2010 | 127 | 25-37
Article title

Tropological space: the imaginary space of figuration

Title variants
Languages of publication
The paper is devoted to the concept oftropological space, introduced by Michel Foucault in 1966 and alluded to in Hayden White'stropics of discourse(1973, 1978, 2000), but never described in any detail in literary semantics or linguistic stylistics. The author presents her theory of a triple functional subdivision of stylistic figures and, consequently, of tropes (micro-, macro- and mega (meta)-level of description) and relates it to a gradually expanding tropological space of particular figures, their chains and groupings within a text. The author postulates that tropological space, the imaginary space created through figuration, is a sub-space of the Wittgensteinianlogical spaceas well as a sub-space oftextual / discursive space. Although the discussion refers mostly to literary texts,tropology- a branch of stylistics / poetics / rhetoric makes generalizations valid for the study of all kinds of texts / discourses. Figuration is assumed here to be an inherent feature of conceptual and linguistic expression. Finally, the author raises a methodological query as to the ontological status of tropological space, opting for the approach which treats it as a peculiar kind ofsemantic spacerather than a mere metaphoric term.The discussion is based mostly on the Anglo-American studies on figuration (K. Burke, H. White, P. de Man, J. Hillis Miller, G. Hartman) that are rooted in the neo-classical rhetoric and writings of G. Vico. This line of thinking draws its philosophical inspiration from the European hermeneutics of P. Ricœur, the Foucaultian theory of discourses and the Derridean deconstructionist ideas on the operation of language. The author brings additionally into consideration the conception ofartistic spacepropagated by the Russian semiotic tradition and V. N. Toporov (1983/2003) in particular.
Physical description
  • Barthes R. 1970/1999.S / Z.Warszawa.
  • Barthes R. 1971/1994. Une idée de recherche. - Marty E. (ed.)Œuvres complètes[vol. II]. Paris: 1218-1221.
  • Burke K. 1945/1962.A grammar of motives.Cleveland, New York.
  • Chrzanowska-Kluczewska E. 2003. Mikrotropy, makrotropy, metatropy. -StylistykaXII: 207-224.
  • Chrzanowska-Kluczewska E. 2004a. Microtropes, macrotropes, metatropes. -AAA - Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik29. 1: 65-80.
  • Chrzanowska-Kluczewska E. 2004b.Language-games: pro and against.Kraków.
  • Chrzanowska-Kluczewska E. 2007. Logical/textual space vs. physical space. - Freeman D. C., Baş I. (eds.)Challenging the boundaries[PALA II]. Amsterdam, New York.
  • Chrzanowska-Kluczewska E. 2009a. Philosophical underpinnings of metatropes: is Vico's tropological circle a vicious circle? - Chrzanowska-Kluczewska E., Szpila G. (eds.)In search of (non)sense.Newcastle u. Tyne: 102-114.
  • Chrzanowska-Kluczewska E. 2009b. Possible worlds - text worlds - discourse worlds in a dialogic context. - Chrzanowska-Kluczewska E., Gołda-Derejczyk A. (eds.)The contextuality of language and culture.Bielsko-Biała: 157-171.
  • Derrida J. 1977.Of grammatology.Baltimore.
  • Eco U. 1990.The limits of interpretation.Bloomington, Indianapolis.
  • Eco U. 2002/2006.On literature.London.
  • Enkvist N. E. 1989. Connexity, interpretability, universes of discourse, and text worlds. - Sturé A. (ed.)Possible worlds in humanities, arts and sciences. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65 (1986).Berlin: 162-186.
  • Fish S. 1980.Is there a text in this class?Cambridge, MA.
  • Fish S. 1989.Doing what comes naturally. Change, rhetoric and the practice of theory in literature and legal studies.Durham, NC.
  • Foucault M. 1966/2009.The order of things. An archaeology of the human sciences.London, New York.
  • Fowler R. 1986.Linguistic criticism.Oxford, New York.
  • Hartman G. 1985.Easy pieces.New York.
  • Hillis Miller J. 1986. On edge: the crossways of contemporary criticism. - Eaves M., Fischer M. (eds.)Romanticism and contemporary criticism.Ithaca, New York [Polish transl. 2000. Krawędź: współczesne badania literackie na rozstajach. - Nycz R. (ed.)Dekonstrukcja w badaniach literackich.Gdańsk: 143-182].
  • Ingarden R. 1931/1973.The literary work of art[transl. G. G. Grabowicz]. Evanston, ILL.
  • Jakobson R. 1956. Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. - Jakobson R., Halle M. (eds.)Fundamentals of language[=Janua Linguarum1]. 'S-Gravenhage: 53-82.
  • Kövecses Z. 2002.Metaphor. A practical introduction.Oxford.
  • Lakoff G., Johnson M. 1980.Metaphors we live by.Chicago.
  • Lakoff G., Turner M. 1989.More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor.Chicago, London.
  • Lambert K., van Fraassen B. 1970. Meaning relations, possible objects, and possible worlds. - Lambert K. (ed.)Philosophical problems in logic. Some recent developments.Dordrecht: 1-19.
  • Lausberg H. 1960.Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik.München [Polish transl. 2002.Retoryka literacka. Podstawy wiedzy o literaturze.Bydgoszcz].
  • Lewis D. 1979. Attitudesde dictoandde se.-Philosophical Review88.4: 513-543.
  • de Man P. 1971.Blindness and insight: essays in the rhetoric of contemporary criticism.Oxford.
  • de Man P. 1979a.Allegories of reading. Figural language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust.New Haven.
  • de Man P. 1979b. Autobiography as de-facement. -Modern Language Notes94: 919-930.
  • de Man P. 1986/2006.The resistance to theory.Minneapolis, London.
  • Ricœur P. 1975/2008.The rule of metaphor.London, New York.
  • Rorty R. 1991.Objectivity, relativism and truth: essays on Heidegger and others[vol. II]. Cambridge.
  • Runcini R. 1978. The social and individual imagination. - Sosień B. (ed.)Ľespace, la théâtralité et ľimaginaire.Kraków: 23-25.
  • Semino E. 2008.Metaphor in discourse.Cambridge.
  • Shukman A. 1977.Literature and semiotics. A study of the writings of Yu. M. Lotman.Amsterdam, New York, Oxford.
  • Stockwell P. 2002.Cognitive poetics. An introduction.London, New York.
  • Toporov V. N. 1983/2003. [Prostranstvo i tekst]Przestrzeń i rzecz.Kraków.
  • Vico G. 1725/2002.The first New Science[ed. and transl. by L. Pompa]. Cambridge.
  • Vico G. 1744/1984.The New Science of Giambattista Vico[unabridged translation of the 3rdedition 1744 by T. G. Bengin and M. H. Fisch]. Ithaca, London.
  • Werth P. 1994. Extended metaphor - a text-world account. -Language and Literature3.2: 79-103.
  • Werth P. 1999.Text worlds: representing conceptual space in discourse.Harlow.
  • White H. 1973.Metahistory. The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe.Baltimore, London.
  • White H. 1978/1985.Tropics of discourse. Essays in cultural criticism.Baltimore, London.
  • White H. 2000.Figural realism. Studies in the mimesis effect.Baltimore, London.
  • Wittgenstein L. 1922/2008.Tractatus logico-philosophicus.London, New York.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.