Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2011 | 7 | 16-30

Article title

Neural representations of the sense of self

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The brain constructs representations of what is sensed and thought about in the form of nerve impulses that propagate in circuits and network assemblies (Circuit Impulse Patterns, CIPs). CIP representations of which humans are consciously aware occur in the context of a sense of self. Thus, research on mechanisms of consciousness might benefit from a focus on how a conscious sense of self is represented in brain. Like all senses, the sense of self must be contained in patterns of nerve impulses. Unlike the traditional senses that are registered by impulse flow in relatively simple, pauci-synaptic projection pathways, the sense of self is a system-level phenomenon that may be generated by impulse patterns in widely distributed complex and interacting circuits. The problem for researchers then is to identify the CIPs that are unique to conscious experience. Also likely to be of great relevance to constructing the representation of self are the coherence shifts in activity timing relations among the circuits. Consider that an embodied sense of self is generated and contained as unique combinatorial temporal patterns across multiple neurons in each circuit that contributes to constructing the sense of self. As with other kinds of CIPs, those representing the sense of self can be learned from experience, stored in memory, modified by subsequent experiences, and expressed in the form of decisions, choices, and commands. These CIPs are proposed here to be the actual physical basis for conscious thought and the sense of self. When active in wakefulness or dream states, the CIP representations of self act as an agent of the brain, metaphorically as an avatar. Because the selfhood CIP patterns may only have to represent the self and not directly represent the inner and outer worlds of embodied brain, the self representation should have more degrees of freedom than subconscious mind and may therefore have some capacity for a free-will mind of its own. Several lines of evidence for this theory are reviewed. Suggested new research includes identifying distinct combinatorially coded impulse patterns and their temporal coherence shifts in defined circuitry, such as neocortical microcolumns. This task might be facilitated by identifying the micro-topography of field-potential oscillatory coherences among various regions and between different frequencies associated with specific conscious mentation. Other approaches can include identifying the changes in discrete conscious operations produced by focal trans-cranial magnetic stimulation.

Year

Volume

7

Pages

16-30

Physical description

Contributors

  • College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Texas

References

  • Binzegger, T., Douglas, R. J., & Martin, A. C. (2005). Cortical architecture. In M. De Gregorio, V. Di Mayo, M. Frucci, & C. Mucio (Eds.),BVAI 2005: LNCS(Vol. 3704, pp. 15-28). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Burkhalter, A. (2008). Many specialists for suppressing cortical excitation.Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2, 155-167.
  • Buzsáki, G. (2006).Rhythms of the brain.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Capotosto, P., Babiloni, C., Romani, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2009). Frontoparietal cortex controls spatial attention through modulation of anticipatory alpha rhythms.Journal of Neuroscience, 29(18), 5863-5872.
  • da Costa, N. M., & Martin, K. A. (2010). Whose cortical column would that be?Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 4(16), 1-10. doi: 10. 3389/fnana.2010.00016
  • Douglas, R. J., & Martin, K. A. (2004). Neuronal circuits of the neocortex.Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 419-451.
  • Doya, K., Ishii, S., Pouget, A., & Rao, R. P. N. (Eds.). (2007).Bayesian brain: Probabilistic approaches to neural coding.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000).A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination.New York: Basic Books.
  • Fingelkurts, Andrew A., Fingelkurts, Alexander A., & Neves, C. F. H. (2010a). Natural world physical, brain operational, and mind phenomenal space-time.Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 195-249.
  • Fingelkurts, Andrew A., Fingelkurts, Alexander A., & Neves, C. F. H. (2010b). Emergentist monism, biological realism, operations and brain-mind problem.Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 264-268.
  • Freeman, W. J. (2007). Indirect biological measures of consciousness from field studies of brains as dynamical systems.Neural Networks, 20, 1021-1031.
  • Freeman, W. J. (2009). Consciousness, intentionality, and causality. In S. Pockett, W. P. Banks, & S. Gallagher (Eds.),Does consciousness cause behavior?(pp. 73-105). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fries, P., Reynolds, J. H., Rorie, A. E., & Desimone, R. (2001). Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.Science, 291, 1560-1563.
  • Grafman, J., & Wassermann, E. (1998). Transcranial magnetic stimulation can measure and modulate learning and memory.Neuropsychologia, 37(2), 159-167.
  • Hecht, D., Walsh, V., & Lavidor, M. (2010). Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates decision making in a probabilistic guessing task.Journal of Neuroscience, 30(12), 4241-4245.
  • Herculano-Houzel, S. (2009). The human brain in numbers: A linearly scaled-up primate brain.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3(31), 1-11. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.031.2009
  • Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex.Journal of Physiology, 148, 574-591.
  • Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.Journal of Physiology, 160, 106-154.
  • Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation.Science, 286(5449), 2526-2528. doi:10.1126/science. 286.5449.2526
  • Izhikevich, E. M. (2007).Dynamical systems in neuroscience. The geometry of excitability and bursting.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Izhikevich, E. M., Desai, N. S., Walcott, E. C., & Hoppensteadt, F. C. (2003). Bursts as a unit of neural information. Selective communication via resonance.Trends in Neuroscience, 26, 161-167.
  • Jefferys, J. G., & Whittington, M. A. (1996). Review of the role of inhibitory neurons in chronic epileptic foci induced by intracerebral tetanus toxin.Epilepsy Research, 26(1), 59-66.]
  • Johnson, J. S., Hamidi, M. X., & Postle, B. R. (2009, October).It's not a "Virtual lesion." Evaluating the effects of rTMS on neural activity and behavior.Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Chicago, IL.
  • Jones, E. G. (1998). Viewpoint: The core and matrix of thalamic organization.Neuroscience, 85(2), 331-345. doi:10.1016/S03 06-4522(97)00581-2
  • Jones, E. G. (2000). Microcolumns in the cerebral cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 97(10), 5019-5021. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.10.5019
  • Klemm, W. R. (1973). Typical electroencephalograms: Vertebrates. In P. L. Altman & D. S. Dittmer (Eds.),Biology data book(Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 1254-1260). Bethesda, MD: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
  • Klemm, W. R. (1992). Are there EEGcorrelates of animal thinking & feeling.Neuropsychobiology, 26, 151-165.
  • Klemm, W. R. (2010). Free will: Simple experiments are not so simple.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 6, 47-65.
  • Klemm, W. R., Li, T. H., & Hernandez, J. L. (2000). Coherent EEGindicators of cognitive binding during ambiguous figure tasks.Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 66-85.
  • Klemm, W. R., & Sherry, C. J. (1982). Do neurons process information by relative intervals in spike trains?Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, 6, 429-437.
  • Klemm, W. R., & Vertes, R. (1990).Brainstem mechanisms of behavior.New York: Wiley & Sons.
  • Kobayashi, A., Yamagiwa, H., Hoshino, H., Muto, A., Sato, K., Morita, M., et al. (2000). A combinatorial code for gene expression generated by transcription factor Bach2 and MAZR(MAZ-related factors) through the BTB/POZ domain.Molecular Cellular Biology, 20(5),1733-1746.
  • Koch, C. (2004).The quest for consciousness.Englewood, CO: Roberts and Company.
  • Kuhl, P., & Rivera-Gaxiola, M. (2008). Neural substrates of language acquisition.Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 511-534.
  • LeDoux, J. (2002).Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are.New York: Viking.
  • MacDonald, K. D., Fifkova, E., Jones, M. S., & Barth, D. S. (1998). Focal stimulation of the thalamic reticular nucleus induces focal gamma waves in cortex.Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 474-477.
  • Masquelier, T., Hugues, E., Gustavo, D., & Thorpe, J. S. (2009). Oscillations, phase-of-firing coding, and spike timing-dependent plasticity: An efficient learning scheme.Journal of Neuroscience, 29(43), 13484-13493.
  • Murthy, V. N., & Fetz, E. (1996). Synchronization of neurons during local field potential oscillations in sensorimotor cortex of awake monkeys.Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 3968-3982.
  • Nunez, P. (2010).Brain, mind, and the structure of reality.New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Osborne, L. C., Palmer, S. E., Lisberger, S. G., & Bialek, W. (2008). The neural basis for combinatorial coding in a cortical population response.Journal of Neuroscience, 28(50), 13522-13531.
  • Pesaran, B., Pezaris, J. S., Sahani, M., Mitra, P. P., & Andersen, R. A. (2002). Temporal structure in neuronal activity during working memory in macaque parietal cortex.Nature Neuroscience, 5, 805-811.
  • Reich, D. S., Mechler, F., & Victor, J. D. (2001). Independent and redundant information in nearby cortical neurons.Science, 294, 2566-2568.
  • Rutishauser, U., Ross, I. B., Mamelak, A. N., & Schuman, E. M. (2010). Human memory strength is predicted by theta-frequency phase locking of single neuron.Nature, 464, 903-907.
  • Schiff, N. D. (2008). Central thalamic contributions to arousal regulation and neurological disorders of consciousness.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1129, 105-118.
  • Schulz, R., Lüders, H. O., Noachtar, S., May, T., Sakamoto, A., Holthausen, H., & Wolf, P. (1995). Amnesia of the epileptic aura.Neurology, 45(2), 231-235.
  • Shadlen, M. N., & Movshon, J. A. (1999). Synchrony unbound: A critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis.Neuron, 24, 67-77.
  • Singer, W. (2001). Consciousness and the binding problem.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 929, 123-146.
  • Stapp, H. (2007).Mindful universe: Quantum mechanics and the participating observer.New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Steriade, M. (2006). Grouping of brain rhythms in corticothalamic systems.Neuroscience, 137, 1087-1106.
  • Steriade, M., & McCarley, R. W. (2005).Brain control of wakefulness and sleep(2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
  • Steriade, M., & Glenn, L. L. (1982). Neocortical and caudate projections of intralaminar thalamic neurons and their synaptic excitation from midbrain reticular core.Journal of Neurophysiology, 48, 352-371.
  • Tolman, E. C. (1932).Purposive behavior in animals and men.New York: Century.
  • Walsh, V., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2003).Transcranial magnetic stimulation.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Yingling, C. D., & Skinner, J. E. (1977). Gating of thalamic input to cerebral cortex by nucleus reticularis thalami. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.),Attention, voluntary contraction, and event-related cerebral potentials(Vol. 1, pp. 70-96). Basel, New York: Karger.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-article-doi-10-2478-v10053-008-0084-2
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.