The effects of spatial and temporal cueing on metacontrast masking

• Authors: Maximilian Bruchmann , Philipp Hintze , Simon Mota

Abstracts

EN

We studied the effects of selective attention on metacontrast masking with 3 different cueing experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 compared central symbolic and peripheral spatial cues. For symbolic cues, we observed small attentional costs, that is, reduced visibility when the target appeared at an unexpected location, and attentional costs as well as benefits for peripheral cues. All these effects occurred exclusively at the late, ascending branch of theU-shaped metacontrast masking function, although the possibility exists that cueing effects at the early branch were obscured by a ceiling effect due to almost perfect visibility at short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). In Experiment 3, we presented temporal cues that indicated when the target was likely to appear, not where. Here, we also observed cueing effects in the form of higher visibility when the target appeared at the expected point in time compared to when it appeared too early. However, these effects were not restricted to the late branch of the masking function, but enhanced visibility over the complete range of the masking function. Given these results we discuss a common effect for different types of spatial selective attention on metacontrast masking involving neural subsystems that are different from those involved in temporal attention.

Keywords

EN

visual masking; metacontrast; spatial cueing; temporal cueing

• Publisher: Wyższa Szkoła Finansów i Zarządzania w Warszawie
• Journal: Advances in Cognitive Psychology
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 7
• Pages: 132-141

Contributors

author

Maximilian Bruchmann

• Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Germany

author

Philipp Hintze

• Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Germany

author

Simon Mota

• Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Germany

References

• Albrecht, T., Klapötke, S., & Mattler, U. (2010). Individual differences in metacontrast masking are enhanced by perceptual learning.Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 656-666.
• Boyer, J., & Ro, T. (2007). Attention attenuates metacontrast masking.Cognition, 104(1), 135-149.
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436.
• Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.Psychological Review, 83(1), 1-36.
• Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ögmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update.Perception & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1572-1595.
• Breitmeyer, B. G., & Öğmen, H. (2006).Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision.New York: Oxford University Press.
• Bruchmann, M., Breitmeyer, B. G., & Pantev, C. (2010). Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts.Journal of Vision, 10(6), 1-14.
• Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years.Vision Research, 51(13), 1484-1525.
• Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing.Acta Psychologica, 73(3), 195-209.
• Cheal, M., Lyon, D. R., & Hubbard, D. C. (1991). Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(4), 825-857.
• Correa, Á., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials.Brain Research, 1076(1), 116-128.
• Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., Büchel, C., & Nobre, A. C. (2000). Orienting attention in time: Behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts.Neuropsychologia, 38(6), 808-819.
• Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI.The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 18(18), 7426-7435.
• Dorfman, D. D., & Berbaum, K. S. (1986). RSCORE-J: Pooled rating-method data: A computer program for analyzing pooled ROC curves.Behavior Research Methods, 18(5), 452-462.
• Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 345-352.
• Eriksen, C. W., & St James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics, 40(4), 225-240.
• Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 583-597.
• Galera, C., & Grünau, M. W. (2003). Size and shape of the attentional spotlight affect efficiency of processing.Journal of Vision, 3(9), 575.
• Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics.New York: Wiley.
• Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence.The American Psychologist, 39(12), 1372-1388.
• Haynes, J.-D., Driver, J., & Rees, G. (2005). Visibility reflects dynamic changes of effective connectivity between V1 and fusiform cortex.Neuron, 46(5), 811-821.
• Hein, E., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2006). Visual attention and temporal discrimination: Differential effects of automatic and voluntary cueing.Visual Cognition, 13(1), 29-50.
• Heinze, H. J., Mangun, G. R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Münte, T. F., et al. (1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans.Nature, 372(6506), 543-546.
• Hopfinger, J., Buonocore, M., & Mangun, G. (2000). The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.Nature Neuroscience, 3, 284-291.
• Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Weiskrantz, L. (1999). Effects of temporal cueing on residual visual discrimination in blind-sight.Neuropsychologia, 37(4), 479-483.
• Kentridge, R. W., Nijboer, T. C. W., & Heywood, C. A. (2008). Attended but unseen: Visual attention is not sufficient for visual awareness.Neuropsychologia, 46(3), 864-869.
• Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 12-18.
• Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions.Vision Research, 46(8-9), 1210-1220.
• Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
• Macknik, S. L., & Livingstone, M. S. (1998). Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system.Nature Neuroscience, 1(2), 144-149.
• Macknik, S. L., & Martinez-Conde, S. (2007). The role of feedback in visual masking and visual processing.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 125-152.
• Michaels, C. F., & Turvey, M. T. (1979). Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance.Psychological Research, 41(1), 2-61.
• Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315-330.
• Neumann, O., & Scharlau, I. (2007). Visual attention and the mechanism of metacontrast.Psychological Research, 71(6), 626-633.
• Nobre, A. C. (2001). Orienting attention to instants in time.Neuropsychologia, 39(12), 1317-1328.
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3.
• Reeves, A. (1982). Metacontrast U-shaped functions derive from two monotonic processes.Perception, 11(4), 415-426.
• Smith, P. L. (2000). Attention and luminance detection: Effects of cues, masks, and pedestals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(4), 1401-1420.
• Smith, P. L., Lee, Y.-E., Wolfgang, B. J., & Ratcliff, R. (2009). Attention and the detection of masked radial frequency patterns: Data and model.Vision Research, 49(10), 1363-1377.
• Smith, P. L., & Wolfgang, B. J. (2004). The attentional dynamics of masked detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance, 30(1), 119-136.
• Tata, M. S. (2002). Attend to it now or lose it forever: Selective attention, metacontrast masking, and object substitution.Perception & Psychophysics, 64(7), 1028-1038.
• Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.Psychological Review, 80(1), 1-52.
• Wickens, T. D. (2001).Elementary signal detection theory.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10053-008-0093-1