Temporal processes in prime–mask interaction: Assessing perceptual consequences of masked information

• Authors: Ingrid Scharlau

Abstracts

EN

Visual backward masking is frequently used to study the temporal dynamics of visual perception. These dynamics may include the temporal features of conscious percepts, as suggested, for instance, by the asynchronous-updating model (Neumann, 1982) and perceptual-re-touch theory (Bachmann, 1994). These models predict that the perceptual latency of a visual backward mask is shorter than that of a like reference stimulus that was not preceded by a masked stimulus. The prediction has been confirmed by studies using temporal-order judgments: For certain asynchronies between mask and reference stimulus, temporal-order reversals are quite frequent (e.g. Scharlau, & Neumann, 2003a). However, it may be argued that these reversals were due to a response bias in favour of the mask rather than true temporal-perceptual effects. I introduce two measures for assessing latency effects that (1) are not prone to such a response bias, (2) allow to quantify the latency gain, and (3) extend the perceptual evidence from order reversals to duration/interval perception, that is, demonstrate that the perceived interval between a mask and a reference stimulus may be shortened as well as prolonged by the presence of a masked stimulus. Consequences for theories of visual masking such as asynchronous-updating, perceptual-retouch, and reentrant models are discussed.

Keywords

EN

masked priming; attention; visual backward masking; metacontrast; perceptual latency; perception of time

• Publisher: Wyższa Szkoła Finansów i Zarządzania w Warszawie
• Journal: Advances in Cognitive Psychology
• Year: 2007
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1-2
• Pages: 241-255

Contributors

author

Ingrid Scharlau

• Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Germany

References

• Bachmann, T. (1984). The process of perceptual retouch: Nonspecific afferent activation dynamics in explaining visual masking.Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 69-84.[PubMed]
• Bachmann, T. (1994).Psychophysiology of visual masking: The fine structure of conscious experience.Commack, N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers.
• Bachmann, T. (1999). Twelve spatiotemporal phenomena and one explanation. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.),Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. Advances in psychology(pp. 173-206). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.[PubMed]
• Elliott, M. A., Shi, Z., & Sürer, F. (in press). The effects of subthreshold synchrony on the perception of simultaneity.Psychological Research.[PubMed]
• Enns, J. T. (2002). Visual binding in the standing wave illusion.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 489-496.[PubMed]
• Enns, J. T. (2004). Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking.Vision Research, 44, 1321-1331.[PubMed]
• Finney, D. J. (1971).Probit analysis(3rd ed.). Cambridge: University Press.
• Hamker, F. (2006, June).The predictions of population-based inference for feature-inheritance and visual masking. Poster session at the International Workshop Visual Masking and the Dynamics of Vision and Consciousness, Delmenhorst, Germany.
• Hamker, F. H., (2007). The mechanisms of feature inheritance as predicted by a systems-level model of visual attention and decision making.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 111-123.http://www.ac-psych.org/index.php?id=2&rok=2007&issue=1-2
• Hays, W. L. (1988).Statistics(4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
• Herzog, M. H., Fahle, M., & Koch, C. (2001). Spatial aspects of object formation revealed by a new illusion, shine-through.Vision Research, 41, 2325-2335.[PubMed]
• Herzog, M. H., Koch, C., & Fahle, M. (2001). Shine-through: temporal aspects.Vision Research, 41, 2337-2346.[PubMed]
• Jaśkowski, P. (1991). Two-stage model for order discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 76-82.[PubMed]
• Jaśkowski, P. (1993). Selective attention and temporal-order judgment.Perception, 22, 681-689.[PubMed]
• Jaśkowski, P., van der Lubbe, R., Schlotterbeck, E., & Verleger, R. (2002). Traces left on visual selective attention by stimuli that are not consciously identified.Psychological Science, 13, 48-54.[PubMed]
• Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Asymmetric object substitution masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 895-918.[PubMed]
• Kiefer, M. (2002). The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: Further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects.Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 27-39.[PubMed]
• Kiefer, M. (2007). Top-down modulation of unconscious 'automatic' processes: A gating framework.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 289-306.http://www.ac-psych.org/index.php?id=2&rok=2007&issue=1-2
• Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
• Kolers, P. (1972).Aspects of movement perception.Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Braunschweig: Pergamon Press.
• Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (2003). When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 106-120.[PubMed]
• Mathematica 4.1 [Computer Software]. (2001). Champaign, Illinois: Wolfram Research Inc.
• Mattler, U. (2003). Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 167-187.[PubMed]
• Moore, C. M., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Object substitution and the flash-lag effect.Psychological Science, 15, 866-871.[PubMed]
• Neumann, O. (1978).Visuelle Aufmerksamkeit und der Mechanismus des Metakontrasts.Report No. 6/1978, Department of Psychology at the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Cognitive Psychology Unit. Abbreviated and translated version published as: Neumann, O., & Scharlau, I. (in press b). Visual attention and the mechanism of metacontrast.Psychological Research.[PubMed]
• Neumann, O. (1982).Experimente zum Fehrer-Raab-Effekt und das 'Wetterwart'-Modell der visuellen Maskierung. Report No. 24/1982, Department of Psychology at the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Cognitive Psychology Unit. Abbreviated and translated version published as: Neumann, O., & Scharlau, I. (in press a). Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab effect and the 'Weather Station Model' of visual backward masking.Psychological Research.[PubMed]
• Neumann, O., Esselmann, U., & Klotz, W. (1993). Differential effects of visual-spatial attention on response latency and temporal-order judgment.Psychological Research, 56, 26-34.[PubMed]
• Neumann, O., & Niepel, M. (2004). Timing of "perception" and perception of "Time". In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.),Psychophysics beyond sensation(pp. 245-270). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Pashler, H. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Reason, J. (1990).Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Reeves, A. (1982). Metacontrast U-shaped functions derive from two monotonic functions.Perception, 11, 415-426.[PubMed]
• Reeves, A. (1986). Pathways in type-B metacontrast.Perception, 15, 163-172.[PubMed]
• Scharlau, I. (2002). Leading, but not trailing, primes influence temporal order perception: Further evidence for an attentional account of perceptual latency priming.Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1346-1360.[PubMed]
• Scharlau, I. (2004). Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.Psychological Research.
• Scharlau, I. (in press). Perceptual latency priming: A measure of attentional facilitation.Psychological Research.
• Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming.Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363.[PubMed]
• Scharlau, I., Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2006). Latency facilitation in temporal-order judgments: Time course of facilitation as a function of judgment type.Acta Psychologica, 122, 129-159.[PubMed]
• Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003a). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional interpretation.Psychological Research, 67, 184-196.[PubMed]
• Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003b). Temporal parameters and time course of perceptual latency priming.Acta Psychologica, 113, 185-203.[PubMed]
• Schmidt, T. (2007). Measuring unconscious cognition: Beyond the zero-awareness criterion.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 275-287.http://www.ac-psych.org/index.php?id=2&rok=2007&issue=1-2
• Schmidt, T., & Vorberg, D. (2006). Criteria for unconscious cognition: Three types of dissociation.Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 489-504.[PubMed]
• Shelley-Tremblay, J., & Mack, A. (1999). Metacontrast masking and attention.Psychological Science, 10, 508-515.
• Shore, D. I., Spence, C., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Visual prior entry.Psychological Science, 12, 205-212.[PubMed]
• Steglich, C., & Neumann, O. (2000). Temporal, but not spatial, context modulates a masked prime's effect on temporal order judgment, but not on response latency.Psychological Research, 63, 36-47.[PubMed]
• Sternberg, S., & Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum, (Ed.),Attention and performance IV(pp. 625-685). New York, London: Academic Press.
• Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law.Psychological Review, 64, 153-181.[PubMed]
• Tata, M. S. (2002). Attend to it now or lose it forever: Selective attention, metacontrast masking, and object substitution.Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1028-1038.[PubMed]
• Titchener, E. M. (1908).Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: MacMillan.
• Thurstone, L. L. (1948). Psychophysical methods. In T. G. Andrews (Ed.),Methods of psychology(pp. 124-157). New York: Wiley.
• Ulrich, R. (1987). Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task.Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 224-239.
• von Mühlenen, A., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2006, June).A two-factor theory of metacontrast.Poster session at the International Workshop Visual Masking and the Dynamics of Vision and Consciousness, Delmenhorst, Germany.
• Werner, H. (1935). Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analyses.American Journal of Psychology, 47, 40-64.
• Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1961).Experimental psychology(revised ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Wundt, W. (1887).Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie[Main features of physiological psychology]. Leipzig: Engelmann.
• Allik, J., & Kreegpiuu, K. (1998). Multiple visual latency.Psychological Science, 9, 135-138.
• Baars, B. (1995). Tutorial commentary: Surprisingly small subcortical structures are needed for the state of waking consciousness, while cortical perception areas seem to provide perceptual contents of consciousness.Consciousness & Cognition, 4, 159-162.[PubMed]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10053-008-0028-x