Specifying attentional top-down influences on subsequent unconscious semantic processing

• Authors: Ulla Martens , Markus Kiefer

Abstracts

EN

Classical theories assume that unconscious automatic processes are autonomous and independent of higher-level cognitive influences. In contrast, we propose that automatic processing depends on a specific configuration of the cognitive system by top-down control. In 2 experiments, we tested the influence of available attentional resources and previously activated task sets on masked semantic priming in a lexical decision task. In Experiment 1, before masked prime presentation, participants were engaged in an easy or hard primary task that differentially afforded attentional resources. Semantic priming was attenuated when the primary task was hard, that is, when only little attentional resources were available. In Experiment 2, a semantic or perceptual induction task differentially modulated subsequent masked semantic priming. Hence, unconscious automatic processing depends on the availability of attentional resources and is susceptible to top-down control.

Keywords

EN

automatic processes; unconscious cognition; attentional control; semantic priming; subliminal perception

• Publisher: Wyższa Szkoła Finansów i Zarządzania w Warszawie
• Journal: Advances in Cognitive Psychology
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 5
• Pages: 56-68

Contributors

author

Ulla Martens

author

Markus Kiefer

• Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulm, Germany

References

• Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. Attention and Performance series(pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Ansorge, U., Heumann, M., & Scharlau, I. (2002). Influences of visibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cuing task.Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 528-545.
• Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2007). Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 952-975.
• Ansorge, U., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (in press). Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colours: Evidence from event-related potentials.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
• Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777.
• Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.),Unintended thought(pp. 3-51). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: A functional double dissociation.Neuropsychologia, 43, 89-98.
• Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition.
• Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 341-350.
• Chiappe, P. R., Smith, M. C., & Besner, D. (1996). Semantic priming in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domains of processing.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 249-253.
• Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop Effect.Psychological Review, 97, 333-361.
• Cohen, J. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex, and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia.Psychological Review, 99, 45-77.
• Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework.Cognition, 79, 1-37.
• Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., LeClec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming.Nature, 395, 597-600.
• Eckstein, D., & Perrig, W. J. (2007). The influence of intention on masked priming: A study with semantic classification of words.Cognition, 104, 345-376.
• Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model.Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
• Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics.New York: Wiley.
• Hamker, F. H. (2005). The reentry hypothesis: The putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, ITfor attention and eye movement.Cerebral Cortex, 15, 431-447.
• Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance 18:Control of cognitive processes. Attention and performance series(pp. 247-273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
• Jaśkowski, P., Skalska, B., & Verleger, R. (2003). How the self controls its "automatic pilot" when processing subliminal information.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911-920.
• Kiefer, M. (2002). The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: Further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects.Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 27-39.
• Kiefer, M. (2007). Top-down modulation of unconscious ‘automatic’ processes: A gating framework.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 289-306.
• Kiefer, M., & Brendel, D. (2006). Attentional modulation of unconscious ‘automatic’ processes: Evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 184-198.
• Kiefer, M., & Martens, U. (submitted). Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: Task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Kiefer, M., & Spitzer, M. (2000). Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain activation.NeuroReport, 11, 2401-2407.
• Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
• Koivisto, M. (1998). Categorical priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Automatic in the left hemisphere, postlexical in the right hemisphere?Neuropsychologia, 36, 661-668.
• Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition.Cognition, 88, 223-242.
• Logan, G. D. (1989). Automaticity and cognitive control. In U. J. S. & J. A. Bargh (Eds.),Unintended thought(pp. 52-74). New York: Guilford Press.
• Mari-Beffa, P., Valdes, B., Cullen, D. J., Catena, A., & Houghton, G. (2005). ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words.Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 293-305.
• Mattler, U. (2003). Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 167-187.
• Maxfield, L. (1997). Attention and semantic priming: A review of prime task effects.Consciousness & Cognition, 6, 204-218.
• Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
• Merikle, P. M., Joordens, S., & Stolz, J. A. (1995). Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences.Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 422-439.
• Müller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1021-1035.
• Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention.Psychological Science, 13, 416-424.
• Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic progresses in reading. Visual word recognition(pp. 264-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Cognition and motor processes(pp. 245-293). Berlin: Springer.
• Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltá & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing(pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
• Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory.Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
• Pashler, H., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance.Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629-651.
• Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium(pp. 55-85). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
• Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., & Henninghausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect.Psychophysiology, 38, 165-174.
• Ruoff, A. (1990).Häufigkeitswörterbuch gesprochener Sprache[Frequency dictionary of spoken language] (2nd ed.). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
• Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming.Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363.
• Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
• Valdes, B., Catena, A., & Mari-Beffa, P. (2005). Automatic and controlled semantic processing: A masked prime-task effect.Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 278-295.
• Verleger, R., Jaśkowski, P., Aydemir, A., van der Lubbe, R. H., & Groen, M. (2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494-515.
• Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 6275-6280.
• Wolbers, T., Schoell, E. D., Verleger, R., Kraft, S., McNamara, A., Jaśkowski, P., et al. (2006). Changes in connectivity profiles as a mechanism for strategic control over interfering subliminal information.Cerebral Cortex, 16, 857-864.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10053-008-0067-3