PL EN


2006 | 2 | 1 | 47-59
Article title

The role of direct parameter specification and attentional capture in near-threshold priming of motor reactions

Selected contents from this journal
Title variants
Languages of publication
Abstracts
EN
The priming of motor responses can be induced by preceding visual stimuli that have been made invisible by metacontrast masking (‘primes’). According to the concept of direct parameter specification (DPS; Neumann, 1990), strong similarity between prime and target results in the processing operations that are to be applied to the target being also induced by the prime. As targets have to be attended to, this also implies that attention is captured by the location of a prime, thereby facilitating motor priming effects. This hypothetical effect may be viewed as a form of top-down attentional capture. In some subliminal priming experiments (e.g. Jaśkowski, Skalska, & Verleger, 2003), however, attentional capture may have been unrelated to target identity, as stimuli with unique features (singletons) are known to induce bottom-up attentional capture. Three experiments were performed that largely confirmed the view that the results of these earlier experiments were due to top-down attentional capture, in line with DPS. However, the priming effect was also evoked by a singleton irrelevant to the participants' task, although this effect was weaker than in case of strong similarity between prime and target. Priming effects remained when singletons were absent from one side of the visual field, suggesting that the presence of singletons is not a requirement for the observation of motor priming effects.
Year
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
47-59
Physical description
Contributors
  • Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Finance and Management Warszawa, Poland
  • Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Finance and Management Warszawa, Poland
  • Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
References
  • Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: the roles of color and location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 937-948.
  • Ansorge, U., Heumann, M., & Scharlau, I. (2002). Influences of visibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cueing task.Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 528-545.
  • Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of metacontrast-masked primes: A test of direct parameter specification in a peripheral cueing task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, 31, 762-777.
  • Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
  • Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism.Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
  • Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 741-753.
  • Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
  • Franconeri, S. L., Simons, D. J., & Junge, J. A. (2004). Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention.Psychonomic Bulletin & Reviews, 11, 876-881.
  • Gibson, B. S., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search.Psychological Science, 9, 176-182.
  • Jaśkowski, P., Skalska, B., & Verleger, R. (2003). How the self controls its "automatic pilot" when processing subliminal information.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911-920.
  • Jaśkowski, P., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Schlotterbeck, E., & Verleger, R. (2002). Traces left on visual selective attention by stimuli that are not consciously identified.Psychological Science, 13, 48-54.
  • Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
  • Klotz, W., & Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus.Psychological Research, 58, 92-101.
  • Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198-205.
  • Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials.Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
  • Lingnau, A., & Vorberg, D. (2005). The time-course of response inhibition in masked priming.Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 545-557.
  • Mattler, U. (2003). Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 167-187.
  • McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168-180.
  • Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 567-571.
  • Miśkiewicz, A., Skalska, B., & Jaśkowski, P. (2002). Paradygmat wielokrotnego prymowania podprogowego dla bodźców prezentowanych centralnie i peryferyjnie [Multiple priming by means of centrally and peripherally presented subliminal stimuli]. Poster presented at conference.Automatisms - New Perspectives, 3rd Jadwisin Colloquium, 20-22 June 2002.
  • Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception.Psychological Research, 52, 207-215.
  • Neumann, O., Ansorge, U., & Klotz, W. (1998). Funktionsdifferenzierung im visuellen Kortex: Grundlage für motorische Aktivierung durch nicht bewußt wahrgenommene Reize? [Functional differentiation in the visual cortex: Basis for motor activation by not consciously perceived stimuli].Psychologische Rundschau, 49, 185-196.
  • Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltá & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Conscious and unconscious information processing(pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting of attention.Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863-1874.
  • Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming.Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363.
  • Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control.Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148-162.
  • Schubö, A., Schlaghecken, F., & Meinecke, C. (2001). Learning to ignore the mask in texture segmentation tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 919-931.
  • Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
  • Skalska, B., Gierszewska, P., Miłkowska, M., Okulicz, J., & Jaśkowski, P. (2004). Neutral primes can modify subliminal priming effect. Poster presented on European Conference on Visual Perception, 22-26 August 2004.
  • Sobieralska, K., & Jaśkowski, P. (2005). How perceptual learning influence the subliminal priming effect? Poster presented on European Conference on Visual Perception, 22-26 August 2005.
  • Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
  • Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
  • Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65-70.
  • van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Postma, A. (2005). Interruption from irrelevant auditory and visual onsets even when attention is in a focused state.Experimental Brain Research, 164, 464-471.
  • Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2004). Invariant time course of priming with and without awareness. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.),Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition(pp. 271-288). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-article-doi-10-2478-v10053-008-0044-x
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.