Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2008 | 12 | 3 | 183-202

Article title

Flexible Working in Scottish Local Authority Property: Developing a Combined Resource Management Strategy

Content

Title variants

LT
Lankstus Darbas Škotijos Vietos Valdžios Požiūriu: Kuriame Kombinuotą Išteklių Vadybos Strategiją

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
As indicated in Government reports and previous research, the traditional office environment of both central and local governments has been occupied with high occupancy cost. Flexible working supported by information and communication technology, human resource, and workspace management has emerged as a modern concept for managing office resources. Workspace management models covering both activity-based working area and portfolio flexibility are developed to assist an organisation to allocate staff and working area more flexibly and efficiently. However, public organisations like Scottish Local Authorities (SLAs) are unlikely to fully adopt commercial workspace management models. Therefore, the concept of a combined resource management strategy has been introduced to assist the Authorities in considering adoption in financial/economic terms before taking-up of flexible working in practice.
LT
Kaip rodo Vyriausybės ataskaitos ir ankstesnis tyrimas, ir centrinės, ir vietos valdžios tradiciniuose biuruose daug dėmesio skirta didelėms turto valdymo sąnaudoms. Lankstus grafikas, pagrįstas informacinių ir komunikacinių technologijų, žmogiškųjų išteklių ir darbo vietos vadyba, atsirado kaip modernus biuro išteklių valdymo būdas. Jau yra darbo vietos valdymo modelių, kurie apima ir su veikla susijusią darbo vietą, ir portfelio lankstumą, leidžia organizacijai lanksčiau ir efektyviau paskirstyti darbuotojus bei biurų plotą. Tačiau mažai tikėtina, kad valstybinės organizacijos, pavyzdžiui, Škotijos vietos valdžia, perims nepakeistus komercinius darbo vietos valdymo modelius. Todėl pristatyta kombinuotos išteklių vadybos strategijos idėja, kuri padėtų valdžiai apsvarstyti modelių taikymą finansine ir ekonomine prasme prieš realiai imantis lankstaus darbo.

Publisher

Year

Volume

12

Issue

3

Pages

183-202

Physical description

Contributors

  • School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Napier University, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh, Scotland EH10 5DT, UK
author
  • School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Napier University, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh, Scotland EH10 5DT, UK

References

  • Audit Commission (1988a) Local Authority Property: A Management Overview. London: HMSO.
  • Audit Commission (1988b) Local Authority Property: A Management Overview. London: HMSO.
  • Audit Commission (2000) Hot Property: Getting the best from local authority assets. London: the Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales.
  • Black, K. (1994)Business Statistics: Contemporary Decision Making.New York: West Publishing.
  • Bryman, A. (2004)Social Research Methods.2nded. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dawson, C. (2006)A Practical Guide to Research Methods: A user-friendly manual for mastering research techniques and projects.2nded. Oxford: How to Books.
  • Dettwiler, P. (2008) Modelling the relationship between business cycles and office location: The growth firms,Facilities, 26(3/4), pp. 157-172.
  • DfEE (2000) Work-life balance: Changing Patterns in a changing world. London: Department for Education and Employment.
  • Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J.L., Groves, R.M. and Little, R.J.A. (2002) Survey Nonresponses in design, data collection, and analysis. In: Groves, R.M., Dillman, D.A., Eltinge, J.L. and Little, R.J.A. (eds.)Survey Nonresponse.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dillman, D.A. (2000)Mail and Internet Surveys: The tailored design method.2nded. New York: Wiley.
  • Field, A. (2005)Discovering Statistics: Using SPSS.2nded. London: SAGE.
  • Fink, A. (2006)How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide.3rded. London: SAGE
  • Gershon, P., Sir (2004) Releasing resources to the front line: Independent Review of Public Sector Efficiency. London: HMSO.
  • Gibson, V. (2000) Property portfolio dynamics: thee flexible management of inflexible assets,Facilities, 18(3/4), pp. 150-154.
  • Gibson, V. (2003) Flexible working needs flexible space?: Towards an alternative workplace strategy,Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 21(1), pp. 12-22.
  • Gibson, V. and Hedley, C. (1999) Information and Performance Measurement: A Study of Current Practice in Corporate Property Management.The Cutting Edge 1999: Proceedings of the RICS Research Conference, Cambridge, 6th-7thSeptember 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  • Gibson, V. and Lizieri, C. (1999) New business practices and the corporate real estate portfolio: How responsive is the UK property market?Journal of Property Research, 16(3), pp. 201-218.
  • Gibson, V. and Lizieri, C. (2000) Change and flexibility: The role of serviced office space in office markets and corporate property portfolios,RICS Research Papers, 3(12), pp. 1-16.
  • Gibson, V. and Luck, R. (2004) Flexible working in Central Government: Leverage the benefit. London: Office of Government Commerce.
  • Harris, R. (1996) Less a Castle, More a Condominium: Taking a look at the office of the future. London: Gerald Eve Research.
  • Laing, A. Duffy, F., Jaunzens, D. and Wills, S. (1998)New Environments for Working: The Redesign of Offices and Environmental Systems for New Ways for Working.London: E&FN Spon.
  • Lyons, M., Sir (2004a) Well Placed to Deliver? Shaping the Pattern of Government Service. London: HMSO.
  • Lyons, M., Sir (2004b) Towards Better Management of Public Sector Assets: A Report to the Chancellor of the Exchequer. London: HMSO.
  • McGregor, W. (2000) The future of workspace management,Facilities, 18(3/4), pp. 138-143.
  • NAO (2006a) Getting the best from public sector office accommodation. London: National Audit Office Press Office.
  • NAO (2006b) Getting the best from public sector office accommodation: case study. London: National Audit Office Press Office.
  • Nenonen, S. (2004) Analysis the intangible benefits of work space,Facilities, 22(9/10), pp. 233-239.
  • OGC (2006) Better Measurement Better Performance. London: OGC.
  • OGC and IPD (2005a) Property Benchmarking Project OGC/51 - Final Report for Pilot Phase. London: OGC and IPD.
  • OGC and IPD (2005b) Property Benchmarking Project OGC/51 - Final Report for Pilot Phase: Appendices. London: OGC and IPD.
  • Simms, C. and Rogers, B. (2006) The significance of flexibility in improving return on property investment: The UK perspective,Facilities, 24(3/4), pp. 106-119.
  • Szarejko, W. and Trocka-Leszczynska, E. (2007) Aspect of functionality in modernization of office buildings,Facilities, 25(3/4), pp. 163-170.
  • Ward, V. and Holtman, C. (2000) The role of private and public spaces in knowledge management.Proceedings of the BPRC Conference on Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies, 10-11 February 2000. Coventry: Warwick University.

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-article-doi-10-3846-1648-715X-2008-12-183-202
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.