Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2011 | 7 | 142-156

Article title

Cognitive and affective judgements of syncopated musical themes

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
This study investigated cognitive and emotional effects of syncopation, a feature of musical rhythm that produces expectancy violations in the listener by emphasising weak temporal locations and de-emphasising strong locations in metric structure. Stimuli consisting of pairs of unsyncopated and syncopated musical phrases were rated by 35 musicians for perceived complexity, enjoyment, happiness, arousal, and tension. Overall, syncopated patterns were more enjoyed, and rated as happier, than unsyncopated patterns, while differences in perceived tension were unreliable. Complexity and arousal ratings were asymmetric by serial order, increasing when patterns moved from unsyncopated to syncopated, but not significantly changing when order was reversed. These results suggest that syncopation influences emotional valence (positively), and that while syncopated rhythms are objectively more complex than unsyncopated rhythms, this difference is more salient when complexity increases than when it decreases. It is proposed that composers and improvisers may exploit this asymmetry in perceived complexity by favoring formal structures that progress from rhythmically simple to complex, as can be observed in the initial sections of musical forms such as theme and variations.

Year

Volume

7

Pages

142-156

Physical description

Contributors

  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
  • School of English, Media and Performing Arts, University of New South Wales, Australia

References

  • Arom, S., Thom, M., Tuckett, B., & Boyd, R. (1991).African polyphony and polyrhythm: Musical structure and methodology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beauvois, M. W. (2007). Quantifying aesthetic preference and perceived complexity for fractal melodies.Music Perception, 24(3), 247-264.
  • Becker, J. (2009). Crossing boundaries: An introductory essay.Empirical Musicology Review, 4(2), 45-48.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1971).Aesthetics and psychobiology.East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Bharucha, J. J., & Pryor, J. H. (1986). Disrupting the isochrony underlying rhythm: An asymmetry in discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 40(3), 137-141.
  • Bigand, E., Vieillard, S., Madurell, F., Marozeau, J., & Dacquet, A. (2005). Multidimensional scaling of emotional responses to music: The effect of musical expertise and of the duration of the excerpts.Cognition & Emotion, 19(8), 1113-1139.
  • Brown, J. C. (1993). Determination of the meter of musical scores by autocorrelation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1953-1953.
  • Chen, J. L., Penhune, V. B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain.Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2844-2854.
  • Chernoff, J. M. (1979).African rhythm and African sensibility. Aesthetics and social action in African musical idioms.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Clayton, M. (2009). The social and personal functions of music in cross-cultural perspective. In S. Hallam, I. Cross, & M. Thaut (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of music psychology(pp. 35-44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Clayton, M., Sager, R., & Will, U. (2005). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and its significance for ethnomusicology.European Meetings in Ethnomusicology, 11, 3-75.
  • Damasio, A. R. (2000).The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness.New York: Harcourt Brace.
  • Dean, R. T., Bailes, F., & Schubert, E. (2011). Acoustic intensity causes perceived changes in arousal levels in music: An experimental investigation.PLoS One, 6(4), e18591.
  • Dixon, S. (2001). Automatic extraction of tempo and beat from expressive performances.Journal of New Music Research, 30(1), 39-58.
  • Eerola, T., & Toiviainen, P. (2004).MIDI toolbox: MATLAB tools for music research.University of Jyväskylä: Kopijyvä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Eisenberg, J., & Thompson, W. F. (2003). A matter of taste: Evaluating improvised music.Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 287-296.
  • Engel, A., & Keller, P. E. (2011). The perception of musical spontaneity in improvised and imitated jazz performances.Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 83.
  • Evans, P., & Schubert, E. (2008). Relationships between expressed and felt emotions in music.Musicae Scientiae, 12(1), 75-99.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1968). An experimental study of aesthetic preference for polygonal figures.The Journal of General Psychology, 79, 3-17.
  • Fechner, G. T. (1897).Vorschule der Aesthetik [Experimental Aesthetics; "Pre-school" of aesthetics].Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
  • Fitch, W. T., & Rosenfeld, A. J. (2007). Perception and production of syncopated rhythms.Music Perception, 25(1), 43-58.
  • Fritz, T., Jentschke, S., Gosselin, N., Sammler, D., Peretz, I., Turner, R., et al. (2009). Universal recognition of three basic emotions in music.Current Biology, 19(7), 573-576.
  • Gabrielsson, A. (1973). Adjective ratings and dimension analyses of auditory rhythm patterns.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 14(4), 244-260.
  • Gabrielsson, A. (2010). Strong experiences with music. In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.),Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications(pp. 547-574). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Gabrielsson, A., & Juslin, P. N. (2003). Emotional expression in music. In R. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.),The handbook of affective sciences(pp. 503-534). New York: Oxford University Press
  • Gabrielsson, A., & Lindström, E. (2010). The role of structure in the musical expression of emotions. In P. N. Juslin & J. Sloboda (Eds.),Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications(pp. 367-399). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Garrido, S., & Schubert, E. (2011). Individual differences in the enjoyment of negative emotion in music: A literature review and experiment.Music Perception, 28(3), 279-295.
  • Gómez, F., Melvin, A., Rappaport, D., & Toussaint, G. T. (2005). Mathematical measures of syncopation. In R. Sarhangi & R. V. Moody (Eds.),Proceedings of BRIDGES: Mathematical connections in art, music, and science(pp. 73-84). Banff, Alberta, Canada.
  • Gundlach, R. H. (1935). Factors determining the characterisation of musical phrases.American Journal of Psychology, 47, 624-643.
  • Handel, S. (1998). The interplay between metric and figural rhythmic organization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24(5), 1546-1561.
  • Hannon, E. E., & Trehub, S. E. (2005). Tuning in to musical rhythms: Infants learn more readily than adults.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(35), 12639-12643.
  • Hevner, K. (1936). Experimental studies of the elements of expression in music.American Journal of Psychology, 48, 246-268.
  • Huron, D. (1990). Crescendo/diminuendo asymmetries in Beethoven piano sonatas.Music Perception, 7(4), 395-402.
  • Huron, D. (1992). The ramp archetype and the maintenance of passive auditory attention.Music Perception, 10(1), 83-91.
  • Huron, D. (2006).Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Huron, D., & Ommen, A. (2006). An empirical study of syncopation in american popular music, 1890-1939.Music Theory Spectrum, 28(2), 211-231.
  • Ilie, G., & Thompson, W. F. (2006). A comparison of acoustic cues in music and speech for three dimensions of affect.Music Perception, 23(4), 319-329.
  • Jackendoff, R. S., & Lerdahl, F. (1983).A generative theory of tonal music.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1991). Rhythm and meter: A theory at the computational level.Psychomusicology, 10(2), 88-106.
  • Jones, M. R. (1990). Learning and the development of expectancies: An interactionist approach.Psychomusicology, 9(2), 193-228.
  • Juslin, P. N. (2005). From mimesis to catharsis: Expression, perception, and induction of emotion in music. In D. Miell, R. MacDonald, & D. J. Hargreaves (Eds.),Musical communication(pp. 85-115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2004). Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: A review and a questionnaire study of everyday listening.Journal of New Music Research, 33(3), 217-238.
  • Kornysheva, K., von Cramon, D. Y., Jacobsen, T., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Tuning-in to the beat: Aesthetic appreciation of musical rhythms correlates with a premotor activity boost.Human Brain Mapping, 31, 48-64.
  • Lerdahl, F. (1996). Calculating tonal tension.Music Perception, 13(3), 319-363.
  • Lerdahl, F., & Krumhansl, C. L. (2007). Modeling tonal tension.Music Perception, 24(4), 329-366.
  • London, J. (2004).Hearing in time: Psychological aspects of musical meter.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • London, J. (2007). Rhythm. I. Fundamental concepts and terminology.Oxford Music Online.Retrieved 25 January, 2011, fromhttp://www.oxfordmusiconline.com
  • Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Lee, C. S. (1982). The perception of musical rhythms.Perception, 11(2), 115-128.
  • Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Lee, C. S. (1984). The rhythmic interpretation of monophonic music.Music Perception, 1(4), 424-441.
  • Meyer, L. B. (1956).Emotion and meaning in music.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Nettl, B. (2005).The study of ethnomusicology: Thirty-one issues and concepts.Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Neuhoff, J. G. (2001). An adaptive bias in the perception of looming auditory motion.Ecological Psychology, 13(2), 87-110.
  • North, A. C., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1997). Experimental aesthetics and everyday music listening. In D. J. Hargreaves & A. C. North (Eds.),The social psychology of music(pp. 84-103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • North, A. C., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1998). Complexity, prototypicality, familiarity, and the perception of musical quality.Psychomusicology, 17(1-2), 77-80.
  • Orr, M. G., & Ohlsson, S. (2001). The relationship between musical complexity and liking in jazz and bluegrass.Psychology of Music, 29(2), 108-127.
  • Orr, M. G., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Relationship between complexity and liking as a function of expertise.Music Perception, 22(4), 583-611.
  • Parncutt, R. (1994). A perceptual model of pulse salience and metrical accent in musical rhythms.Music Perception, 11(4), 409-464.
  • Pressing, J. (1999). Cognitive complexity and the structure of musical patterns.Noetica, 3(8), 1-8.
  • Ritossa, D. A., & Rickard, N. S. (2004). The relative utility of "plea-santness and liking" dimensions in predicting the emotions expressed by music.Psychology of Music, 32(1), 5-22.
  • Rosenblum, L. D., Wuestefeld, A. P., & Saldana, H. M. (1993). Auditory looming perception: Influences on anticipatory judgments.Perception, 22(12), 1467-1482.
  • Russell, J. A. (1979). Affective space is bipolar.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 345-356.
  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect.Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
  • Salimpoor, V., Benovoy, M., Longo, G., Cooperstock, J., & Zatorre, R. (2009). The rewarding aspects of music listening are related to degree of emotional arousal.PloS One, 4(10), 29-49.
  • Schellenberg, E. G. (2001). Asymmetries in the discrimination of musical intervals: Going out-of-tune is more noticeable than going in-tune.Music Perception, 19(2), 223-248.
  • Schellenberg, E. G., Nakata, T., Hunter, P. G., & Tamoto, S. (2007). Exposure to music and cognitive performance: Tests of children and adults.Psychology of Music, 35(1), 5-19.
  • Schellenberg, E. G., & Trainor, L. J. (1996). Sensory consonance and the perceptual similarity of complex-tone harmonic intervals: Tests of adult and infant listeners.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(5), 3321-3328.
  • Schellenberg, E. G., & Trehub, S. E. (1996). Children's discrimination of melodic intervals.Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 1039-1050.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2004). Which emotions can be induced by music? What are the underlying mechanisms? And how can we measure them?Journal of New Music Research, 33(3), 239-251.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured?Social Science Information, 44(4), 695-729.
  • Schimmack, U., & Rainer, R. (2002). Experiencing activation: Energetic arousal and tense arousal are not mixtures of valence and activation.Emotion, 2(4), 412-417.
  • Schubert, E. (1996). Enjoyment of negative emotions in music: An associative network explanation.Psychology of Music, 24(1), 18-28.
  • Schubert, E. (2004). Modeling perceived emotion with continuous musical features.Music Perception, 21, 561-585.
  • Schubert, E. (2007a). The influence of emotion, locus of emotion, and familiarity upon preference in music.Psychology of Music, 35(3), 499-515.
  • Schubert, E. (2007b). Locus of emotion: The effect of task order and age on emotion perceived and emotion felt in response to music.Journal of Music Therapy, 44(4), 344-368.
  • Schubert, E. (2010). Affective, evaluative, and collative responses to hated and loved music.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(1), 36-46.
  • Shmulevich, I., & Povel, D. J. (2000). Measures of temporal pattern complexity.Journal of New Music Research, 29(1), 61-69.
  • Steinbeis, N., Koelsch, S., & Sloboda, J. A. (2006). The role of harmonic expectancy violations in musical emotions: Evidence from subjective, physiological, and neural responses.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(8), 1380-1393.
  • Stevens, C., & Byron, T. (2009). Universals in music processing. In S. Hallam, I. Cross, & M. Thaut (Eds.),Oxford handbook of music psychology(pp. 14-23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Temperley, D. (2008). Syncopation in rock: A perceptual perspective.Popular Music, 18(1), 19-40.
  • Thomassen, J. M. (1982). Melodic accent: Experiments and a tentative model.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(6), 1596-1605.
  • Timmers, R., & Ashley, R. (2007). Emotional ornamentation in performances of a Handel sonata.Music Perception, 25(2), 117-134.
  • Toiviainen, P., & Eerola, T. (2006). Autocorrelation in meter induction: The role of accent structure.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(2), 1164-1170.
  • Wundt, W. (1905).Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie [Principles of physiological psychology].Leipzig: Engelmann.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-article-doi-10-2478-v10053-008-0094-0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.