PL EN


2011 | 3 | 73-84
Article title

Changing Paradigms in Network Neutrality and its Effects on Public Sector Broadcasting Online Services: Germany's Case

Title variants
Languages of publication
Abstracts
EN
Network neutrality has accelerated the wide spreading and adaptation of the Internet as a mass medium giving rise to the diversity which characterizes the Internet today. The expansion of existing networks in the course of development of next-generation broadband technologies has initiated a discussion beginning in 2005 and originating in the U.S., which challenges network neutrality as a universal interconnectivity paradigm for IP-based networks. This, in turn, challenges the existing provision strategies of data-intensive multimedia services thus raising interrelated and pertinent regulatory questions. This article focuses on four areas of interest: the interplay of telecommunications and media regulation, commodification and public value orientation, freedom of access and power of disposal over proprietary services and network neutrality and potential for diversification in the telecommunications sector. It provides an economic analysis of changing paradigms in network neutrality and illustrates how these developments might affect regulatory issues for the provision of online content in the public sector broadcasting with a particular focus on Germany's market.
Publisher
Year
Volume
3
Pages
73-84
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Department of Economics, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, Matthias-Corvinus-Str. 15 A-3100 St. Pölten
  • Department of Economics, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, Matthias-Corvinus-Str. 15 A-3100 St. Pölten
References
  • Becker, A. (2008). Die diskussion um die netzneutralität [Discussion on net neutrality].MedienWirtschaft, 5(2), 30-32. (In German)
  • Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive).Official Journal, L 108, 24/04/2002, p.0007 - 0020.
  • Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive).Official Journal, L 108, 24/04/2002, p. 0021 - 0032.
  • Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive).Official Journal, L 108, 24/04/2002, p. 0033 - 0050.
  • Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive),Official Journal, L 108, 24/04/2002, p. 0051 - 0077.
  • Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications),Official Journal, L 201, 31/07/2002, p. 0037 - 0047.
  • Dörr, R.; Wiesner, J. (2009). Zwischen wirtschaft und kultur: 20 Jahre EU-fernsehrichtlinie. Grundlinien europäischer medienpolitik [Between business and culture: 20 years of European television directive. Foundations of European media policy].Media Perspektiven, 10, 544-553. (In German)
  • European Audiovisual Observatory. (2005). Haben oder nicht haben - must-carry-regeln [To have or not to have - must carry rules]. InIRIS Spezial.Straßburg: Europäische audiovisuelle Informationsstelle. (In German)
  • European Parliament 2007/0247. (COD).Electronic communications: common regulatory framework for networks and services, access, interconnection and authorisation(‘Telecoms Package’ (amend. Directives 2002/19/EC, 2002/20/EC and 2002/21/EC)). Retrieved March 26, 2011, fromhttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5563972
  • Fransmann, M. (2003). Evolution of the Telecommunications Industry. In G. Madden (Ed.),World Telecommunications Markets(pp. 15-38). London: Elgar.
  • Newsticker, H. (2009).Netzbetreiber wollen routen sichern[Network operators want to secure their routes]. Retrieved November 25, 2010, fromhttp://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Netzbetreiber-wollen-Routen-sichern-854376.html
  • Kleinz, T. (2009).Eco-Kongress: Bundesnetzagentur bekennt sich zu Netzneutralität[Eco-Congress: Federal network agencyadmits network neutrality]. Retrieved March 26, 2011, fromhttp://www.heise.de/ix/meldung/Eco-Kongress-Bundesnetzagentur-bekennt-sich-zu-Netzneutralitaet-798129.html
  • Krone, J. (2009). IPTV und Mobile TV als vierte und fünfte Säule in der Übertragung von Fernsehinhalten in Deutschland und Österreich [IPTV and Mobile TV as the fourth and fifth pillar in the transmission of TV content in Germany and Austria]. In J. Krone (Ed.),Fernsehen im Wandel. Mobile TV & IPTV in Deutschland und Österreich(11-21). Baden-Baden: Nomos. (In German)
  • Latzer, M.; Just, N.; Sauerwein, F.; Slominski, P. (2002).Selbst- und Koregulierung im Mediamatiksektor. Alternative Regulierungsformen zwischen Staat und Markt[Self- and co-regulation in the mediamatic sector. Alternative regulatory approaches between the state and the market]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. (In German)
  • Marcus, S.J.; Elixmann, D. (2008).The Future of IP Interconnection. Technical, Economic and Public Policy Aspects(Study for the European Commission). Bad Honnef: WIK.
  • Meyer-Lucht, R. (2009).Koalitionsvertrag und Internet: Weniger als erhofft, mehr als erwartet[Coalition treaty and the internet: Less than expected, more than anticipated]. Retrieved December 2, 2010, fromhttp://carta.info/16863/koalitionsvertrag-internet-schwarz-gelb-medienpolitik
  • N.N. (2009).Alcatel Lucent: Kurzzeitig mehr Bandbreite für ein paar Cent[Alcatel Lucent: Short-term broadband boost for a few cent]. Retrieved March 26, 2011, fromhttp://www.golem.de/0904/66552.html
  • N.N. (2009a). Dienste im Internet - Gopher[Services on the Internet - Gopher]. In Netplanet, Retrieved December 2, 2010, fromhttp://www.netplanet.org/dienste/gopher.shtml
  • Rott, A.; Grannemann, A. (2011). Die ermittlung des finanziellen aufwands von telemedien im öffentlich-rechtlichen rundfunk: Probleme und perspektiven [Calculating the financial demand of telemedia in public sector broadcasting: Problems and perspectives]. In H. Gundlach (Ed.),Public value in der digital- und internetökonomie(pp. 144 - 157). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. (In German)
  • Scott, M.; Elixmann, D. (2008).The Future of IP Interconnection. Technical, Economic and Public Policy Aspects.Brusells: European Commission.
  • Trick, U.; Weber, F. (2007).SIP, TCP/IP und Telekommunikationsnetze[SIP, TCP/IP and telecommunications networks]. München: Oldenbourg. (In German)
  • Zerdick, A.; Picot, A.; Schrape, K. (1999).Die Internet-Ökonomie. Strategien für die Digitale Wirtschaft[The internet economy. Strategies for a digital marketplace]. Berlin: Springer. (In German)
  • Zerdick, A.; Picot, A.; Schrape, K.; Burgelman, J.; Silverstone, R. (2004).E-Merging Media. Die Zukunft der Kommunikation[E-merging media. The future of communication]. Berlin: Springer. (In German)
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-article-doi-10-2478-v10088-011-0007-3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.