Trends and styles in visual masking

• Authors: Ingrid Scharlau , Ulrich Ansorge , Bruno G. Breitmeyer
• Publisher: Wyższa Szkoła Finansów i Zarządzania w Warszawie
• Journal: Advances in Cognitive Psychology
• Year: 2006
• Volume: 2
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 1-5

Contributors

author

Ingrid Scharlau

• Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany

author

Ulrich Ansorge

• Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany

author

Bruno G. Breitmeyer

• Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, USA

References

• Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777.
• Ansorge, U., & Heumann., M. (2006) Shifts of visuospatial attention to invisible (metacontrastmasked) singletons: Clues from reaction times and event-related potential.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 61-16. ACP
• Aron, A. R., Schlaghecken, F., Fletcher, P. C, Bullmore, E. T., Eimer, M., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W (2003). Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is mediated by the caudate and thalamus: Evidence from functional MRI and Huntington's disease.Brain, 126, 713-723.
• Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Breitmeyer, B. G., Ro, T., & Singhal, N. S. (2004). Unconscious color priming occurs at stimulus- not percept-depenent levels of processing.Psychological Science, 15, 198-202.
• Bridgeman, B. (1988). Visual evoked potentials: Concomitants of metacontrast in late components.Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 401-403.
• DiLollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
• Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
• Exner, S. (1868). Über die zu einer Gesichtswahrnehmung nöthige Zeit [On the time necessary for visual perception].Sitzungsberichte der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 2, 601-632.
• Haynes, J. D., Driver, J., & Rees, G. (2005). Visibility reflects dynamic changes of effective connectivity between V1 and fusiform cortex.Neuron, 46, 811-821.
• Herzog, M. H., Lesemann, E., & C. W. Eurich, C. W. (2006) Spatial interactions determine temporal feature integration as revealed by unmasking.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 77-85. ACP
• Jaśkowski, P., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Schlotterbeck, E., & Verleger, R. (2002). Traces left on visual selective attention by stimuli that are not consciously identified.Psychological Science, 13, 48-54.
• Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., & Hoffmann J., (2006). Priming from novel masked stimuli depends on target set size.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 37-45. ACP
• Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
• Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition.Cognition, 88, 223-242.
• Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2001). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing.Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.
• Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials.Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
• Lleras, A., & Enns, J. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475-493.
• Milner, D., & Goodale, M. (1995).The visual brain in action.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Morris, J. S., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala.Nature, 393, 467-470.
• Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to unseen novel stimuli.Cognition, 80, 223-237.
• Neumann, O. (1978).Visuelle Aufmerksamkeit und der Mechanismus des Metakontrasts.[Visual attention and the mechanism of metacontrast.] Report No. 6/1978, Department of Psychology at the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Cognitive Psychology Unit. To appear as: Neumann, O., & Scharlau, I. (in press). Visual attention and metacontrast.Psychological Research.
• Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception.Psychological Research, 52, 207-215.
• Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing(pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Ogmen, H., & Breitmeyer, B. (Eds.). (2006).The first half second: The microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Pinel, P., Rivière, D., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2001). Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task.Neuroimage, 14, 1013-1026.
• Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition(pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Erlbaum.
• Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003a). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming.Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363.
• Scharlau, I., & Horstmann, G. (2006). Perceptual latency priming and illusory line motion: Facilitation by gradients of attention?Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 87-97. ACP
• Schiller, P. H., & Chorover, S. L. (1966). Metacontrast: Its relation to evoked potentials.Science, 153, 1398-1400.
• Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2004). Masked stimuli can bias "free" choices between response alternatives.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 463-468.
• Schlaghecken, F., & Sisman, R. (2006). Low-level motor inhibition in children: Evidence from the negative compatibility effect.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 7-19. ACP
• Skalska, B., Jaśkowski, P., & van der Lubbe, R. H. J., (2006). The role of direct parameter specification and attentional capture of motor reactions.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 41-59. ACP
• Stigler, R. (1910). Chronophotische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast [Chronoptical studies on the "Umgebungskontrast"].Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie, 134, 365-435.
• Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 65-70.
• van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Oostenveld, R., & Schwarzbach J. (2006), Investigat-ing neurophysiological correlates of metacontrast masking with magnetoencephalography.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 21-35. ACP
• Verleger, R., Jaśkowski, P., Aydemir, A., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Groen, M. (2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and non-conscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494-515.
• Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 100, 6275-6280.
• Werner, H. (1935). Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analyses.American Journal of Psychology, 47, 40-64.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10053-008-0040-1