: (1) Does image similarity influence masking and priming in the same way? (2) Are similarity effects in both tasks governed by the extent of feature overlap in the images or only by task-relevant features? Participants in Experiment 1 classified human faces using a single dimension even though the faces varied in three dimensions (emotion, race, sex). Abstract geometric shapes and colors were tested in the same way in Experiment 2. Results showed that similarityreducedthe visibility of the target in the masking task andincreasedresponse speed in the priming task, pointing to a double-dissociation between the two tasks. Results also showed that only task-relevant (not objective) similarity influenced masking and priming, implying that both tasks are influenced from the beginning by intentions of the participant. These findings are interpreted within the framework of a reentrant theory of visual perception. They imply that intentions can influence object formation prior to the separation of vision for perception and vision for action.








Physical description


  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Regina


  • Ansorge, U. (2004). Top-down contingencies of nonconscious priming revealed by dual-task interference.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1123-1148.[PubMed]
  • Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777.[PubMed]
  • Austen, E., & Enns, J. T. (2000). Change detection: Paying attention to detail.Psyche, 6, 11. http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/psyche-6-11-austen.htmlhttp://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/psyche-6-11-austen.html
  • Austen, E., & Enns, J. T. (2003). Change detection in an attended face depends on the expectation of the observer.Journal of Vision, 3, 64-74.[PubMed]
  • Bachmann, T., & Allik, J. (1976). Integration and interruption in the masking of form by form.Perception, 5, 79-97.[PubMed]
  • Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Breitmeyer, B. G., Öğmen, H., & Chen, J. (2004). Unconscious priming by color and form: Different processes and levels.Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 138-157.[PubMed]
  • Breitmeyer, B. G., Öğmen, H., Ramon, J., & Chen, J. (2005). Unconscious and conscious priming by forms and their parts.Visual Cognition, 12, 720-736.
  • Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgments of value.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 121-135.[PubMed]
  • Bridgeman, B. (1993). Efferent programming of the striate cortex. In K. H. Pribram (Ed.),Rethinking Neural Networks(pp. 487-503). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Carey, D.P. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusions?Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 109-113.[PubMed]
  • Castiello, U. (1996). Grasping a fruit: Selection for action.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 582-603.[PubMed]
  • Chua, R., & Enns, J. T. (2005). What the hand can't tell the eye: Illusion of space constancy during accurate pointing.Experimental Brain Research, 162, 109-114.[PubMed]
  • Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.[PubMed]
  • Cressman, E. K., Franks, I. M., Enns, J. T., & Chua, R., (2007). On-line control of pointing is modified by unseen visual shapes.Consciousness & Cognition, 16, 265-275.[PubMed]
  • Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 75-97.[PubMed]
  • Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.[PubMed]
  • Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J-I., Ghorashi, S. M., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control?Psychological Research, 69, 191-200.[PubMed]
  • Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., Flude, B. M., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Repetition priming of face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 193-210.[PubMed]
  • Enns, J. T. (2004). Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking.Vision Research, 44, 1321-1331.[PubMed]
  • Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of visual masking in unattended visual locations.Psychological Science, 8, 135-139.
  • Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345-352.[PubMed]
  • Enns, J. T., Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (in press). Object updating: A force for perceptual continuity and scene stability in human vision. In R. Nijhawan (Ed.),Problems of space and time in perception and action.Cambridge University Press.
  • Fehrer, E., & Raab, D. (1962). Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 143-147.[PubMed]
  • Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.[PubMed]
  • Ganel, T., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape.Nature, 426, 664-667.[PubMed]
  • Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement.Nature, 320, 748-75.[PubMed]
  • Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system.Neuron, 36, 791-804.[PubMed]
  • Huber, D. E., Shiffrin, R. M., Lyle, K. B., & Ruys, K. I. (2001). Perception and preference in short-term word priming.Psychological Review, 108, 149-182.[PubMed]
  • Jaśkowski, P., Skalska, B., & Verleger, R. (2003). How the self controls its "automatic pilot" when processing subliminal information.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911-920.[PubMed]
  • Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX(pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kawahara, J., Zuvic, S. M., Enns, J.T., & Di Lollo, V. (2003). Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking.Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 339-351.[PubMed]
  • Keysers, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 120-125.[PubMed]
  • Kim, C-Y., & Blake, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible 'invisible.'Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 381-388.[PubMed]
  • Klapp, S. T., & Hinkley, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255-269.[PubMed]
  • Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
  • Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475-493.[PubMed]
  • Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: A reply to Klapp (2005).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 436-440.
  • Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2006). How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming - A reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 495-500.[PubMed]
  • Lleras, A., Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Rapid resumption of an interrupted search: New insights on interactions of memory and vision.Psychological Science, 16, 684-688.[PubMed]
  • Lleras, A., Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (in press). Consequences of display changes during interrupted visual search: Rapid resumption is target-specific.Perception & Psychophsyics.
  • Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988).Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE) and Neutral Faces (JACNeuF).Report available from Intercultural and Emotion Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University.
  • McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168-180.[PubMed]
  • Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995).The visual brain in action.London: Oxford University Press.
  • Moore, C. M., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Object substitution and the flash-lag effect.Psychological Science, 15, 866-871.
  • Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive Psychology.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception.Psychological Research, 52, 207-215.[PubMed]
  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.[PubMed]
  • Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.[PubMed]
  • Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming.Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363.[PubMed]
  • Scheerer, E. (1973). Integration, interruption and processing rate in visual backward masking.Psychologische Forschung, 36, 71-93.[PubMed]
  • Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control.Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148-162.[PubMed]
  • Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2006). Active masks and active inhibition: A comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaśkowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 484-494.[PubMed]
  • Schmidt, T. (2002). The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli.Psychological Science, 13, 112-118.
  • Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicoeur, P. (2002). Blinded by headlights.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 65-74.[PubMed]
  • Sy, J., & Giesbrecht, B. (2006).Electrophysiological evidence for modulation of semantic processing during the attentional blink.Poster presented at the Annual Meetings of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
  • Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.[PubMed]
  • Theeuwes, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention(pp. 297-314). Washington, DC: APA.
  • Triesman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The 14th Bartlett Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.[PubMed]
  • Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.Psychological Review, 81, 1-52.[PubMed]
  • Verleger, R., Jaśkowski, P., Aydemir, A., Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Groen, M. (2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and non-conscious processing? On negative and positive priming effects induced by masked arrows.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494-515.[PubMed]
  • Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100, 6275-6280.[PubMed]
  • Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2004). Invariant time-course of priming with and without awareness. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. J. Müller (Eds.),Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition(271-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Weidemann, C. T., Huber, D. E., Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). Confusion and compensation in visual perception: Effects of spatiotemporal proximity and selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 40-61.[PubMed]

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.